You rang?SpyreX wrote: KMD I could also get behind for the same thing but he doesn't have this amazing habit of showing up when called upon.
Better hope Vi isn't a dayvig.GIEFF wrote: THANK YOU YAW AND VI!!!!
What did you do in the 6 minutes between this post and the one before it?GIEFF wrote:vote Sensfan
lol best Chapelle's Show ever.Benmage wrote:BYAHHGo Vi!
How would saying you should have been NK'd keep you as a viable lynch?GIEFF wrote: And wouldn't scum also try tokeepmy mislynch viable by, just as an example, saying that I should have been nightkilled if I were town?
I saw him (GIEFF) as lynchable on Day 1.Battle Mage wrote: But, you see, nobody really saw you as lynchable until today. Your argument will only kick in from tonight onwards, and ours is valid NOW.
Possibly. Zach and Jammer are possible too.alexhans wrote:KMD (When he comes back): I take that you think now that it's BM+Alex+GIEFF?
25% of 16 players is 4 scum, right? And without power roles, 3 scum would make the game town-heavy.alexhans wrote:I see that he wrote that 4 of 6 players were scum. I thought I was practically the only one who thought about 4 scum.
So you knew Kai remained active as scum in that game, and so figured that replacing out of this game was a towntell?Battle Mage wrote:Also, i'd like to direct your attention to my game - Mean Mod LoveFest, in the Theme Park. Where Kairyuu has just flipped scum.
THAT is why i couldnt cite the meta until now. And THAT is why i felt that Kairyuu, and hence, BCC, were very unlikely to be scum.
Exactly. It isnt foolproof logic, but as i acknowledged the day after the Cephrir lynch, i was feeling adamant in the face of your opposition that my read was right. Especially after the same thing happened with Mastin earlier. Not only was he active as scum in that game, he was active in what seemed like a virtually unwinnable scenario after Day 1. I dont see him getting replaced out of here as scum. He seems to relish a challenge, and speaking to him recently, he evidently has a preference for playing as scum, over town.GIEFF wrote:So you knew Kai remained active as scum in that game, and so figured that replacing out of this game was a towntell?Battle Mage wrote:Also, i'd like to direct your attention to my game - Mean Mod LoveFest, in the Theme Park. Where Kairyuu has just flipped scum.
THAT is why i couldnt cite the meta until now. And THAT is why i felt that Kairyuu, and hence, BCC, were very unlikely to be scum.
right...GIEFF wrote:And your opposition was making me more adamant as well, especially because you couldn't give your bcc/Kai read, and because you kept misinterpreting my argument.
I understand your reasoning now, and can see how it would make sense from a townie's perspective. I still don't like the fact that you tried to defend yourself with your absence from the wagon, or that you kept trying to claim I was on your side of the meta-analysis, but the "magical meta" argument is laid to rest as far as I am concerned.
Sorry to repeat myself again BM, but while you're here: were you aware of your heavy usage of "honestly" already, or did you have to iso-read yourself to check?
Bullshit, just because I don't produce the spew that so many in this game have doesn't mean I've not been playing. And your attempts to push for my lynch based on playstyle grounds or Ben's unspecified meta arguments are incredibly poor and a little insulting as well. You don't think I consider these things when I'm starting a new game?SpyreX wrote:The nature of his lurking is the issue at hand. He's here. He's choosing not to play. He's came out and OMGUS'd me based on moon logic.
Which irony?Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Bullshit, just because I don't produce the spew that so many in this game have doesn't mean I've not been playing. And your attempts to push for my lynch based on playstyle grounds or Ben's unspecified meta arguments are incredibly poor and a little insulting as well. You don't think I consider these things when I'm starting a new game?SpyreX wrote:The nature of his lurking is the issue at hand. He's here. He's choosing not to play. He's came out and OMGUS'd me based on moon logic.
Also lulz @ Sens, the irony cake is delicious.
There is a continent between "producing spew" and "not lurking".Bullshit, just because I don't produce the spew that so many in this game have doesn't mean I've not been playing. And your attempts to push for my lynch based on playstyle grounds or Ben's unspecified meta arguments are incredibly poor and a little insulting as well. You don't think I consider these things when I'm starting a new game?
The only case that's been made against me is "oh nos Danny is lurking", you come in and say I'm scum with no new reasons so I have to assume that's your primary reason. Except you've done mostly the same thing (yes I know you had V/LA for some of the time) which makes that argument hilariously dubious coming from you.SensFan wrote:Which irony?Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Bullshit, just because I don't produce the spew that so many in this game have doesn't mean I've not been playing. And your attempts to push for my lynch based on playstyle grounds or Ben's unspecified meta arguments are incredibly poor and a little insulting as well. You don't think I consider these things when I'm starting a new game?SpyreX wrote:The nature of his lurking is the issue at hand. He's here. He's choosing not to play. He's came out and OMGUS'd me based on moon logic.
Also lulz @ Sens, the irony cake is delicious.
Bullshit...DDD you are useless this game. You might be more useless than Cephrir was.SpyreX wrote: As an aside: I am definitely not trying to be personally insulting. Thats not my mantra. This is simply a function of your play THIS game.
Except, you know, I haven't lurked at all this game.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:The only case that's been made against me is "oh nos Danny is lurking", you come in and say I'm scum with no new reasons so I have to assume that's your primary reason. Except you've done mostly the same thing (yes I know you had V/LA for some of the time) which makes that argument hilariously dubious coming from you.SensFan wrote:Which irony?Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Bullshit, just because I don't produce the spew that so many in this game have doesn't mean I've not been playing. And your attempts to push for my lynch based on playstyle grounds or Ben's unspecified meta arguments are incredibly poor and a little insulting as well. You don't think I consider these things when I'm starting a new game?SpyreX wrote:The nature of his lurking is the issue at hand. He's here. He's choosing not to play. He's came out and OMGUS'd me based on moon logic.
Also lulz @ Sens, the irony cake is delicious.
DDD is scummiest.Benmage wrote:SF, why haven't you voted anyone? What are you waiting for? Whose scummiest for you?
I'm curious why are withholding the vote...even if you did vote he'd only be at L-2. You said he was scummiest. You didn't vote him, why not?SensFan wrote:DDD is scummiest.Benmage wrote:SF, why haven't you voted anyone? What are you waiting for? Whose scummiest for you?
Why are you rushing me to vote?
Comparing yourself to SF's to prove you aren't a lurker is comical.. That woulda been bcc tell cephrir he wasn't a lurker.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Ben, you think maybe if I throw a small fit and self-vote maybe you clowns would see reason?
Sens, I have more posts than you over days two and three and half the people here seem to think I'm the worst lurker of all-time, you fo the math.