Ok, this has gone to ridiculous speed:
876 wrote:Unvote Mastin
I suspect alex and camn are buddies.
I asked them both questions about the other
Alex claims to find camn scummy, claims to want to save Mastin, yet refuses to vote her to do so. Hmm.
I also asked camn if she would prefer a Mastin or alex lynch, and she chose Mastin.
882" wrote:
I hope everybody agrees that this is a shocking amount of coaching, a shocking amount of defense, and a very lame pretense of finding camn scummy.
Alex had a chance to vote for a player he CLAIMS to find scummy, with a significant number of people behind her lynch, in order to stave off the lynch of another player he CLAIMS to find townie, but instead chooses to vote for Battle Mage, because apparently other people defending camn confuses him.
If I can't convince you guys to lynch camn today, can we please lynch alex instead?
892 wrote:Do you agree that alex was coaching camn?
Do you think a townie would coach anybody as much as alex has coached camn, regardless of camn's alignment?
I admit it was my suspicion of camn (and BM's accusation of coaching) that first got me to dig back and look at all this stuff, but it's pretty clear that when camn does something scummy, alex mentions it to either tell her to stop, or just warn her that her behavior is scummy. His quotes speak for themselves. He threw her on a couple scum-lists for appearances, but his refusal to wagon her to save Mastin lends credence to my theory that it's just distancing.
And as camn says, alex's excuse for not voting camn to save Mastin ("people defending her is WIFOM-y!") rings pretty hollow.
896 wrote:Which do you think would incriminate alex
more
at this point - Mastin-town or Mastin-scum?
So, lets parse this out:
1.) Alex and Camn are scum together.
2.) Alex is scum regardless of camn's alignment.
3.) Alex is incriminated regardless of Mastin's alignment.
4.) Alex wants to "save" Mastin, but is unwilling to vote Camn.
A few things:
1 & 2 don't really jive. Thats a pretty solid case of having your cake and eating it too. 3 follows this pattern. 4 makes far more sense IF Mastin & Alex are scum together than if Alex is scum and Mastin is town.
So, in essence, 4 is saying that Alex, Mastin and Camn are scum together and Alex is trying to save one partner but not by voting for the other.
Welp, case closed I guess.
Which begs the case if this thought process is true why would you unvote Mastin to vote Alex IF they are scum together? Its mountainous - one scum is just as good as another.
However, if GIEFF is scum and this is a whole pot of fail this makes far more sense.
- If Mastin is scum then GIEFF buys him another day by shifting the wagon.
- If Mastin is town then GIEFF leaves an obvious mislynch for another day.
So, we go around the horn. I'll vote Mastin, but I'd rather see a GIEFF wagon.
Vote: GIEFF