Darox wasn't osting. I wanted Darox to post. I ask Darox simple question. Darox still doesn't post. Darox is scum.lobstermania wrote:Empking: I am saying that your your crazy behavior is not beneficial (BB please call me a hypocrate and get over it) and you have done nothing productive since you were "cleared" as a vig by melikefood a few pages ago (read: cake or pie).
What I want to hear from you:
1. That you understand the point I am making
2. That you killed Zwetschen
3. Why I should change my vote based off your posts in this thread.
How does Darox's opinion on cake vs pie count as scumhunting?Empking wrote:Darox wasn't [p]osting. I wanted Darox to post. I ask Darox simple question. Darox still doesn't post. Darox is scum.
lobstermania wrote:What I want to hear from you:
1. That you understand the point I am making
2. That you killed Zwetschen
3. Why I should change my vote based off your posts in this thread.
What further questions do you have regarding my theory that you are both scum AND built a taser with your box and did a vig-kill?Empking wrote:Nein
Ja
As I've been scumhunting when nobody else was posting.
Neither are you.Darox wrote:Oh my, I didn't respond to an inane question, I must be scum!
Like I said before, you're not even trying.
So why are you voting Empking if you think scum targeted Tarhalindur?lobstermania wrote:I'm starting to think that Emp has gone crazy. It seems logical that the scum could have a godfather who sends in the kills, and Empscum made a taser from one of his boxes, allowing the scum two kills. Because he killed as a vig, it wasn't noted as scum when melikefood used his spybot on Emp during Night One.
Question: Do you believe melikefood's night action claim? I do. I think the scum targeted Tar, and Emp targeted Zwetschen.
Vote: Empking
There is no vigilante counter claim. There is no foreseeable downside to the vigilante counterclaiming if he is town. How do you find it more likely that scum will admit to their night kill and a 1-shot vigilante refuses to?duckduck96 wrote:I am pretty certain that food's claim is accurate, as, throughout the previous day, I have noted multiple instances where Emp was attacking Zwet, including a vote. After Mastin was killed, it seems like, as scum, he would feel that killing Zwet would make a possible good vig claim later. So, the question is: Would he have decided to kill Zwet as scum for the reasons above, or as a vig who actually believed he was scum. I'm inclined to believe the former. To me, it seems like this is what we should ponder... the question "Did Empking kill Zwet?" is pointless in my opinion. I find that it's rather obvious that he did. The question to ponder is the one I posed previously.
Its not his opinion its his choice to lurk.lobstermania wrote:How does Darox's opinion on cake vs pie count as scumhunting?Empking wrote:Darox wasn't [p]osting. I wanted Darox to post. I ask Darox simple question. Darox still doesn't post. Darox is scum.
It doesn't have anything to do with alignment. (Unless you're saying Zwet was obv-town.)lobstermania wrote:What I want to hear from you:
1. That you understand the point I am making
2. That you killed Zwetschen
3. Why I should change my vote based off your posts in this thread.What further questions do you have regarding my theory that you are both scum AND built a taser with your box and did a vig-kill?Empking wrote:Nein
Ja
As I've been scumhunting when nobody else was posting.
Asking a question that isn't game related doesn't seem like the best idea. Why didn't you ask something relevant?Empking wrote:Its not his opinion its his choice to lurk.
You killed Zwet for the same reason any of us would have killed you: because you're both terrible players that act impulsively and rarely, if ever, provide actual content.Empking wrote:It doesn't have anything to do with alignment. (Unless you're saying Zwet was obv-town.)
I wanted to ask something simple so there could be no excuse for not answerring.lobstermania wrote:Asking a question that isn't game related doesn't seem like the best idea. Why didn't you ask something relevant?Empking wrote:Its not his opinion its his choice to lurk.
And that makes me scum because...You killed Zwet for the same reason any of us would have killed you: because you're both terrible players that act impulsively and rarely, if ever, provide actual content.Empking wrote:It doesn't have anything to do with alignment. (Unless you're saying Zwet was obv-town.)
I see no reason why you couldn't be both scum and a one shot vig via your box.