Open 156 - Friends and Enemies - Game Over before 816

[Exalt]

But maybe staying off my wagon and going after DDD would make him look good after I flip town. Scum Exalt thinking that someone else would drop the hammer on me.

Here comes another 180.
After reading Exalt's and DDD's recent posts over and over I actually believe DDD. Exalt could very well be the big shot scum here.

unvote, Vote:Exalt

Explain. If you cannot, then don't vote. Thanks. I have no problem lynching you at deadline, because I don't see zazier as scum.

Vote Count #18

Tick Tock, five days to deadline.

Raivann (3) - ZazieR, ConfidAnon, Sho Minamimoto
Exalt (3) - ekiM, Debonair Danny DiPietro, Raivann
ZazieR (2) - itacv2, Santos
Debonair Danny DiPietro (1) - Exalt
Toro (1) - muzzz
Santos (1) - Toro

[Exalt]

Oh, I see what you did there. I have 3 votes now along with zazier and Raivann


I'm regular townie, so go ahead and vote me. Town won't be happy with the result, but I'm sure you scum newbs will. DDD is scummy as fuck, and will get lynched soon enough I did my job at stating my case.

Raivann, explain why you wanted to vote for someone from the itacv wagon and YOUR wagon, and now switch to me? If you are saving your own ass, I can understand, yet voting for me and saying "I BELIEVE DDD" is pretty fucking scummy after you flip flopped around about 50 times on day 1.

You vote DDD, then you vote Exalt after seeing DDD vote Exalt. Great job. I think you noticed that Ekim already had a vote on me, and you are hoping to help DDD out now.

Well, w/e I did my case from my reread, which I am positive none of you did. I am still waiting for a case from DDD.

You tried saying I fabricated information which I did not at all. I reread the thread and stated the truth. Let the rest of town decide.

[ConfidAnon]

Something I just thought of: DDDscum had no reason to OMGUS Exalt like that. He could have defended himself against the case and said that Ravann (who already had a decent wagon) was scummier and needed to be lynched today (because I assume that DDD wouldn't be bussing this early.)

I know it's wifom, but it makes more since if DDD was scum to stay on Raivann than it would to vote Exalt. Therefore I don't think he should be lynched today. Out of Raivann and Exalt, I think Raivann is far scummier.

[Exalt]

So no one agrees that it is scummy what DDD did in trying to get 3 quicklynch bandwagons going on 3 seperate players? No one thinks that? I find that quite odd.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

So no one agrees that it is scummy what DDD did in trying to get 3 quicklynch bandwagons going on 3 seperate players? No one thinks that? I find that quite odd.

So your strategy is to keep repeating the same lies as if I didn't just refute them. I guess if you keep repeating them then maybe someone will get confused and actually believe them. I guess you've got to do things like this when you don't have the truth on your side.

[ekiM]

@muzzz, Cliff Notes version: itacv2 got a wagon on him and claimed masons (with toro). No CC so it's true. Now there are wagons on Raivann and Exalt. Kind of one on Zazie, who seems to have vanished? And Exalt is trying to start a wagon on DDD.

[Alduskkel]

itacv2 has been prodded.

[muzzz]

If Toro is a mason, I should

unvote

.

[ekiM]

Exalt's case on DDD is really overblown. The first request for votes on Raivann was never going to lead to a quicklynch, and I believe he said he was looking for reactions. The vote on itacv2 was fine, dude was suspicious. Nothing to do with a quicklynch. The vote on Exalt for not contributing, same story, fine vote, no quicklynch in sight.

Also Exalt repeatedly called Raivann scummy during his analysis then at the end said everyone should unvote him, and it's only based on him being a lurker? Huh? This is a pretty glaring inconsistency. Explain please.

His rhetoric in the last few posts doesn't sit well with me.

Confide makes a great point on why would DDD move his to Exalt if he was scum? I don't agree Raivann is hugely scummy though... his play hasn't been great but he's coming off more like a townie putting in a poor performance right now.

I think DDD and Zazie are town and I think Exalt looks worse than Raivann right now. Happy with my vote.

[ekiM]

Also, five days until deadline I see. Zazie, itacv2, Toro, Santos! Start playing again!

[ConfidAnon]

It's so close to deadline, I'm happy with switching my vote to Exalt. I agree with DDD about how his votes were valid, and I now see the contradiction that ekiM pointed out. In addition, I don't like how Exalt places so much weight on people being confirmed in his wall of text. Just because someone is confirmed now does not mean that a vote on them that occurred before confirmation is not valid, nor does it mean that they are now magically right in all of their suspicions.

My suspicion is not gone from Raivann, but my vote now lies on Exalt.

Unvote, Vote: Exalt

[Sho Minamimoto]

Better would have been using some super cryptic obvious breadcrumb that only the real mason would know how to explain because it was explained in their private thread.

How could a breadcrumb be both super cryptic and obvious? I don't follow.

Hm... if I said this is a hint:
155353169927

Can anyone figure that out?

Probably not. I would give the solution to my partner, and there is the precaution necessary for a game win.

Does your given number actually work?

I'll refute Exalt's case laughable case tonight when I have more time.

I derived each number from elements on the periodic table, and eliminated the spaces to keep it obscure, but in this case, I referenced myself to insure that whoever claimed to be my partner wouldn't look like they were pulling it out of their ass too much.

15-53-53-16-9-92-7

Phosphorus - 15 - P
Iodine - 53 - I
Iodine - 53 - I
Sulfur - 16 - S
Fluorine - 09 - F
Uranium - 92 - U
Nitrogen - 07 - N

Yes. The correct answer is:
PIISFUN
or
Pi is fun.

It's so close to deadline, I'm happy with switching my vote to Exalt. I agree with DDD about how his votes were valid, and I now see the contradiction that ekiM pointed out. In addition, I don't like how Exalt places so much weight on people being confirmed in his wall of text. Just because someone is confirmed now does not mean that a vote on them that occurred before confirmation is not valid, nor does it mean that they are now magically right in all of their suspicions.

My suspicion is not gone from Raivann, but my vote now lies on Exalt.

Unvote, Vote: Exalt

Mmmm....

I'm starting to see some Exalt-Raiv connections actually, but Exalt's play has been simply terrible. He's fallen apart really:

Unvote; vote exalt

[Exalt]

GG, I'm town. Want me to hammer? People aren't too smart, since I make a case and you follow DDD once again with him not making a case. Go figure.

I'll hammer it, since town are obviously retarded. See where DDD's bandwagon gets you kids.

UNVOTE

VOTE:EXALT

[Alduskkel]

Final Vote Count:

Exalt (6) - ekiM, Debonair Danny DiPietro, Raivann, ConfidAnon, Sho Minamimoto, Exalt

ZazieR (2) - itacv2, Santos
Raivann (1) - ZazieR
Santos (1) - Toro

Just as my avatar was setting, almost everyone agreed that Exalt had to go, even Exalt.

The Town found some rope and knew what they were going to do...

However it was very old rope and broke, sending Exalt crashing to the ground.

"They just don't make rope like they used to," said ekiM.

"I'll just shoot him with this gun I conveniently have," said Alduskkel. "Any last words?"

"Yes. Just three," said Exalt.

*long pause*

"Okay then," said Alduskkel.

BANG!

Exalt,

Vanilla Townie

, was lynched Day 1.

It is now Night 1, which will last until the end of August 16th. The extra 24 hours is because Toro is V/LA until the 14th. This would be done regardless of role or alignment, i.e., Toro can't necessarily night talk. Mafia and Masons may talk now.

The "Yes. Just three." joke is from here.

[Alduskkel]

Okay, Toro can night talk. Well, could.

Toro,

Mason

, killed Night 1.

It is now Day 2. With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. The deadline is September 12th. Also, ekiM is V/LA until the 19th.

[itacv2]

I think that after me taking a stance against Zazier it was best not to eliminate me but instead kill my partner.

Vote Zazier

again
I think that following DDD without evidence was a bad move. So i guess we should seek for the second scum in that list of Exalt votes

[Sho Minamimoto]

Proof itacv? Quotes or page reference.

[ConfidAnon]

I'm most comfortable with putting my vote on Raivann to start the new day.

Vote: Raivann

[Santos]

Why, please?

I still remain skeptical of ZazieR. She grew extremely quiet towards Exalt's end.

[Toro]

*ack* *cough* */die*

[ZazieR]

Vote Raivann

[ZazieR]

Why, please?

I still remain skeptical of ZazieR. She grew extremely quiet towards Exalt's end.

See this

[Raivann]

I think that after me taking a stance against Zazier it was best not to eliminate me but instead kill my partner.

Vote Zazier

again
I think that following DDD without evidence was a bad move. So i guess we should seek for the second scum in that list of Exalt votes

ConfidAnon is scum.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

I think that after me taking a stance against Zazier it was best not to eliminate me but instead kill my partner.

Vote Zazier

again
I think that following DDD without evidence was a bad move. So i guess we should seek for the second scum in that list of Exalt votes

ConfidAnon is scum.

Got anything to back that up besides what appears to be "OMGUS"?

[Raivann]

The whole way he hoped on the Exalt wagon.