What does this mean? How does the game's setup make scumhunting difficult? And what do you mean by "forensics people"?Kise wrote: I blame A.D.D. It's not as easy to go about the normal scumhunting practices since there is a lot of speculation with this game's set-up. This is more so a free-for-all between investigators and forensics people.
Hmm... I might do that... Not yet though. Every time I copy my list, I also copy my twitch along with it:Percy wrote:If *twitch* or *twitches* isthe only thingin your sig, I will edit it into the body of your post.
Interesting idea. And it would help with researching.semioldguy wrote:In looking back through the thread, I think this has some merits. I don't know about full action claims, but what do people think about daily insanity claims?Tuberkulos wrote:As I see it, what happened tonight isn't so interesting at the moment. It will be interesting on Day 2 though.
If we claim tonights actions now, cultists may have a harder time coming up with a fitting claim for tomorrow, right? If we claim tomorrow however, cultists can alter their claim to the outcome of N1.
Interestingly enough, the fact that Data would essentially be confirmed town would mean that the scum would have a reason to kill him.semioldguy wrote:@Knight of Cydonia
I don't think you should kill Datadanne tonight. If he did stalk last night and kills DeathNote tonight, it proves he is not cult. If he is, then his cult buddies will kill him since he would also be a murderer and they would know this since cultists can't murder. We can keep Datadanne alive and periodically research him to make sure his insanity is not rising to the level a murder's would (as well as putting him on grave-rob duty for a night which would slow any potential murderer down). I suppose the same could be said for you if you go through with your kill tonight as well, though we would lose one more player if you did make your kill.
Agree, just in case he actually is pro-town...semioldguy wrote:@DeathNote
Since you are going to die you should use your resuscitate kit on one of the other ten players who has a chance of dying tonight.
I unvoted.Percy wrote:DeathNote - 4 (nhammen, RestFermata, Seraphim, ZykeZero)
I think we should, as already suggested.Sajin wrote:I am wondering if we should be doing insanity count claims.
I still you might be, yes. And I also feel I have to keep my vote on someone, if only to prevent DN from being lynched at deadline. Considering the rate at which this game is going now...chenhsi wrote:semioldguy (and Cass): I explained why I thought Data was stalking me. Do you still think I am scum, or do you just have nowhere else to put your vote?
I'm confused by this... do you mean claim that you're going to research before you do it? That doesn't really make sense to me, would really help the scum (including murderers) if we did that I think.semioldguy wrote:Actually, on second thought, I think the people who researched should claim beforehand. It is more difficult to fake that way.
Choosing to ward RestFermata also gives him a convenient cover for crafting a fetish. If RestFermata turns up destroyed by an unspeakable horror, then he can just say the cult must have fetished him on night 1 and blame the newbish/scummy DeathNote for covering the noise. Magua wouldn't have that cover if he claimed to ward someone who heard no noise previously because they would still be invulnerable if he was telling the truth.Magua 553 wrote:3) Anyone with wards who didn't hear noise last night should ward someone else who didn't hear noise last night.
<expletive deleted>. I didn't even put this together until now. I messed up.Sarag wrote:This means that RestFermata was not a good target for Magua's warding, as he may already have been in danger that no further warding could prevent. One of the many people who actually heard no noise would have been far superior.
You didn't suggest me, you volunteered me. And it seemed odd that you were determined for Zwet not to do it, for reasons I still do not entirely understand. If you follow your logic to its own conclusion, you want the most *antitown* player (the one most likely to be scum) to rob the grave.On top of that, he was strangely reluctant to rob the grave when I suggested he do so. I didn't think much of it at the time because he'd been making helpful and pro-town seeming posts. But really, an Investigator should have no qualms about robbing the grave. Investigators do not have carefully laid plans that might get disrupted, only Cultists and Murderers do. Any rational, team-playing Investigator (and Magua has gone to pains to seem like both) would easily recognise that the grave must be robbed, and that the insanity gained by doing so cannot practically be avoided (by an individual yes, but not by the team).
Correct. I meant for people to claim if and who they researched before mass claiming insanity levels.dramonic wrote:actually, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, he's saying we should mass-claim if we researched and results now, after which a mass insanity claim would be nice.
*twitch*Sarag wrote:Kise - did you hear noise last night?
Hmm, yes that's true. Well, RF would not have been the best target for that plan, but your point stands. Damn, oh well.Magua wrote:But your logic about me being cult crafting. Were I cult crafting a fetish, I would've just claimed to use a resuscitation kit on RestFermata if I were going for a cover. All the benefits, none of the drawbacks.
It isn't obvious to me why this is a better plan than claiming insanities first. Could you explain it please?semioldguy wrote:Correct. I meant for people to claim if and who they researched before mass claiming insanity levels.