@
Tajo-
So when someone shows you that you are being inconsistent, you just ignore it?
That is plausible given the way you reacted in your argument with Semioldguy previously.
I have already stated that I think Looker is scummy; that's where my vote will sit until/unless someone else more actively scummy appears.
I've shared and continue to share my thoughts on all the active players, and I've asked for prods/replacements on the inactive/uninterested.
I will add that Empking's recent posts look like an opportunistic wagon against Zwet and complete BS on Mora.
-As for what to do with anti-town players such as Zwet or Looker, I think we should treat them like any other player. If they do anything that is actually scummy (which Looker has done), we should push for a lynch. He should claim prior to being lynched (but it is ridiculous to call for him to claim with 1-2 votes on him).
Just because a player is anti-town and/or crazy, does not mean it is impossible to find scumtells in their behavior.
If any of their anti-town behavior is seriously affecting the ability of the town to catch scum OR if we had absolutely nothing to go on and no leads at all, then I could agree with a policy lynch. However, that is not our current situation.
@Sirdanilot-
Not quite true, although I can kinda guess at what you were thinking of.
Mora and
Kast both told you to keep us updated as you go along.
Mora and
Ace, chided you for posting opinions on the current lynch of Zwet based only on the initial 1/4 of the game. They weren't telling you to stop posting your thoughts, they were telling you not to judge the current Zwet wagon based only on the initial portion of the game.
Kast asked you to post your thoughts for the remaining 3/4 of the game. This was not a request to stop posting until you finished reading.
@ZEEnon-
You told us you are here and were upset that someone tried attacking you while you are V/LA. Then post some content if you are really here and not just lurking until your name comes up.
@RBT-
How does Tajo backing off a sure lynch indicate that he is mafia?
Agreed that claiming his plan is responsible for lynching scum D1 is an inaccurate way to present D1. But his plan did have a part in leading to SK's lynch. The majority of credit for that lynch should go to Ace.
@Semioldguy-
I think Looker's initial dodging against claiming whether he had items makes sense with your speculation that SK may have known the items but intentionally chose to claim no item knowledge to split up from other scumbuddies. Looker could very feasibly have been waiting for his scum buddies to act first and then make his decision after.
@
Tajo-
Tajo wrote:Still big prob of having third parties in the group of people not having item descriptions.
This is the second time that you presented this speculation as fact. The first time I ignored it as ambiguous language. But now you present it again.
