Dranko20 wrote:vote: bamboomancer
consider it started
Nothing out of the norm .. standard Day 1 voting, although it's not random.
Dranko20 wrote:Unvote Panda
Even though he said never to trust me
You can trust me, i'm nice, and white.
Anyways, I'm gonna
Vote: mneme
.
Not really a good reason, but he said that there was potentionally experienced members in the mafia right? Well, that includes you, don't it?
It's not much, but worth a vote to me.
For some reason Dranko unvoted a person that he never originally was voting, unless Panda is another name for Bamboo? Votes for Mneme because of a statement Mneme made about experienced players being in the mafia, (big deal)
Dranko20 wrote:I'm willing to lynch anyone who lives in Iowa or Ohio. New hampshire qualifies too, dont get to shady now you hear.
Normal outspoken Dranko, and a bit on the less intelligent side as well.
Dranko20 wrote:I'm suspicious of Coolbot for being so eagar to jump back on to me and STD for following him so fast, but my vote on mneme still stands.
6 days later, He states suspiciouns on other players who happen to be bandwagoning him, but still thinks that his vote on Mneme is a better vote .. (To each his own I guess)
I don't really find anything that out of the ordinary from Dranko's post, nothing is related to the game really which is normal, but besides that what constitutes as scummy.
Someone said earlier that we shouldn't be expected to be able to always be voting for sure on Day 1, but shouldn't we at least have some logical explanation behind our votes. It's not all random, sure it starts out that way, but if it really was only a random wagon it would never be able to progress without that person's actions being taken a closer look at, or the person never shows up to defend one's self.