Newbie 810 - Game over!

geekalicious · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:57 am

xRECKONERx wrote:Today is referencing this game day. As in Day 1 of the game.

Ah.... Alright, I see now. Thanks for the correction.

Zachrulez · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:57 am

I also don't like how Kraut comfortably stated that my player slot was town when TFGM dropped out.

If I try to be unbiased about TFGM, if I were to play in any other seat, I would find his actions to be null tells. I wouldn't feel very comfortable calling him town at all.

Also to be noted that the only players that can be certain of TFGM's alignment at this point are myself and scum.

Zachrulez · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:02 am

geekalicious wrote:
xRECKONERx wrote:Today is referencing this game day. As in Day 1 of the game.
Ah.... Alright, I see now. Thanks for the correction.

That was an interesting exchange.

geekalicious · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:22 am

Zachrulez wrote:That was an interesting exchange.

How so?

Zachrulez · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:38 am

geekalicious wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:That was an interesting exchange.
How so?

Interesting from the point of view that I think it makes you two less likely to be scum together.

ronnieroo · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:03 am

They could be scum trying to seperate themselves from one another. Since this is a noobie game I find it unlikley... but just saying.

Zachrulez · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:07 am

Strange that you would entertain that train of thought while you're apparently suspicious of me.

Zachrulez · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:08 am

On the subject of Ronnieroo, I need to re-read her posts and see if I can better my read on her.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:10 am

I have an experimental idea...

Everyone type out their top three scum candidates, but only post your #3. Do not post your top two.

Zachrulez · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:14 am

Reckoner and Geek are pretty close to tied for #3 for me. I guess if I made an effort to break the tie I'd say... Geek.

You guys were my top two, but you've fallen down a bit on re-reading.

Zachrulez · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:15 am

Who's your number 3 Reckoner?

ronnieroo · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:26 am

Zachrulez wrote:Strange that you would entertain that train of thought while you're apparently suspicious of me.

How is it strange?

Zachrulez · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:37 am

Because that comment seems to have the intent of wanting to increase suspicion in response to a statement I made that was designed to try to deflate some.

I don't really get why you felt it important to counter my statement, given that I'm fully capable of being wrong, and also because I didn't state as an absolute that they can't be scum together.

It's a statement designed to intentionally fuel suspicion over a specific possibility without openly supporting that possibility.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:41 am

My #3 is TFGM.

Zachrulez · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:42 am

You mean me.

geekalicious · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:12 am

I'm going to have to go back through the posts and do an analysis to name my #3. For now, I'd like to

Unvote

though. BlueRaven has recently actually started contributing to the conversation instead of lurking vaguely behind the "I'm a newbie excuse." Though BlueRaven's initial screw-ups still have him on my radar, the case against him doesn't feel as strong now.

ronnieroo · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:18 pm

Zach there are mafia that do that in other games. You'll note I said it was unlikley.
If these people continue playing mafia they're bound to run into a pair of mafia goons that will attempt to do this.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:38 pm

Yes, it's a technique commonly known as "bussing", when two members of the same scumteam attack each other to distance themselves.

Zachrulez · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:50 pm

ronnieroo wrote:Zach there are mafia that do that in other games. You'll note I said it was unlikley.
If these people continue playing mafia they're bound to run into a pair of mafia goons that will attempt to do this.

Yeah, I'm well aware, I've seen it and experienced it...

ronnieroo · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:13 pm

And you still don't want me to point it out?

Zachrulez · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:22 pm

ronnieroo wrote:Zach there are mafia that do that in other games. You'll note I said it was unlikley.
If these people continue playing mafia they're bound to run into a
pair of mafia goons
that will attempt to do this.

I was looking to respond to the most recent post, but then I caught this.

What makes you say this?

Zachrulez · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:25 pm

Vote: Ronnieroo

Zachrulez · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:36 pm

And if you need anymore than 341 to feel confident that Ronnieroo is scum, continuing to drag this matter through the mud serves to accomplish nothing but distracting us from scumhunting.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:43 pm

Pair of Mafia Goons = scumslip. Win.

Vote: ronnieroo

ronnieroo · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:11 pm

What exactly if your reasoning there?