MKM II GAME OVER

AceMarksman · Post Post #1400 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 3:40 am

also, some of us now have zero votes? There must be vote-reducing roles.

Gorrad · Post Post #1401 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:02 am

sirdanilot wrote:
gorrad wrote: 2) I would be upset to see him lynched because, while I do think him scum, he actually posts, contributes significantly, analyses, etc. If he's town, his lynch would be a significantly bigger loss than that of Zwet.
1. Please post who you are talking to, or quote the post you are referring or link to it. A simple '@ person' takes only several milliseconds to type and is full of goody conveniency.
Anyway, even though I don't know what you're talking about here, activity shouldn't be a good reason not to lynch someone if you think he's scummy. That is just anti town.

That was at Ortolan. And if I personally have a strong preference to lynching scummy non-contributors it scummy contributors, I fail to see why you should care.

populartajo · Post Post #1402 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:12 am

sirdan wrote:
tajo wrote:ENOUGH.

You are softclaiming that you have information that indicates Im scum?

YES OR NO.
Could you please stop rolefishing? Thank you. It's bad if you're town, and it makes you looks scummy if you're scum.

No.

Some people say this is a town-town battle.

Ortolan is aparently softclaiming that he has additional information that indicates Im scum.

This means he is lying because Im town.

Do I have to remind you that he fakeclaimed cop recently?

Empking · Post Post #1403 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:27 am

populartajo wrote:
Do I have to remind you that he fakeclaimed cop recently?

What game?

populartajo · Post Post #1404 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:29 am

This game.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#1670404
God, Empking you were there.

populartajo · Post Post #1405 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:30 am

This game.

viewtopic.php?=1670404#1670404

God, Empking you were there.

Empking · Post Post #1406 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:31 am

populartajo wrote:This game.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#1670404
God, Empking you were there.

How did you make it invisible? How did you make invisible?

Are you really suggesting that he can't be be trusted because he lied as scum? Have you neve false claimed before?

Empking · Post Post #1407 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:32 am

What's going on?

populartajo · Post Post #1408 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:32 am

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 04#1670404

Empking · Post Post #1409 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:32 am

Empking wrote:
populartajo wrote:This game.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#1670404
God, Empking you were there.
How did you make it invisible? How did you make invisible?

Are you really suggesting that he can't be be trusted because he lied as scum? Have you neve false claimed before?

AceMarksman · Post Post #1410 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:33 am

That link is broken

populartajo · Post Post #1411 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:33 am

yep something is wrong

that is the right link, btw.

Empking · Post Post #1412 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:33 am

AceMarksman wrote:That link is broken

Works for me.

AceMarksman · Post Post #1413 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:35 am

The first link was broken, the second one works fine. I got ninja'd

Anywho, more ThAdmiral votes plz kthx.

populartajo · Post Post #1414 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:36 am

Gorrad wrote:
ThAdmiral wrote:due to the request my win con is that I win when there is only mushroom kingdom left.
If you have any other pertinent questions ask and I will answer to the best of my abilities.

Now i've got quite a bit of reading to do!
Protown!

Gorrad, what does this mean?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #1415 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:36 am

I endorse the above statement.

Gorrad · Post Post #1416 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:41 am

populartajo wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
ThAdmiral wrote:due to the request my win con is that I win when there is only mushroom kingdom left.
If you have any other pertinent questions ask and I will answer to the best of my abilities.

Now i've got quite a bit of reading to do!
Protown!

Gorrad, what does this mean?

I assumed he, like me, thought he was scum at first. My reasoning was that scum would claim BC off the bat, sure that BC was town, but confused BC would fakeclaim MK. Then he paraphrased his 'actual' win condition, one that is NOT, in fact, the town win condition, and I voted him. At this point I'd peg him as Warioware or DK.

Moratorium · Post Post #1417 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 5:35 am

unvote

vote: ThAdmiral

populartajo · Post Post #1418 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:14 am

populartajo wrote:
sirdan wrote:
tajo wrote:ENOUGH.

You are softclaiming that you have information that indicates Im scum?

YES OR NO.
Could you please stop rolefishing? Thank you. It's bad if you're town, and it makes you looks scummy if you're scum.
No.

Some people say this is a town-town battle.

Ortolan is aparently softclaiming that he has additional information that indicates Im scum.

This means he is lying because Im town.

Do I have to remind you that he fakeclaimed cop recently?

Mora and EVERYONE, thoughts of this.

sirdanilot · Post Post #1419 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:53 am

Gorrad wrote:
sirdanilot wrote:
gorrad wrote: 2) I would be upset to see him lynched because, while I do think him scum, he actually posts, contributes significantly, analyses, etc. If he's town, his lynch would be a significantly bigger loss than that of Zwet.
1. Please post who you are talking to, or quote the post you are referring or link to it. A simple '@ person' takes only several milliseconds to type and is full of goody conveniency.
Anyway, even though I don't know what you're talking about here, activity shouldn't be a good reason not to lynch someone if you think he's scummy. That is just anti town.
That was at Ortolan. And if I personally have a strong preference to lynching scummy non-contributors it scummy contributors, I fail to see why you should care.

Could you stop being anti-town?

Of course

I should care. I am a town aligned player and if you have anti town ideas it's my job (and that of the rest of the town) to discuss them. Lynching an inactive player over an active scummy one is a very bad tactic since the goal of the game is to lynch scum.

Can some of the very tiny amount of non-scumbags in this game please comment here.

populartajo wrote:
sirdan wrote:
Could you please stop rolefishing? Thank you. It's bad if you're town, and it makes you looks scummy if you're scum.
No.

Some people say this is a town-town battle.

Ortolan is aparently softclaiming that he has additional information that indicates Im scum.

This means he is lying because Im town.

Do I have to remind you that he fakeclaimed cop recently?

I would vote you right now if it weren't for the fact that ThAdmiral is scum. Seriously, my fingers already jumped to the [,b,],v,o,t,e,:,p,o,p,t,a,j,o,[,/,b and ] keys automatically. I'll try to count to 10, calm down and actually address this.

For the EXACT SAME TIME, you now say 'ortolan is apparently softclaiming blablabla'. He

isn't

. Stop pushing him for a claim. Why would he softclaim you are scum if he did actually hard softclaim that zwet is town? And where do you see him softclaiming.

Ugh it's almost impossible to fight your bad logic.

I don't give a SHIT that he fakeclaimed cop recently. Seriously.

Sorry, I'm frustrated.

populartajo · Post Post #1420 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:02 am

ort wrote:I have nothing personal against you tajo
I simply need you to die
in order to fulfill my (town) win condition

ort wrote:I think you should vote tajo,
he is scum
.

ort wrote:I have many reasons for concluding tajo is scum

I think you should read more closely

ort wrote:Yer I guess it is,
tajo is an obvious lynch
to me
whereas zwet is an obvious mislynch
.

Please discuss.

Also for lullz

ort wrote:I'm very interested to see if you keep going as hard after someone who can defend himself (ThAdmiral) now, tajo.

sirdanilot · Post Post #1421 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:27 am

oh snap, almost did it again! My fingers already jumped to vote you there, tajo!

Your post 1420 there accomplished ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It's COMPLETE FLUFF. So it shows places where ort pushes for your lynch without content? Where he is referencing to previously posted content? So what!? Unless you can prove to us that he in fact hasn't posted the content he is reffering to ANYWHERE AT ALL, the point is completely moot!

A little analogy here: Ort says he has found a black swan, but he keeps showing white swans to everyone. Tajo says 'LOL YOU HAVEN'T FOUND A BLACK SWAN AT ALL U NOOB' and he tries to prove this by showing all the white swans Ort has found.
Obviously this is not logical. He would have to show EVERY SINGLE swan of Ortolan and prove they are all white, in order to prove his case.

So Tajo, unless you can show me ALL of ort's post and show how the content he's referring to is not there, you are posting fluff posts without content and I think I already know where my vote is going at the first possible moment that we have no confirmed scum that is not called poptajo.

Now you HAVE to answer my post 1419. I cannot stand for the consequences if you don't. Seriously.

sirdanilot · Post Post #1422 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:29 am

ebwop:

sirdanilot wrote:and he tries to prove this by showing all the white swans

In order to get my point across better, read: 'and he tries to prove this by showing

several

white swans'

populartajo · Post Post #1423 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:37 am

@ sirdan:

facepalm.

You asked for posts where ortolan is apparently softclaiming. I gave them to you. Now Ill let everyone analyse those.

I suck at analogies, metaphores and such. Can you tell me the exact reason why you are going to vote me?

caf19 · Post Post #1424 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:41 am

I don't really think that ort has role-related info, or is softclaiming to that effect. I just think that he has a tendency to become incredibly sure of himself (it's the same sort of thing as when he said zwet is town). This doesn't really impact on ort's likely role or alignment at all.