MtG: Parallel Universe Mafia (fl's subgame): Game Over

ZazieR · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:59 pm

Here

ZazieR · Post Post #20 (isolation #1) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:37 am

Vote Flava

FoS Tajo

Both know the reasons

ZazieR · Post Post #22 (isolation #2) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 7:03 am

Because you made our 'first and only random vote ever' a 'first random vote ever'. Now, it has lost some of its specialness

Now, it's the 'first and only random FoS ever'

ZazieR · Post Post #24 (isolation #3) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 7:11 am

That's the most obv soft-claim ever.

ZazieR · Post Post #28 (isolation #4) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 7:52 am

I wouldn't be too surprised if it was a scum gambit.
So I'm going to watch both of them to see if it's the truth or not.

ZazieR · Post Post #29 (isolation #5) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 7:56 am

The only thing is that it's testable. By sending them to one place together, it will be shown as the truth or a lie.

ZazieR · Post Post #34 (isolation #6) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:09 am

1. Which is why we should look first at their behaviours and what they say.
2. I think it was somewhere stated. Will look.

ZazieR · Post Post #35 (isolation #7) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:09 am

Papa Zito wrote:And I still want a roleclaim.

This.

ZazieR · Post Post #37 (isolation #8) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:10 am

Abilities may cause a player to change subgames (this can cause subgames to have more players than they started in), though players cannot be changed into a subgame that has ended. Factions with factional kills may kill one player each {period} in any subgame one of their members is in, but factions with factional communication (i.e, Mafia) may communicate with all other members of their faction outside the thread regardless of alignment.

ZazieR · Post Post #38 (isolation #9) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:12 am

In other words, if we can get one of Tar's or FL's subgame to end before on of Benmage or DDD move to the other, they can't fulfill their win condition if they are telling the truth, right?
I think we should aim for that.

ZazieR · Post Post #40 (isolation #10) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:16 am

<22> Whenever a player wins or loses the game, that player will be removed from the game.

If they are telling the truth, one of them will lose when one of Tar's or FL's subgame ends. So it seems that the other will then be removed if they are telling the truth.
In other words, this will be worked out eventually. We don't need to test the claim by putting them together in one game.

ZazieR · Post Post #42 (isolation #11) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:18 am

I guess that works as well.
It still brings us that the claim is test-able without putting them together.

ZazieR · Post Post #44 (isolation #12) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:19 am

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:ZazieR doesn't have the town win condition.

And you think that because?

ZazieR · Post Post #46 (isolation #13) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:20 am

Just explain it in your own words.

ZazieR · Post Post #50 (isolation #14) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:28 am

I disagree Sajin.
As said already, time will eventually tell if they are lying or not. As shown in your topic, you are going to get rid of Benmage. If he's lying, DDD is lying as well and we can lynch him. If Benmage is telling the truth, DDD will most likely be removed.
Just because I have a different approach to get rid of a different faction, doesn't make me scum.

ZazieR · Post Post #51 (isolation #15) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:29 am

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Papa Zito wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:ZazieR doesn't have the town win condition.
You're avoiding the roleclaim. This makes me highly suspicious.
I already claimed my role...

Name?

ZazieR · Post Post #53 (isolation #16) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:29 am

Daytalk?

ZazieR · Post Post #56 (isolation #17) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:34 am

DDD

Benmage just mentioned a safe-claim. Can you elaborate?

ZazieR · Post Post #57 (isolation #18) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:40 am

Sajin

, Vino just quoted from our game already.

ZazieR · Post Post #58 (isolation #19) » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:47 am

Sajin

It seems that Benmage has something to say. I'll respond to your post when he has said what.

ZazieR · Post Post #287 (isolation #20) » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:03 am

Will get to posting tomorrow. Got rather busy.

ZazieR · Post Post #389 (isolation #21) » Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:57 am

Prodded. Meh, have to catch up in 2/3 more games. So I'll most likely post an analysis of the first ten pages tomorrow.

Works. Unreplaced

ZazieR · Post Post #421 (isolation #22) » Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:42 am

Sorry, didn't post for two/three days at MS >.<
Will get at least a bit of analysis done tomorrow as I need to get caught up in my other games as well.