Why is attacking a playstyle on of the scummiest things you can do? It can also be a very pro-town move in such instances at Iericent has describe in two posts above me.Furry wrote:Do not like the way Y is defending falco. Its not that he is defending, but how. There is a point where he says that he is reading into it wrong, then present the "right" way to do it. There is no right way. Everyone has their own way of playing the game and getting tells and pressuring, attacking, defending. Some people play abbrasive, some you dont notice, some bulldog on something they think is a scumtell. Attacking a playstyle is about one of the scummiest things you can do. The additon of a very bad analogy to make the point stronger is weak as well.
I believe the case has evolved from just this. It is no longer just PMs but what Falko has saidOk, for this whole flaco-sajin thing, its completely a two way street. I looked at this from a completely detached standpoint, and here is the basic arguement from what I am seeing
Sajin: Falco was talking with partners pre-game. PMs suggest it
Falco: No I wasnt, stop tunneling, you are scum for tunneling.
Falko has considered others as a better lynch. He has expressed a suspicion of me as scum. Also Ash.Both of you are playing with blinders on. I am guilty of this at times, everyone is, but this is SO FREAKING BLATANT. I dont think either of you are even considering that the other could be town, or that there could be a better lynch.
Please explain why you are now waining on Falco. Also explain why you think Sajin is town and why you stated such.This is what creates problems in games, when people present a false dilemma and it start dominating the game. I still think that Sajin is town, and am actually waining a bit on falco.
How did you get all of this?There is a saying that "A drunk mans words are a sober mans thoughts". I scratched out some more notes after my post last night, and found Ash as the scummiest and flaco as about at 55% (I work as 50% is unknown, 60%+ is vote, 75%+ is day vig). Maybe everyone should kick back, have a few drinks and reread, it does give you a different perspective.
Furry wrote:Lalala I like telling scum who to kill.
Zeik never directly calls Sajin town for catching Falko. He calls him town for his "mofo logic" And he does vote Falco as his first post whichWoo! ZH scummy too. He posts similar to ash in the sense of "can not take a solid stance". He calls Sajin town for catching falco (and here I cant even recall ZH trying to get falco lynched), then he starts going back the other way. Sure Sajin could be scum, he would be sorry, but he could be scum. More failure to take a clear and percise stance.
How is this post scum? In context, it seems perfectly fine.Ok so we have a Ash-ZH scum pairing here. 162 by Ash just screams scum.
Game links?First Ash says that flaco is scummy, then he says that SSK and ZH are scummy for voting him wagon-like (that was not blatant wagon, you need to read some games with blatant wagon then compare).
But given the oppurtunity to be able to speak to others private, and get more of an isolation read on them which can effect your read later. Why not talk to them?I actually somewhat agree with ZA. I likely would of not said anything N0 outside of a "hi" if someone contacted me. I dont know what I will say N1, if much at all. Just because a mechanich exists doesnt mean that you have to use it, there are many situations where not using your power can be better for the town, even in this game. Think if you are a RB and you have town reads on your neighbors, why would you use it?
Where has ZA made a logical argument?lol ZA is funny.Cant really read him well, but I would bet towngiven that he is making and sticking to logical arguements in the face of getting votes. People who are voting him for making sense make none. Claiming on the other hand... not so good. I bet you he is a GS though. So one more name up on the town list.
Also this is the part of the post that I talked about in the post before this one. The bolded statement. You say he's Obvtown with no other reasoning besides that one.
Also who are the people who are voting for him for making sense?
Why do you give an opinion on the GS claim?
Why is it not smart? Why should we not lynch lurkers on D2? Could we lynch lurkers D1?Look at 204. SO MUCH FENCESITTING. Lurkers shouldnt be lynched, we should lynch scummy, but the longer they lurk the scummier they get. So basically we lynch lurkers D2, really not smart at all.
It was a fair vote.Also trying to get SSK lynched for voting ZA is almost as stupid as voting ZA.
Where'd he post that things should be random?Really bad speculation on Ash's behalf too. If we are going to play this 100% random, there is a 38% you are next to two town, 57% one scum 5% two scum. What role you have should NOT AT ALL effect your thoughts on who you are next too.
Also, your role might sometimes effect your thoughts on who you are next too.
I have to agree with this. It was a vote based purely on WIFOM and trying to encourage a person. This deserves anIce puts a weak reasoning vote on Sajin.
Are you 1349388493% sure that he's scum off of such a little case?Thats all for now, for seriously though, why arent we killing Ash? If I could day vig him right now I would be doing that.