Mini 778 - Inventor Mafia (OVER)

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:37 pm

Wow, more confusion and still not presenting a case.
You do realize by not making a case you are proving my case, don't you?

Vote Count:

AceMarksman (0) -
Beyond_Birthday (1) - Lobstermania
Darox (1) - Empking
Duckduck96 (0) -
Empking (2) - , AceMarksman, Duckduck96
Lobstermania (3) - Beyond_Birthday, Melikefood, Darox
Melikefood (2) - Empking, Semioldguy
Semioldguy (0) -
Zazier (0) -

Duckduck96 is V/LA until 7/4
Melikefood is V/LA 7/1 - 7/3

semioldguy · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:23 am

Empking wrote:Semi: Why are you so sure there isn't a GF?

I'm not sure that there isn't one. If there is though, there are other ways of catching him aside from investigations.

Riceballtail · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:24 pm

Deadline set: 7/15/09

This will be removed pending more player activity.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:50 pm

This looks like something I'd do, Rice. Taking a move out of my deck, huh? Cool with me.

I'm just going to keep waiting for Lobster to play the game.

Empking · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:27 pm

lobstermania wrote:
Empking wrote:Darox: Pie or Cake?
melikefood wrote:Empking:WTF you doin?
Empking wrote:Asking questions.
That doesn't help to clear up
any
confusion! How is this supposed to make sense to anyone?

How doesn't it make sense.

lobstermania · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:25 am

How does "Pie or Cake" relate to anything in the game we are currently playing? That is what confuses me.
And BB, I'm sorry, but you are trying to strawman me by ignoring Empking's blatantly random and unrelated posts and using my posts asking for his clarification to attack me.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:09 pm

Strawman-representing a case that another player has made in order to make it appear weaker than it really is.

You are claiming that I am ignoring Empking's play, causing strawman. This is a blatant lie since I cannot strawman you without representing your case, particularly when you lack a case and have merely stated that Empking is being distracting. Please, this time, do a little research and realize that Empking is 1% useless and 99% hot gas.

Darox · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:02 am

Beyond Birthday is just spouting gibberish now.

Unvote

I don't feel happy with a vote on lobster at this point.

Vote:Empking

You're not even trying any more.

AceMarksman · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:27 am

Responding to prod, substantial post soon.

Empking · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:40 am

Darox wrote:Beyond Birthday is just spouting gibberish now.

Unvote

I don't feel happy with a vote on lobster at this point.

Vote:Empking

You're not even trying any more.

Says the person who refused to post even when asked direct questions.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:25 am

Darox wrote:Beyond Birthday is just spouting gibberish now.

Unvote

I don't feel happy with a vote on lobster at this point.

Vote:Empking

You're not even trying any more.

Odds your scum went up 10%. You are a far better player than your play here indicates.

melikefood · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:56 pm

I'm back from Camp guys.

BB-How did Darox's scumminess go up?

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Sun Jul 05, 2009 5:48 pm

He's not playing well. Heck, I can't even find attempts at contributing.

Empking · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:54 pm

Unvote

Vote: Darox

duckduck96 · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:04 pm

I'm back. Right now I recommend we lynch Empking. Although I find some of BB's attacks to have merit, I feel that he has not in any way helped this town. Anyone not pro town is either scum or an awful townie.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:25 pm

My attacks have merit but don't help the town? That is casting soft doubt. Disassociation while using passive play to hurt another player is very scummy.

Fos Duck

for preferential selection.

melikefood · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:55 pm

I think when he said "he" he was referring to Empking.
That's how I read it anyway.

Duck, please Clarify.

duckduck96 · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:56 am

I feel that emp has not helped the town. Not BB. I ordered that in an unusual way.

Empking · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:44 am

duckduck96 wrote:I feel that emp has not helped the town. Not BB. I ordered that in an unusual way.

Asd the only player that's false for I consider that a bad argument.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:30 pm

duckduck96 wrote:I feel that emp has not helped the town. Not BB. I ordered that in an unusual way.

You did. I'll accept this as an apology.

lobstermania · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:48 pm

I'm starting to think that Emp has gone crazy. It seems logical that the scum could have a godfather who sends in the kills, and Empscum made a taser from one of his boxes, allowing the scum two kills. Because he killed as a vig, it wasn't noted as scum when melikefood used his spybot on Emp during Night One.
Question: Do you believe melikefood's night action claim? I do. I think the scum targeted Tar, and Emp targeted Zwetschen.

Vote: Empking

duckduck96 · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:09 am

I am pretty certain that food's claim is accurate, as, throughout the previous day, I have noted multiple instances where Emp was attacking Zwet, including a vote. After Mastin was killed, it seems like, as scum, he would feel that killing Zwet would make a possible good vig claim later. So, the question is: Would he have decided to kill Zwet as scum for the reasons above, or as a vig who actually believed he was scum. I'm inclined to believe the former. To me, it seems like this is what we should ponder... the question "Did Empking kill Zwet?" is pointless in my opinion. I find that it's rather obvious that he did. The question to ponder is the one I posed previously.

Empking · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:33 am

lobstermania wrote:I'm starting to think that Emp has gone crazy. It seems logical that the scum could have a godfather who sends in the kills, and Empscum made a taser from one of his boxes, allowing the scum two kills. Because he killed as a vig, it wasn't noted as scum when melikefood used his spybot on Emp during Night One.
Question: Do you believe melikefood's night action claim? I do. I think the scum targeted Tar, and Emp targeted Zwetschen.

Vote: Empking

You think that scum get two kills a night? Wow.

Can anyone give a scum motivation for killing Zwet?

lobstermania · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:26 am

Empking wrote:You think that scum get two kills a night? Wow.

No. I am saying the scum picked Tar as their night kill.
However, in this game we were given several boxes and a set of instructions to use on our own. My theory is that, aside from the mafia's kill,

on your own

, you used on of your boxes and created a Taser. Then,

as an individual player

you used your taser to kill Zwetshen.

So, to clarify: The scum killed Tar using their night kill and you killed Zwet using your night action via your box.
Still confused?

Empking · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:31 am

lobstermania wrote:
Empking wrote:You think that scum get two kills a night? Wow.
No. I am saying the scum picked Tar as their night kill.
However, in this game we were given several boxes and a set of instructions to use on our own. My theory is that, aside from the mafia's kill,
on your own
, you used on of your boxes and created a Taser. Then,
as an individual player
you used your taser to kill Zwetshen.

So, to clarify: The scum killed Tar using their night kill and you killed Zwet using your night action via your box.
Still confused?

So I've got the exact same odds as being scum as any other player has?

Or atre you sayng only scum has the possibility of a Taser?