So this is a random vote to get the guy to claim?
Now what happens?
And could you please explain why we shouldn't have a no lynch vote? Because from what I see, this first day we have no info at all to go on. And like you said, we're more likely to lynch a townie than a mafia dude. That's what the guys on the game I was watching said too, but they didn't really explain it.unvote: iamausernam
I'd like to know too.startransmission wrote:If you're going to break out an OMGUS at least write something.BagSquad wrote:>:(iamausername wrote:Unvote, Vote: BagSquad. Based on what everyone has posted so far, he seems most likely to be scum.
Vote:iamausername
I do want to know what iamusername found especially scummy about your earlier posts though.
Sorry, like I explained before, I got confused because the game I watched was on a different site and themed (vampires or something), and for some reason I thought you were supposed to claim. I have read the main guide now though, and some other stuff.Why would you think a random vote would lead to a claim? It would be random, if you just chose someone. You didn't.
You said this:
bouchedufou wrote:
Yippee! Started!
So this is a random vote to get the guy to claim?
vote- iamausernam
Now what happens?
You said, in more or less words, that you want this person to claim, therefore making your random vote, a non-random vote. Your statement can be taken as you are scum and want to know what username's role is so you know whether or not he's worth it to vote for or NK.
I'm not bouncing my votes around- the first one I didn't really know what I was supposed to do, the second one I was trying to get Jeromus to respond. And once he did and explained himself, I unvoted him. No other votes. After that, I was careful not to vote too often, despite my suspicions of Baggy.You are also bouncing around your votes quite a bit. You need to be careful of that, it's normally typical of scum to bounce around on different wagons.
Maybe ignore is the wrong word, but read one of my earlier posts. I'm basically saying that until he reacts, it's pointless for us to focus on baggy. We'll be bogged down on somebody who we'll probably lynch anyway, when instead we could be examining someone else. If he replies, we should definitely pay attention, but right now? Our time would be better spent turning up the heat rather than sitting around congratulating ourselves.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:bouchedufou wrote:The problem as I see it is, now we're pretty much back to the random stage. Very few solid leads apart from baggy, and he's not doing anything to defend himself. Therefore, I think we should ignore baggy unless he speaks up as we've still got 3 weeks to go over.
How is ignoring him going to help? If he's town, he's not helping us win the game and he's not living up to his win condition. If he's scum, you're giving him a free pass. Ignoring him is the worst thing we can do. Bag either needs to answer the questions asked of him, or get replaced so we can have someone in there who is willing to, you know,play the game.
I'm not using it as an excuse, I was annoyed that hiphop didn't bother reading through all the posts, and I was explaining again why I might be asking what you guys seem to think to be pretty stupid questions. Allow me to say again:Bouched, you can only use the "I am new" excuse for so long. You are also using this excuse against another new player to this site which brings you no merit. Your reasoning here says nothing about you being confused about hiphop's experience:
@ iamusername What makes you think that bouched is more likely town than Maemuki?
Just because he said he has only played themed base games, doesn't qualify him as non-mafia.(bold added for emphasis)
He also targeted me first, after I only made 1 post.
Therefore,
unvote
vote:bouchedufou
1. I wasn't being vindictive. I felt suspicious of hiphop, while I was reading through even before reaching his vote on me. Why? First he voted for iama with no explanation, reason, nothing. Then when iama voted for startran, he switched over and followed along. Then he switched to me. I was told, and I agree, that votes shouldn't be just swapped like hotcakes. If I might add, I was feeling slightly suspicious since before reading his vote for me, I only added that last part to highlight the possibility that I might be biased. Also, hiphop wasn't my main suspicion at the time- I was more worried about Jeromus because of his fewer posts due to recharging problems.I think you are being very vindictive because he is now voting for you. It seems as though you are overreacting because he found you out.
bouchedufou wrote:
@hiphop again: Like I asked the first time, you say you want a response from people. What response do you want from me? In the same vein, what response did you want from This vote doesn't even seem to be targeted at trying to get information. Now you're randomly voting around because I asked some questions (although you did think I was targeting you) and you didn't like me?
Why do you think a vote should only be used to garner information? It seems that hiphop senses that he found scum and is therefore voting for the scummiest player in his eyes, which is what a person should do. You are accusing him of randomly voting around. His vote on you isn't at all random. Did you not read his post? He gave a reason as to why he was voting you.
Why don't you go back and re-read a bit before your next post. We are only on page 5 and it seems like you already need to re-read what has taken place.
Why do you think a vote should only be used to garner information? It seems that hiphop senses that he found scum and is therefore voting for the scummiest player in his eyes, which is what a person should do. You are accusing him of randomly voting around.His vote on you isn't at all random. Did you not read his post? He gave a reason as to why he was voting you.
The reason I said you seemed almost town is because that point about P/S was quite interesting, in my opinion. Notice the almost- it doesn't make you any less scummy, it's just that I felt this was a valid point to have been made, even if you were still jumping around. However, those suspicions still remain. No-one else seems to think a P/S pair is likely. I don't think Starbuck is scummy. So I'll stick with you.Oh, so someone that is almost town can be scum. Interesting point. That was sarcasm.
explanation,iamausername wrote:Considering he was voting BagSquad at the time, this does not sit well with me.startransmission wrote:as soon as momentum went against Bagsquad, this game got very very quiet. It wreaks of scum sitting on thier hands and waiting for day two.
Just something I thought was interesting, maybe keep that in mind. I'm about a third of the way through, but I'll continue later.iama wrote:You weren't just voting for BagSquad, you were simultaneously voting for BagSquad and suggesting that scum were trying to get BagSquad lynched. That's what I have a problem with.