AlmasterGM - 3 (ElectricBadger, WeyounsLastClone, dramonic)
ortolan
Hoopla
Synx
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch!
Deadline is October 1st, midnight.
It's not a bad move if multiple players have the same number but not the same role. Seeing as I have the same number as someone who is dead, it's entirely possible that there is another miner in the game, but their role is different than Synx's.ElectricBadger wrote:That doesn't change my premise, though. Claiming a fake role seems like a bad move. If there were another miner, for instance, they would be able to tell quickly whether the role matched their own
That's not what I said, so no. Even so, though, like someone else said, there's no reason roles aren't arbitrarily handed out. Numbers clearly were. Why not roles? Saying "no reason to believe otherwise" is a fallacious assumption.dramonic wrote:Almaster says he has one of the roles that are dead. Most likely the flag was removed (since in the real game it's instant-win). Unless Charter duplicated roles in a completely arbitrary manner, the only role I can see well being duplicated is the spy. Two trackers on the town team would be pretty unlikely, wouldn't you say?
I'm not claiming any role - I'm just saying I share a number. The point of me doing this is that some people seem to be operating under certain presumptions regarding the setup that aren't true (e.g., the Miner has this role, if this person claims this number there can be a counterclaim, etc) I fail to see how this prevents the town from counterclaiming. We can still do that. If anything, it checks back false counterclaims because we know that more than one person can have the same number.EB wrote:Spy had no numerical rank, so no. Others were both vanilla, although Almaster's phrasing seems to imply he's not (or at least leaves the possibility open). I'm inclined to think this is misinformation to prevent town from counterclaiming as long as he's alive, as I can't see his eagerness to identify his rank serving any other purpose at the moment.
Because I might want to lynch someone else like Vaya or even Hoops.EB (373) wrote:Then why no vote?
Early game was lots of cross-questioning from him and setup speculation without taking much of a stand on anything. He only votes when prompted. Some of the dead (confirmed) townies also suspected him. It's quite possible he's not scum with Synx though.EB (373) wrote:Not thrilled with everything he's done, but he reads town to me so far. What stands out?
That doesn't make any sense to me at all. For one, the second bandwagon lynched scum, and you have two other players both in similar positions to me. Show your reasoning please.Gorrad wrote:Alive D1 people on final BW:Hoopla, Vaya, AlmasterGM, ortolan
Alive D2 people on final BW: Gorrad,Vaya, AlmasterGM, Hoopla, ElectricBadger
Vote: Hoopla.
I'm confused, Hoops. You've called out dramonic for posting suspicion and not voting; you've called out the first dramonic wagon for putting him at L-1 and not lynching; and you've called me out for hammering a third time L-1.Hoopla wrote:I'm looking squarely at those that weren't on the Synx lynch, and possibly EB for being the hammer vote.
All the other votes in the game that you've failed to mention? Voting is a great way to discover motives, as they are generally a statement of intent.ElectricBadger wrote:I'm confused, Hoops. You've called out dramonic for posting suspicion and not voting; you've called out the first dramonic wagon for putting him at L-1 and not lynching; and you've called me out for hammering a third time L-1.Hoopla wrote:I'm looking squarely at those that weren't on the Synx lynch, and possibly EB for being the hammer vote.
What vote, precisely, ISN'T a scum tell for you?
Then if I recall correctly the first time she mentioned Synx was here:Hoopla (99) wrote:Although I catch myself using tentative language as town, I still disagree. ScumWeyounsLastClone wrote:I always feel scum can often post with much more certainty than townies and that townies in general tend to use more 'tentative'. Finding peole scummy because they use 'I think' is scummy of its own in my opinion.knowthat whoever they're attacking is town, andknowthey're lying. Using tentative language allows for suspicion on a player but also a get-out clause if need be. Most scum players will generally try and leave options open for bussing, or chasing other townies.
Leaving FoS's is another tactic that furthers suspicion without furthering a wagon, but still leaves a placeholder of suspicion to jump back to if needing an excuse to jump on a wagon.
Hoopla (244) wrote:I still like my Sajin vote. Can someone explain the Synx wagon for me?
Only when Synx came under suspicion did she really start to claim to suspect him. Then she confidently put him on L-1 being "confident" he would flip scum, after using the excuse of being away and thus unable to attend to the game. Seems like rather standard busing to me.Hoopla (265) wrote:I'd still rather a Sajin lynch, but I'm not opposed to the Synx wagon on the basis of him being lurky.
I'm not sure if I'd rather lynch Vaya or Hoops first.Vaya (327) wrote:I actually kinda agree with dramonic. A role that only blocks scum kills seems odd to me. To clarify, Synx, does your role pm specifically say you only block scum kills, or does it simply prevent kills in general?
Again, I don't understand why ortolan is so confident about a SK. You're not usually one to exaggerate so heavily, so I find it odd why you hold these views. Why don't town aligned kills make sense to you?ortolan wrote:fyi the last? scum doesn't need to have connections to the two mafia players. I'm 99% sure the setup is either 3 mafia and one SK or 2 mafia and one SK (leaning towards the latter).
Vaya/Hoops are the two players I'm looking at to fill out those roles.
This is a matter of scum conciousness. As scum know the cases they pursue and votes they make are false, they're aware of their collective suspicions. Many don't even look at this beyond the cosmetic, and I speculate only the brazen would buddy so openly on the same bandwagon. Talented scum can manipulate this, but I don't think WLC fits into this category, and I could not possibly see him jumping on to dramonic's fizzling wagon if Synx AND Gorrad were scum.WeyounsLastClone wrote:I'm not really sure, at this point I'd still like to vote for ortolan or Gorrad, but those votes wouldn't help that much. I don't see the point for either Sajin or Synx, but dramonic I can see a bit of reason why he'd be scum.Unvote. Vote: dramonic.
Cases aren't really my thing. I offer quantified gut feelings and processes of elimination. PBPA's and iso-cases are always reaching, and almost always bullshit. But here is my thinking now;ortolan wrote:I would like you to make a case against someone Hoops
And then jumped off, and didn't manage to find a way back on to his wagon, while still offering suspicion. I also have a gut feeling about your play in general - it just feels superficial and overly assumptive, which doesn't remind me of town you.ortolan wrote:Vote: Synx
Certainly until he provides a better explanation for that misspelling.