Mini 852- Crayola Catastrophe Game Over (Post 1158)

[Kirbyoshi]

Thanks Manzcar and SocioPath for telling me I was right

Obvbuddying

Obvscumclaim

[Kirbyoshi]

Great, now I feel horrible for misrepresenting Pom's color. -_-

[SocioPath]

Thanks Manzcar and SocioPath for telling me I was right

Obvbuddying

Obvscumclaim

Obv Over Obving

[chamber]

First, that was the second vote not the forth. Second that was for an arbitrary reason, my vote for you was note.

First, arguing which number it was doesn't address what the vote does or appears to be doing. Second, if you don't share your reason, then I have no reason to believe your vote on me wasn't arbitrary. And it's still OMGUS.

From the wiki:

OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.

Since my vote wasn't because you voted me at all it is in fact NOT an omgus vote.

Also I don't explain my votes, get over it.

[SocioPath]

Also I don't explain my votes, get over it.

That I hope will change to at least some extent.

[semioldguy]

From the wiki:

OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.

Since my vote wasn't because you voted me at all it is in fact NOT an omgus vote.

Also I don't explain my votes, get over it.

If you don't explain your vote, then you can't explain that it wasn't an OMGUS vote.

[semioldguy]

Unvote; Vote: chamber

[Kirbyoshi]

First, that was the second vote not the forth. Second that was for an arbitrary reason, my vote for you was note.

First, arguing which number it was doesn't address what the vote does or appears to be doing. Second, if you don't share your reason, then I have no reason to believe your vote on me wasn't arbitrary. And it's still OMGUS.

From the wiki:

OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.

Since my vote wasn't because you voted me at all it is in fact NOT an omgus vote.

Also I don't explain my votes, get over it.

This is a pretty juicy scum post. First, you give a dictionary definition for something that I think at least has come to mean more than that. Basically, from my limited experience, it doesn't have to be a vote; it could be anything the OMGUS-ee does/says that the OMGUS-er doesn't like--not thinks is scummy, just doesn't like.

Then you go on to say you don't explain your votes. This is anti-town at the very least, and most of the time a pretty strong scumtell imo (of course, that's without any sort of metagaming involved).

And finally, you make a statement that reads as follows: "get over it." This is very abrasive, and a scummy GTFO move. I'll have to check the votes before I see how much pressure you were under, or if I want to vote you, but it's probably coming.

[Kirbyoshi]

Ok, when you made that statement, you only had one vote on you, which makes you even more scummy for making that comment, and now you only have two (please correct me if I'm wrong), so I have no qualms in doing this...

Unvote Pom, Vote: chamber

[Kirbyoshi]

@mod: Oops, please fix that.

[semioldguy]

I'd put another two or three on there myself if I could. I agree with most of your points, you make yourself a little more detailed than I make myself, but it's prettymuch spot on with my thoughts. Except I don't agree with abrasiveness as being a scumtell. Though personally I'm not worried about getting over it, as he can just be lynched and then I don't have to get over it.

[Budja]

unvote, vote Chamber

I agree that chamber is looking very scummy. The vote of semioldguy, the "I don't explain votes" are bad along with the initial bandwagon paranoia stick out the most to me.

[chamber]

I took a couple year break so maybe I missed the evolution of it, but I've only ever known it by my quoted definition.
I don't think being abrasive is scummy, and I don't think explaining votes is pro town.
Why should the number of votes I have change my response?

[semioldguy]

The only part in your most recent point I have disagreement with is that I think explaining votes can be pro-town, I don't think it is always pro-town, but that usually it is. Being abrasive isn't scummy though, as I already stated, and the number of votes shouldn't change a response, but an explanation to your responses could change your response based upon what you read and how you interpret it.

[Kirbyoshi]

Ok, so being abrasive isn't always scummy, I forgot about some players I've played with who were pretty fishing abrasive who turned out to be town. Still don't like it, as it can be anti-town if used the wrong way, but not always scummy.

And the number of votes would change my analysis of your post, as that kind of comment would have been less scummy of you were under more pressure from votes.

And how would not explaining votes be pro-town?

[SocioPath]

I'm liking Kirbyoshi.
Semioldguy, not so much.
Although both are on the chamber wagon, which I'm not against at this point.

[chamber]

And how would not explaining votes be pro-town?

I'm asked this too often, I should write it out and put it in an md thread sometime. In the meantime all thats important as far as my alighnment goes is that I believe it, and that fact is fairly well documented, including my sig.

[Kirbyoshi]

And how would not explaining votes be pro-town?

I'm asked this too often, I should write it out and put it in an md thread sometime. In the meantime all thats important as far as my alighnment goes is that I believe it, and that fact is fairly well documented, including my sig.

How does your sig document the fact that you don't believe in explaining your votes?

[SocioPath]

And how would not explaining votes be pro-town?

I'm asked this too often, I should write it out and put it in an md thread sometime. In the meantime all thats important as far as my alighnment goes is that I believe it, and that fact is fairly well documented, including my sig.

How does your sig document the fact that you don't believe in explaining your votes?

Maybe he meant MY sig.
As mine is far more relevant than a few lines of nonsense. ;D

[Kirbyoshi]

Socio, I should know what your sig means, but I don't. Mind translating from what I assume is Latin?

[SocioPath]

Socio, I should know what your sig means, but I don't. Mind translating from what I assume is Latin?

Only when the words outperform silence.

[chamber]

Meant title. what I get for not double checking posts.

sig = signature

[semioldguy]

I'm liking Kirbyoshi.
Semioldguy, not so much.
Although both are on the chamber wagon, which I'm not against at this point.

Considering you still have your vote on me from what I thought was a random vote, what exactly don't you like?

[Kirbyoshi]

Meant title. what I get for not double checking posts.

sig = signature

Still doesn't explain why you don't explain your votes, just that you don't.

[chamber]

Meant title. what I get for not double checking posts.

sig = signature

Still doesn't explain why you don't explain your votes, just that you don't.

That is correct. If I do so regardless of alignment though it should be an irrelevent point. I just don't feel like explaining myself right now, maybe another day.