Mini 859 - Cleansing of Falls Church - Over

[Peabody]

/confirm

[Peabody]

/confirm

This is like a reunion from my newbie game!

My my.. If you are really mafia this time, no one will believe my accusations!!

Good luck, bro.

I'm ready to rock.

[Peabody]

vote Far_Cry

rawr.

[Peabody]

Vote: Peabody

I feel obligated to continue the tradition.

Rofl.

And there's the chainsaw defense.

Pretty pleased with myself for finding all three scum in just two pages.

Sanjay, are you being serious?

[Peabody]

Unvote :
Vote: Sanjay

How do you know there are three scum?

I was thinking the same exact thing but I didn't want to bring it up, hoping maybe he'd slip again.

[Peabody]

BigBear's self-vote bugs me.

Far_cry is making me nervous.

[Peabody]

Far_Cry's play has been quite strange to me. During the RVS, I have been sitting back and just noting little behavior, and I didn't like things that I saw from Far_Cry thus far.

Far_Cry's post 59 and post 60 makes me a bit uneasy. I think it is a bit strange to failvote and then revote during the RVS. It's a vote that doesn't matter anyway..

His vote on BigBear really does seem as Shrinehme says. It looks as if BB were baiting someone and FC took the bait. BB is being an easy target right now, but that does not mean he is above questioning.

Gambit, BigBear?

[Peabody]

So you don't feel as if this is a bus for future reference? (Distancing?)

Are you referring to Shrinehme and BigBear or Far_Cry and BigBear?

[Peabody]

Who specifically did you mean in post 110, Looker?

[Peabody]

@Far_Cry

I'm not sympathetifc to your cause. Why the early no lynch? Want an easy night of killing? unvote vote BigBear

When I was rereading the thread, I was thinking to myself, "This vote on BigBear has to be a joke". As I read on... I realized it was very serious:

Actually, my reasons for voting BigBear were more legitimate than yours for voting me. Yep, you're so sure on page 4 that I'm scum bandwagoning people.

You're voting BigBear because he voted no lynch?

BigBear might me doing this on purpose. It's a possible idea that he is scum that does some things that are SO terrible that people think he's not scum. A possible reverse psychology strategy.

All of a sudden you acknowledge you could be wrong... but you could be right... Why is your vote even on BigBear?

Me bussing BigBear? How could anyone

know

that BigBear and I are scum by page 5? Psychic?

Weird word usage...

@EthrealCookie

Vote: EtherealCookie
Don't leave me out of the fun!

Why the self vote? Are you playing off of Far_Cry's WIFOM comment bc you thought it was a good idea?

He switches his vote a lot in the same posts and he's mean to other people(!!!!). I don't know why he'd vote for No Lynch either.

You basically copied his voting pattern... You voted for yourself, just like BigBear, and now you are questioning BB's erratic behavior (Even after you self-voted?)

I think someone already pointed this out, but these two quotes seem contradictory:

True. I think I'll just stay on the bandwagon for a bit, though.

What is a L-2 going to do right now anyhow? If someone actually does lynch him, that automatically tells us who is scum.

I can't tell what you are trying to do with your Shrinehme vote EC... You said that it won't do anything. But you refuse to take the vote off of him. Then after you are questioned, you decided to act all hardcore about the vote. Seems like you are trying to

feel

your vote..

You tell me; you're the one to initiated it. <.<

Do you expect me to freak out or claim role or something?

No, no, you tell

me.

Way to dodge a question..

Early reads detect possible scum pair: Far_Cry/EthrealCookie

[Peabody]

I don't quite know what I'm doing. You tell me!

That doesn't answer my questions/evidences. Responding would be beneficial.

[Peabody]

I self-voted because I was left out of the fun.

You basically copied his voting pattern... You voted for yourself, just like BigBear, and now you are questioning BB's erratic behavior (Even after you self-voted?)

I'm a hypocrit.

I can't tell what you are trying to do with your Shrinehme vote EC... You said that it won't do anything. But you refuse to take the vote off of him. Then after you are questioned, you decided to act all hardcore about the vote. Seems like you are trying to feel your vote..

I don't know, you tell me!

Wanna try again? Do you have reasoning behind anything you do?

[Peabody]

What do you think about Peabody's play so far?

Hm. He points out weird word usage, which I don't think is a scum tell at all, unless it's very obvious, such as knowing the roles due to set ups. He asks a lot of questions.

They're not exactly pointing out anything scummy at the moment,

however, and are pretty simple questions. I get neutral vibes. We'll see if he steps up his questioning and actually points out anything noteworthy, won't we?

Really? I'm not pointing out anything scummy? I would say that my questions are being used to hunt scum.

All of a sudden you acknowledge you could be wrong... but you could be right... Why is your vote even on BigBear?

So you're telling me that we need 100% proof that a person is scum before lynching them? Well damn, we won't get anywhere with that.

What I'm saying is normally people are pretty sure they want someone lynched, and they don't normally bring WIFOM into the picture. It looks a lot like fencesitting

which is a scumtell

.

I think someone already pointed this out, but these two quotes seem contradictory:

If someone pointed it out, why are you pointing it out again? People do read the posts, y'know.

Yes, but it's always good to look at it from another angle.

Early reads detect possible scum pair: Far_Cry/EthrealCookie

I'd love to know your reasoning for that. Being a useless townie must mean you're scum, right?

My reasoning was in the post you are quoting.

Oh and...

Did you just claim???

[Peabody]

Grrrr. FC is being replaced???

Way to dodge my questions

Hey, Looker, can you expound more why you like EC's play. What specifically do you like about it? I found your post as strange and ill-placed.

[Peabody]

I'm fine with lynching EC.

[Peabody]

I notice EC hasn't posted much about anyone in this game. He dodges questions with ambiguous statements. I'm not entirely happy with his play up to that point. I'm expecting your weekend post to be good, EC.

[Peabody]

Honestly, I was pretty serious from the very beginning. Post 43 was my first serious post.

Zaz, what is your take on the game so far? I think everyone is waiting for this question to be answered.

[Peabody]

will post soon..

Wow, Zaz... maybe you could shorten into 1 post?

[Peabody]

will post tomorrow

FO SHO

[Peabody]

Post 73 –

Peabody

, what did you think of Sanjay’s explanation?

Sorry, I must have missed Sanjay's question. Sanjay, my "are you serious" post was referring to your claiming that you caught all three scum. I was having trouble understanding whether you were joking or whether you legitimately believed that one or more of the people you listed were scum.

Post 111 – Why didn’t you join the discussion,

Peabody

? Also, can you elaborate on the random vote bit?

What do you mean by joining in the discussion? I felt that most of the RVS was just gibberish. I just decided to observe, and I found Far_Cry to be scummy. My vote on him was not random.

Disagreed on the following (Though EC seems to agree with one):

I think someone already pointed this out, but these two quotes seem contradictory:

True. I think I'll just stay on the bandwagon for a bit, though.

What is a L-2 going to do right now anyhow? If someone actually does lynch him, that automatically tells us who is scum.

I can't tell what you are trying to do with your Shrinehme vote EC... You said that it won't do anything. But you refuse to take the vote off of him. Then after you are questioned, you decided to act all hardcore about the vote. Seems like you are trying to

feel

your vote..

Also, can you elaborate how the last two quotes from EC seem contradictory?

They seem contradictory because EthrealCookie seemed to acknowledge the power of his vote, and then said that his vote did nothing.

After reading, I am really starting to suspect Brothernature. BN, what do you think of Zazie?


Gahh, reading this thread is getting tougher for me bc all of the multiposts. Zazie, can you please tone down a bit so that I can read a little more. Maybe fit it into one post?

[Peabody]

I'm going to

unvote ZazieR; vote brothernature

I'm pretty sure he's scum.

I've also got an

FOS DeathRowKitty

for his unvoting of CA. You seemed really adamant about voting Confid. Now to change your vote to a lurker is alarming.

Also, I'd like to

FoS ConfidAnon

because the inconsistencies which DRK pointed out are scary.