Jammer: Maybe BM vs Alexhans got a bit personal. But there's the fact that he pushed my case trying to appear convinced all the time only to uvote later. Many of the things he tried to use as arguments were just fluff. He is an important suspect but with so few input from many other players that's hardly conclusive. I want everybody to play before I decide who must get lynched.
HI KMD!
VP Baltar wrote:
I have recently discovered that Mastin's scum meta is to fall behind and lurk. I might not be opposed to his lynch given I have seen this prove accurate twice.
I think it can be a null tell for now. He may be trying to catch up. He replaced into a game I co-modded where he posted several times saying he was going to catch up but that he was busy and was finally killed at night without having said anything relevant to the game. 791 Beard Mafia.
camn wrote:I support ANY lurkerlynch.
YET. Unlike you, you never jumped on lurkers like broomhead and don't vote for them now.
I didn't read mastin's posts but I assume he was catching up...
Mod: Prod him, please...
GIEFF wrote:
I just realized that my Monday and your Monday are different things... stupid spherical Earth.
lol.
VP Baltar wrote:
Ah yeah, sorry. Timezone differences didn't occur to me. Oh well, check out the links I provided and you can see that as scum he isn't a very good player. He falls behind and promises to catch up but really just continues to lurk.
Again. Look at
Beard Mafia.. How many games have you metaed?
Kmd4390 wrote:Hi. Who is scum?
probably you.
KMD...did you even read before voting Cephir?
Kairyuu wrote:Mmk. You've passed the test.
Apparently you didn't notice, but this is a Mountainous setup. If you had claimed a power role you would be confirmed scum. That you didn't means that you were either not willing to risk a counterclaim, or that you are actually town.
Kai... how do we know she didn't notice? Is she town then?
Sensfan wrote:
Mastin, alex, jammer, GIEFF.
There's at least one, if not two or all three, in there.
I think IRC would suit you man... You don't say anything and yet expect us to think you have a reason.
Since when you suspect Mastin???
SensFan wrote:
All you people asking me to write novels about why I suspect who I do, its not going to happen. This is how I play, and I'm right a whole lot more often than I was when I wrote novels.
ok...
Not giving reasons why you vote is like never leaving RVS...
SensFan wrote:
Besides, I think I've made it fairly obvious why I suspect all 4 of the above. If you really have no idea, read the thread. If you still have no idea, and you've done what you feel is enough looking into the matter on your own, then you can ask me.
Using other people's arguments to suspect people...
Being so unhelpful you're not a good asset to town. You could hide forever behind this crappy attitude. Not willing to let that happen.
Vote SensFan
Zach wrote:Why suspicious of Mastin all of the sudden? I don't see you state any reasons why he is scum.
let's say it is convenient for him... He admits that he votes for him because he is on the biggest waggon.
jammer wrote:Meh, that is quite clear.
SensFan says he agrees with the reasoning others gave(in the thread), between his last 2 posts. He is sheeping on the new insights on Mastin.
dude... since when we allow players to just state vaguely that they agree with others in general and then vote without giving a single reason for their random banter. He continually uses his supposed skills to excuse his lack of scumhunting and participation.
Mastin is at L-2, by the way. Just in case 2 people "don't notice" in succession.
I'm back...