#1: A treatise on arguing in the game of mafia:

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
yabbaguy
yabbaguy
(O)ptimized
User avatar
User avatar
yabbaguy
(O)ptimized
(O)ptimized
Posts: 3175
Joined: April 26, 2009
Location: Massachusetts

Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:17 am

Post by yabbaguy »

There's someone who agrees with me on the "level-headedness is pro-town" point.

One paragraph that might be worth adding to that is a further list of mistakes people make when arguing. Common things:

-people who turn on Mode 2 (convincing) and go after people too soon, and wind up tunnelvisioning.
-people who remain in Mode 1 (discovering) for an unnaturally long time, thus questioning their scumhunting.
-people who switch modes with great volatility or inconsistency.
-people who have turned on Mode 2 on too many/not enough people at a certain point in the game.

A further point about objective debates, especially theory debates, it's hard to win those most of the time. Often it ends in the stalemate of "you have your opinions and I have mine." Expecting scum will
crack
because of that is just downright ridiculous.

Well written, by the way. I love the debate aspect of Mafia more than anything else.
yabbaguy ~ Winning without actually winning.

Town: 10-21 | Mafia: 3-4 | Other: 0-1
yGDB
(meta + commentary)

- On reruns at Sens-O-Tape!

Return to “Mafia Discussion”