Newbie 810 - Game over!

[xRECKONERx]

You had... no reasoning of your own to vote for her? You only voted for KittyMo because other people did? She only had two votes on her, one of them was mine from the random voting stage.

Also, I find it odd that both KittyMo and TFGM had two votes on them, and yet Raven chose to vote Kitty. Explanation?

[Krauthammer]

I think TFGM had voted himself by that point.

[xRECKONERx]

But he was probably just going by the vote count on the top of the page. If he wasn't, then yeah, 3-1 isn't even close, that means the only other vote on KittyMo was my own random vote.

[BlueRaven]

i was going from the top, and just for randomness too...

[xRECKONERx]

So why did you choose Kitty over TFGM?

[BlueRaven]

2bh i dont know...

[xRECKONERx]

>_________________>

Well, this seems to be going nowhere. I'll just place an

FoS: Raven

until I have a chance to go back and see if there's anyone else that has slipped up enough to warrant further investigation.

[xRECKONERx]

Oh, right.

Unvote

for now. Though I highly expect that vote to end up back on there, I just don't want anyone to get trigger-happy and end D1 so quickly.

[BlueRaven]

XD yep as usual im a big help. oh and whats an FoS?

[xRECKONERx]

FoS is finger of suspicion, it is used to show suspicion on someone when you don't feel like a vote is warranted/can't place a vote.

[BlueRaven]

oh right. thanks

[Krauthammer]

I'm keeping the vote on now, as there still isn't anyone as skummy out there to my eyes, but the lack of answer is making me think he thought it was still joke phase? If you do anything that's townie at all (contribution, anything) I'll unvote you.

[12Keyblade]

OK BlueRaven, here's the thing:

The past few posts of yours are along the lines of "oh wel, i'm skrewd, nothn i kan do nao." This is highly scummy. I personally expect an explaination, with or without role claim, ASA NOW.

Without that...well, I don't know.

[reverendpsycho]

Not trying to stifle discussion at all.. I just don't think it's always a player's place to respond to every last detail in the game unless specifically asked to do so. Also, I'd like Psycho to respond to exactly how geek was taking the quotes out of context.

In my previous post I felt that geek took keyblade's simple question to FGM to explain his reasoning as suspicion. He also used ronnieroo's noting of a contradiction in FGM's logic as support for his vote on FGM. Upon 2nd reading, that DOES seem to make sense. Still, IMO, I don't think simply asking someone to explain their No Lynch vote is necessarily an act of suspicion. Then, in an effort to further support his reasoning, he states that 12keyblade did place an FoS on FGM. While that is true, geek's vote on FGM came

before

keyblade's FoS post.

So, I revise my statement and say that I believe geek took ONE post out of context.

As for my "tossing the finger" comment, scum tend to deflect attention away from themselves and find a target for everyone else to look at. My first RVS vote was indeed random, but the way keyblade rationalized his OMGUS vote by stating that he wasn't the last one to confirm smelled funny. Couple that with a few ppl voting for FGM, admittedly by FGM's own doing, it seems a bit odd, don't you think?

[reverendpsycho]

also,

FoS: Blue Raven.

What the hell is up with your last few posts? Explain please.

[geekalicious]

In my previous post I felt that geek took keyblade's simple question to FGM to explain his reasoning as suspicion. He also used ronnieroo's noting of a contradiction in FGM's logic as support for his vote on FGM. Upon 2nd reading, that DOES seem to make sense. Still, IMO, I don't think simply asking someone to explain their No Lynch vote is necessarily an act of suspicion. Then, in an effort to further support his reasoning, he states that 12keyblade did place an FoS on FGM. While that is true, geek's vote on FGM came before keyblade's FoS post.

I'm finally starting to see how I possibly mis-quoted. Yes, 12Keyblade pointed his FoS at TheFlyingGreenMonkey after I made the post. However, I make the assumption that if something about a post is causing you to query about it, then suspicion must be aroused on some basic level at least. So maybe we're having a disagreement on what counts as someone being suspicious.

And BlueRaven, I'm also going to ask for some real justification for your vote. Your post sequence on this page did not shed any light at all.

[xRECKONERx]

The problem is, I don't think further asking BlueRaven to explain any posts is going to be fruitless. He seems like a newbie who got flustered by a quick bandwagon post. I'll admit it's very odd, but I also think this could be a quick way for scum to get a newbtown dead on D1.

[12Keyblade]

Not trying to stifle discussion at all.. I just don't think it's always a player's place to respond to every last detail in the game unless specifically asked to do so. Also, I'd like Psycho to respond to exactly how geek was taking the quotes out of context.

In my previous post I felt that geek took keyblade's simple question to FGM to explain his reasoning as suspicion. He also used ronnieroo's noting of a contradiction in FGM's logic as support for his vote on FGM. Upon 2nd reading, that DOES seem to make sense. Still, IMO, I don't think simply asking someone to explain their No Lynch vote is necessarily an act of suspicion. Then, in an effort to further support his reasoning, he states that 12keyblade did place an FoS on FGM. While that is true, geek's vote on FGM came

before

keyblade's FoS post.

So, I revise my statement and say that I believe geek took ONE post out of context.

As for my "tossing the finger" comment, scum tend to deflect attention away from themselves and find a target for everyone else to look at. My first RVS vote was indeed random, but the way keyblade rationalized his OMGUS vote by stating that he wasn't the last one to confirm smelled funny. Couple that with a few ppl voting for FGM, admittedly by FGM's own doing, it seems a bit odd, don't you think?

My random vote was simply that, random. My "reasoning" was that I didn't want a psycho around. I said before that that I wasn't last to confirm, solely to correct the facts of the matter.

[Vel-Rahn Koon]

TFGM has asked to be replaced.

[12Keyblade]

TFGM has asked to be replaced.

Fan-effing-tastic.

[xRECKONERx]

We're on page four!

Bah! IC golden rule #263: if you join a game, don't get flustered and replace out. Only replace out if you have legitimate real life issues that will interfere with the game.

[12Keyblade]

We're on page four!

Bah! IC golden rule #263: if you join a game, don't get flustered and replace out. Only replace out if you have legitimate real life issues that will interfere with the game.

*writes down rule*

[Vel-Rahn Koon]

TFGM's self-vote does not count since it didn't follow the rules set. The Unvote does count.

Official Vote Count

12Keyblade - 1 (reverendpsycho)
reverendpsycho - 1 (12Keyblade)
TheFlyingGreenMonkey - 1 (KittyMo)

BlueRaven - 2 (Krauthammer, geekalicious)

Not Voting - 4 (BlueRaven, ronnieroo, TheFlyingGreenMonkey, xRECKONERx)

5 to Lynch.

Deadline

is the end of Wednesday, July 22 (Eastern, GMT - 4).

[BlueRaven]

just to ask, what were to happen if we get to 22/07 and we still havnt reached a verdict?

[12Keyblade]

just to ask, what were to happen if we get to 22/07 and we still havnt reached a verdict?

Depends on the mod. Either a) No Lynch, or 2) whoever has the highest votes gets lynched.

Start 'splainin pls.