In post 256, I wrote:My main suspects left from day one are Dvd, Fernando, Kmd with the possible addition of Darkstrike. I've looked at the case against Zach but I can't really see it.
I've finally got round to following this up. Sorry about the long post.
Dvd
: Post 24 - appeasement. Post 77 - entirely agrees with Fernando; buddying perhaps? Then draws attention to two out of several lurkers. Why those two? Post 94 - Worried about Fern getting lynched. Post 100 - picks out another lurker, Lazarus this time, but isn't going to say whether his lack of content is good or bad! Post 116 - more lurker-hunting rather than scum-hunting.
In post 184, dvdkid13 wrote:As for all the suspicion building on Kise: I've been in a game with this situation before and i can tell whats happening. One person, (Kise in this case) is being pressured into submission by other players and in an attempt to defend himself, his arguments get less coherent and his logic makes less sense and so he ends up being lynched but he was town.
I'm not necessarily saying that Kise is town or not. But i do approve of the Kise wagon (even though he is not the person who i am most suspicious of) because hopefully we can get more posts from him so that i can make a more educated decision. I just don't think i would approve of a Kise lynch at this point
Dvd agrees with the pressure being put on Kise while acknowledging the possible adverse result, but wants to disassociate himself from the actual lynch. Compare his approval of this wagon to his reaction (posts 92 and 94) to Fernando getting two votes.
Fernando/killa seven
: Fernando's first four posts were about timezones, apart from a random vote for KMD. He made a comment about Zazie's picture which he then said was just a joke and asked Khamisa if she was joking about wanting to be voted to get her name pink. He voted me for acting on a gut feeling. Seemed to be looking for reasons to vote people rather than looking for scum. Killa seven hasn't added anything yet.
KMD
: Post 87 - townie claim.
In post 199, Kmd4390 wrote:Zach:
-Put Kise at L-2 for weak reasons ...
Zach's vote was actually L-3, not L-2. Zach points this out but KMD does not acknowledge it either then or when referring back to the case on day two.
Kise makes some good points about KMD in post 211 although differences in playstyle and terminology are confusing the issues a bit in that and subseqent posts.
In post 233, Kmd4390 wrote:Good to see that Ash is town.
What prompted you to say this?
Kmd4390 wrote:Zach wrote:A few theories pop into mind about why KMD is behaving this way, all of which involve him being scum.
OMGUS much?
Zach wrote:Unvote: Vote: KMD
Yep, OMGUS.
It's not OMGUS if he has reasons other than the fact that you are attacking him.
What is your case against Darkstrike? You've said he's scummy but not much else.
@ Zach: Can you elaborate on the theories please?
Darkstrike
:
In post 81, Darkstrike_11 wrote:what are everyone's favourite alignments? I should think I would prefer a mafia role, as it would be fun to manipulate the unknowing townies.
Did anyone else get excited at being told that they were a policeman as their role before finding out that its actually a vanilla town role?
and finally, has anyone played in a game with more than one mafia group, and if so are there any different scum tells?
Townie claim, and was he asking for guidance as to what to avoid as scum?
In post 84, Darkstrike_11 wrote:I'd FOS KMD, but I'm not even 40% sure about him.
Distancing? In fact I think there is mutual distancing between DS and KMD.
In post 86, Darkstrike_11 wrote:As soon as I post people start suspecting me. As i'm town I naturally start suspecting the people who accuse me, ...
Another townie claim. As this is a two scum group game this suspecting would happen whether he was town or scum so the claim seems to be added for effect.
In post 200, Darkstrike_11 wrote:Of course I implied town.
...
I wasn’t claiming to be a policeman. Nor was I giving the impression of being one. I was just being light hearted about the name of the townie role in this game.
He seems to be contradicting himself within the same post here. And the words "anyone else" in post 81 clearly imply that he received the townie pm.
In post 269, Darkstrike_11 wrote:I have ideas of people who are scummy. I have reasons too. But if I told you, would you take them seriously? I severely doubt it. Once someone has the scum-tinted glasses on, nothing appears pro town.
Can we see these please? Sharing your thoughts will help you a lot more than defensiveness or resignation. It will also help the rest of us to make up ours minds about you and others.
In post 312, Darkstrike_11 wrote:fine, I'll stay in to let you mislynch me, rather than let some unfortunate soul replace into my situation
I think this kind of comment would normally be more likely to come from a townie but ... could he be trying a bit of WIFOM here?
I still don't see the case against Zach.
I made a note some time back that if Kise is town then Furry is scum but I need to work out why I thought that.
What worries me is that there are still some for whom I don't have any read at all.
Conclusions
:
Dvd is probable scum linked with Fernando or possibly Furry.
Fernando is possible scum but no obvious links apart from the one from Dvd and a slight connection with KMD.
KMD, possible scum with DS (mutual distancing) or maybe even Zach (bussing then switching vote when deadline is near).
Darkstrike, less sure about him but if KMD flips scum I'll think it more likely.
Vote: Dvd
Mod: What happened to the vote-count in post 190? It looks like you replaced it with the first vote-count from day two
killa seven wrote:This game needs tons of replacements.
This game needs your comments on who you think are scum.
.
