Good Omens Mafia! Game Over.

[SinisterOverlord]

Done, and done.

Vote: mith

[mith]

Bah?

The internet access here is crappy, so give me til Friday to put up a proper defense, but I would not be surprised if I came up guilty to certain investigations. I am also pretty sure I can prove my role, at least so far as what I can claim.

A few votes don't worry me, but you're going to get a heck of a rant if you accidentally lynch me before I have a chance to respond.

[SubtleTactix]

I guess I can wait until Friday to hear what mith has to say. No vote for now.
--Tactix

[olio]

You give him 2 days to think of his defense?! Why in the world he would need two days to claim if he is innocent?

FOS: SubtleTactix
vote: mith

Btw, I like your new avatar Pooky

[Fuldu]

The only role I can think of that I would have credited "guilty to some investigations" was Crowley, who mith is clearly not. I'm perfectly comfortable giving him time to say whatever he wants to say, but I don't think I'm likely to believe it.

[Locus Cosecant]

It doesn't really

hurt

us to wait. If nothing else, it might be amusing to try to watch him wriggle out of it.

FOS: olio

FOV: mith

[Polotet]

Just to update you since things are moving so fast, I count 7 votes for mith so far, with 14 votes needed to lynch.

[DarkLight140]

Well... I guess Sister Mary Loquacious might be guilty-ish, but... she sounds more mafia-spy than anything else. What with serving the forces of Hell, and all. And that's the only maybe-guilty-maybe-not and still living role I can think of.

Eh, I can wait. I'm expecting much, though...

[Seol]

I'm going to wait to hear what mith has to say, but I'll take some convincing. Provisional unbolded doesn't-quite-count

vote mith

.

[Locus Cosecant]

Oh, and I forgot to mention (should have said this first off). Where is Genocide Heart? I remember him as scummy from yestiddy.

[Electra]

vote: mith

[Electra]

Ahh sorry. Page 18 didn't load for me until I posted. >__> I won't bother removing the vote since we're still pretty far from a lynch anyway.

[Fuldu]

Well... I guess Sister Mary Loquacious might be guilty-ish, but... she sounds more mafia-spy than anything else. What with serving the forces of Hell, and all. And that's the only maybe-guilty-maybe-not and still living role I can think of.

Eh, I can wait. I'm expecting much, though...

For future reference, DarkLight, suggesting roles that might be interpreted as guilty-appearing after someone has said that they will be needing to do so but before they actually do is generally a bad idea. Unless, as was the case with mine, the role in question is dead. Now, since mith can't actually claim a role name (per the rules), it's not as serious here, but still. Typically it's a no-no.

[Desperate Heart]

I'm here, Locus.

I'll wait until Friday, though.

[Iammars]

I am replacing, and I say

Vote: mith

.
Notes about me: Even though I read over the previous 187 pages, I am still kinda *woosh* about the past discussion. I'm not able to keep up with big games in the middle like this. The only reason i can keep up with the big games at misetings is becasue I read them while they're going on.
Also, I will be gone from tomorrow-Monday to a chess tournament at Nashville. I am leaving for the flight at @$#&6:25AM#&*$)!!!!

[Coron]

holy crap! 187 pages! ... oh wait you mean 18 that's a lot better.

[Iammars]

I meant 17, but I originally wrote 18 and I forgot to backspace.

[olio]

Ah.. I had already forgotten the "no name-claims allowed" -thingie. Now, if I get the rules of this game right, mith can only tell the basic description of his role and maybe the reason why he - according to him - shows as baddie for some investigators. Why didn't he give us the former in his latest post?

[Locus Cosecant]

Iammars - if you can't keep up with them, why do you replace into them?

[PeaceBringer]

vote Mith

just more pressure while awaiting whatever defense he has.

[Iammars]

I read Good Omes needs replacement and I didn't check the thread. I assumed it was a mini. I realize that this was stupid now because the signup had its own special thread. Eventually I'll figure out how this site works. Plus, I feel bad for mods who need replacements, so the guilt drew me over.

[mith]

This is amusing. The first day lasted two months and resulted in no lynch, and now some of you can't wait a day or two? Rushing into things is horrible play, and quite suspicious.

Vote: olio

I'm not sure what part of my previous post wasn't clear, but to elaborate, I was at a solar physics conference at Cambridge, the computers they had available for internet access were pathetic, and when I posted I only had a couple minutes before the next session. I wanted to read the rules to make sure of how much I could say, and I hate rushing posts.

Now, on to address things:

My role is essentially a vigilante type. If I'm reading the rules correctly, I'm not allowed to say exactly what the details of me using my ability are (i.e., how often I can use it, and so on). However, I will say that I haven't used it yet, and I *can* show that to you, simply by making a kill tonight (or whenever the town decides it would be useful) and you noting that it is a different type of kill. It's also possible you will be able to get an idea of what my role might be and why I might appear as scum to certain investigators; I can't say that for certain, but it seems likely.

I find it rather incredible that so many people have voted already, considering the type of game we're in. Do you honestly think that things will be so clear as that in this large a game with this many groups? We're going to have some guilties that can't be found by every investigator, and we're going to have some innocents appear guilty to some. I don't have the book at hand (net cafe), but I can really only think of one character that would be likely to get perfectly "nice" results, and given Pooky's had to confirm his "sanity" at all, it should be clear that he doesn't have it (I doubt anyone does, but who knows).

Stop acting like a bunch of mindless sheep and think, please.

The only role I can think of that I would have credited "guilty to some investigations" was Crowley

Well... I guess Sister Mary Loquacious might be guilty-ish

As pointed out, I can not name a role, so I am not going to list possibilities here including mine. However, I can think of several roles that could appear guilty sometimes. Grab the book and think about it some more. You'll feel pretty stupid if you lynch me and find out what my role is.

I think that's all. I don't see how it could possibly hurt the town to give me a day to show myself, but whatever... just think before you vote.

[Seol]

Offtopic, but:

I was at a solar physics conference at Cambridge

There's one in Cambridge at the moment? There's one in Birmingham this week too!

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

The problem with that Mith is that it's quite possible that the Horsemen are a group and have a different kill mechanism for whichever Horseman they choose to do the killing or it could be that you're part of Satan's group and have a choice of kill mechanism and you choose the one that seems more righteous or what not.

Killing in a different method doesn't really prove anything and right now you're the best we have to go on.

[mith]

The problem with that Mith is that it's quite possible that the Horsemen are a group and have a different kill mechanism for whichever Horseman they choose to do the killing or it could be that you're part of Satan's group and have a choice of kill mechanism and you choose the one that seems more righteous or what not.

For the first, that is certainly possible, but I am quite sure you would be able to tell the difference between my killing method and that. For the second... that's a bit of a reach, and not particularly in theme. The hell folk in the book are not exactly subtle about their evilness.

Obviously I can't prove 100% that I am innocent. That's just the way things go in Theme games. It's simply bad play though to lynch straight away when there's a good chance at getting more information.

And of course I disagree that I am the best you have to go on. olio's posts are just insane, for instance. I question the motives of anyone that advocates pushing through a lynch before plenty of information is milked out of things.

Seol: http://www.mist.ac.uk/mistsr05.html (not much up yet, but anyway)