And I still do believe it. Anyway, as I said, if I survive to day 2, I will take my foot out of my mouth and start playing better.ElectricBadger wrote:Not really. I disagreed with your stance, but felt you had enough reasoning that YOU believed it.imkingdavid wrote:EB:Well, if that's how everyone is going to be expected to scum hunt, my opinion on the ethics of the method seems a bit null. I'll be voted now for asking that question (which you will note hasn't been answered in lieu of asking why I asked it), but realize that I would have been voted also for holding onto my opinion of not looking for scum buds, as current popular belief is against it.I'm understanding that you're doing something you believe is anti-town because others are pressuring you: is that interpretation correct?
Hold up...EB wrote:Tempted to kill you off just because of this. Again - YOU started off your play with broad and controversial statements on game theory; YOU are who started the debate - complaining because someone didn't blithely accept your logic is silly.imkingdavid wrote:Unintentional. I have lost interest in this particular game given the whole theory argument between myself and Adel.Judging by the overall quantity of your posting, I disagree. You are merely sidetracked; the question is whether it's intentional or not.
Ok, here's how I see my entrance to the thread:
Near the end of page four, I post my hello post, with a vote analysis, a vote for TF and an opinion that we shouldn't search for scum pairs yet. To follow that opinion up, I post my reasoning. For a good while, there's no issue.
Adel steps in and asks why I voted TF over HF, and I responded.
Then, he quickly asked me four questions that go AGAINST everything I had just stated, and made it so that if I didn't answer I looked bad because I was dodging questions, but if I did answer I was going against what I believed.
Do you get what I'm saying?Done (see my previous post)EB wrote:Agreed.imkingdavid wrote:Dramonic:Parroting and jumping on the wagon, I see? Anything else you want to say? I find your short posts that merely parrot others' opinions (which you've consistently done throughout the game) without providing your own thoughts to be a bit scummy.baaaaaacktracking on his own opinion and doing stuff he himself deems anti-town.
Well, the current pouting aside, I think I'd happily play with ya again. Also, if you are town, one huge step you could take is to use your vote to try to steer a lynch towards someone you think is mafia. It's really hard to complain people aren't voting for better suspects when you aren't, either.imkingdavid wrote:Anyway, like I said, itwas funwasn't that fun playing with all of you. I hope that my play during this game doesn't tarnish our ability to play civilly in future games together. As I realize my lynch is pretty much inevitable, this will probably be my last post in this game unless I feel like entertaining your questions a bit more. Cheers!
Like I said, I will promise to work at being a better player if I'm still in the game Day 2.EB wrote:--
ATM, I think most of the issues with IKD center on his style/personal issues - being arrogant/sarcastic/pouting. I don't like his theories or his willingness to compromise just to stay alive, but I'm not sure I can specify most of the points against him as SCUM tells. I don't think he's a bad lynch, especially in the face of his complete lack of scum hunting, but I don't think he's the best either.
Dramonic's pre-emptive excuses for mislynches, hawkishness combined with lack of posting and scumhunting, and other comments are much more pro-mafia. I think he's a much better lynch today, but managing to skate under many radars because of his short posts and lack of content.
Zwet, did you switch because you prefer IKD or just to ensure a lynch?
