Newbie 839 - Game over

Del · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:38 am

EBWOP

I'm going to

Fos: Maemuki

.

Reason: for hounding me over a trivial RVS post I made early in the game. I'm also interested in the posts she's made about it.

Maemuki wrote:
Del wrote:
Fos: DDD

For somehow not throwing out random accusations and votes during RVS.

unvote

Because Raskol's posts made me laugh
Are you trying to extend the RVS? And did you notice that we have, well, a person at L-1?

The first question she clarified to:

Maemuki wrote:You did not understand my question. Did you? I asked if you were trying to extend the RVS, by [on my view] randomly voting Raskol. Did you have a serious reason?

So, if I understand correctly (which I hope I do not, because mild confusion will arise as a result), you asked me if I was trying to extend the RVS by randomly voting for Raskol, based on a post in which I quite clearly removed my vote on Raskol.

Assuming you missed that post and were referring to the actual post in which I voted for Raskol, made during the RVS (I base this on bub and diakron voting for trivial reasons in posts made after mine, which I take to mean the RVS was still occuring when my trivial vote was made). So, how does that translate as an attempt to prolong the RVS, when others continued it instead?

Diakron 4 skitzo, Ibrahimagic, Tehstefan, Bub Bidderskins
Ibrahimagic 1 Diakron
skitzo
Tehstefan
Bub Bidderskins 1 Raskol
Del
Raskol
Maemuki
Debonair Danny DiPietro 1 Maemuki,

Not Voting

Debonair Danny DiPietro

Del

Del · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:43 am

EBWOP

I'm sorry for triple post, but after reading my post above, the part inside of me which constitutes english grammar died a little inside.

Assuming you missed that post and were referring to the actual post in which I voted for Raskol on Page 1, made clearly during the RVS*, then how do you translate that as an attempt to prolong the RVS?

*(I base this on bub and diakron voting for trivial reasons in posts made after mine, which I take to mean the RVS was still occuring when my trivial vote was made)

Maemuki · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:52 am

Aw, darn, I guess that playing games is bad for my health. And braincells.

I thought you were voting for him, not unvoting.

My apologies. D:

starkmoon · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:07 am

Diakron 4 skitzo, Ibrahimagic, Tehstefan, Bub Bidderskins
Ibrahimagic 1 Diakron
skitzo
Tehstefan
Bub Bidderskins 1 Raskol
Del
Raskol
Maemuki
Debonair Danny DiPietro 1 Maemuki,

Not Voting

Debonair Danny DiPietro

Del

Bub Bidderskins · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:27 am

Okay, let's rehash, who are our top suspects? I know there was a great deal brought up against Diakron, and he hasn't posted since. Also, there were some acusations up in the air against one of the lurkers. Also, Del just brought up something against Maemuki.

Raskol · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:48 pm

Ibrahimagic, Skitzo, and Maemuki all still have their random votes on.

So, a question for those three:

Since you haven't changed your votes, can I assume that the person you're voting for is currently your top suspect? If the person you're voting for is your top suspect, why are they? If they aren't, why are you still voting for them?
______________________________________________________________________________

Bub, answer my question from post 108. What did you want to see if Diakron was lying about?

Raskol · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:54 pm

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote: We could just shamelessly bandwagon them until they say something instead, how does that sound?

Better than nothing. Why don't you start us off?

Debonair Danny DiPietro · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:11 pm

Raskol wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote: We could just shamelessly bandwagon them until they say something instead, how does that sound?
Better than nothing. Why don't you start us off?

Sure thing.

Vote: Tehstefan

Maemuki · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:09 am

Raskol wrote:Since you haven't changed your votes, can I assume that the person you're voting for is currently your top suspect? If the person you're voting for is your top suspect, why are they? If they aren't, why are you still voting for them?

Wait, I still have my random vote? Silly me.

Unvote

Bub Bidderskins · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:52 am

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Raskol wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote: We could just shamelessly bandwagon them until they say something instead, how does that sound?
Better than nothing. Why don't you start us off?
Sure thing.

Vote: Tehstefan

What is your reason for voting for him?

Debonair Danny DiPietro · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:12 am

Bub Bidderskins wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Raskol wrote:
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote: We could just shamelessly bandwagon them until they say something instead, how does that sound?
Better than nothing. Why don't you start us off?
Sure thing.

Vote: Tehstefan
What is your reason for voting for him?

Did you not read the quotes right above the vote?

Ibrahimagic · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:16 pm

I'm keeping my vote, despite it being completely random at first. A lot has been brought up about Diakron, and even if he does turn out to be town, he'll be no great loss.

Bub Bidderskins · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:31 pm

Ibrahimagic wrote:I'm keeping my vote, despite it being completely random at first. A lot has been brought up about Diakron, and even if he does turn out to be town, he'll be no great loss.

Why are you keep your vote? You say it's random and you don't even unvote. If it really is random (as in, a random townie), then why do you keep it?

Oh, and DDD, now I see. However, it isn't really too random seeing as he really is undercontributing and wouldn't be a real loss even if he was town.

Raskol · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:36 pm

unvote

vote: Tehstefan

This only works if we have several people doing it.

Someone else get on this wagon. We have cake.

Debonair Danny DiPietro · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:52 pm

Raskol wrote:Someone else get on this wagon. We have cake.

Lots and lots of cake.

skitzo · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:14 pm

Ibrahimagic wrote:I'm keeping my vote, despite it being completely random at first. A lot has been brought up about Diakron, and even if he does turn out to be town, he'll be no great loss.

i totally agree about that with you

Maemuki · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:48 am

....Isn't Tehstefan prod elligible?
Anyways.

Skitzo, please stop posting one-liners. Or two-liners. Just. Post. Something. Kthx.

Vote: Tehstefan

, post now.

Bub Bidderskins · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:45 am

skitzo wrote:
Ibrahimagic wrote:I'm keeping my vote, despite it being completely random at first. A lot has been brought up about Diakron, and even if he does turn out to be town, he'll be no great loss.
i totally agree about that with you

For that matter Skitzo, you seem quite scummy yourself. Which part of Ibramagic's post do you agree with? The random part or the Diakron part? And why are you undercontributing? You leave a lot of questions unanswered. I'm going to

FOS: Skitzo

.

skitzo · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:36 pm

Diakron wrote:I have nothing else to say as this game is so slow that i have gotten bored with it. i will try playing one more time on this forum and if its the same i will find another place to play.

skitzo wrote:what would you prefer?
alot of one-liners?

Maemuki wrote:Skitzo, please stop posting one-liners. Or two-liners. Just. Post. Something. Kthx.

isnt that what diakron wants maemuki?
if we dont really go into very much detail then it will be faster?
right now my top suspect would definitely be diakron seeing as he wanted all the power roles to claim

Bub Bidderskins · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:19 pm

skitzo wrote:
Diakron wrote:I have nothing else to say as this game is so slow that i have gotten bored with it. i will try playing one more time on this forum and if its the same i will find another place to play.
skitzo wrote:what would you prefer?
alot of one-liners?
Maemuki wrote:Skitzo, please stop posting one-liners. Or two-liners. Just. Post. Something. Kthx.
isnt that what diakron wants maemuki?
if we dont really go into very much detail then it will be faster?
right now my top suspect would definitely be diakron seeing as he wanted all the power roles to claim

As a matter of fact, it wasn't Diakron that asked the power roles to claim. It was Raskol.

skitzo · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:59 pm

whoops i must have mixed them up

unvote
vote rascol

Tehstefan · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:45 pm

Hmm. My apologies for not posting more often, Calculus is a cruel mistress. However, I don't think I would be an undercontributer. In any case, I dunno if Raskol is in the clear yet for me. He is doing a great job of drawing attention to himself, something rather unscummy, but it could just all be a ploy, act brazen and have people think your not. And eek! I'm being bandwagoned!

Tehstefan · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:46 pm

EBWOP: As well, I'm sticking with diakron, he definitely seems scummy to me, and his demeaner states it.

starkmoon · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:25 pm

Prods sent to those who need them.

Mod is sick, and spending the day/weekend/rest of the year/decade/century (delete as appropriate) in bed. Will try to be alive enough to do a vote count later, any I did now would end up being incorrect.

Bub Bidderskins · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:33 am

Tehstefan wrote:EBWOP: As well, I'm sticking with diakron, he definitely seems scummy to me, and his demeaner states it.

You mean lack of demeaner. I think he abandoned this game when he saw he was being bandwagoned.