Mini 859 - Cleansing of Falls Church - Over

[Looker]

What are you talking about, Shrinescumgodfatherhme?

Only the scum would know their godfather. You're scum?
Vote stays.

you're retarded. Only scum would know

if

there was a godfather.

Unvote:
Vote: No Lynch

Giving up already?

Far_Cry's Post 86 - Wait, Nook's gay? Cuz I've got lasers shootin' outta my ass, too but I still likes boobies...

And I concur with your vote on BigBear, I'd prefer it if we at least

tried

to find scum today. Who had the most votes when BigBear decided to go no lynch?

[Shrinehme]

Me.

[Looker]

Okay, just throwing it out there, shoot it down if you want.

You get the most votes, the closest to a lynch, and then BigBear votes no lynch.
Far_Cry votes BigBear for wanting a no lynch.
You vote Far_Cry.

Shoot it down.

[ConfidAnon]

Okay, just throwing it out there, shoot it down if you want.

You get the most votes, the closest to a lynch, and then BigBear votes no lynch.
Far_Cry votes BigBear for wanting a no lynch.
You vote Far_Cry.

Shoot it down.

To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.

One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.

[BigBear]

Unvote:
Vote: Shrinehme

[Far_Cry]

Whoa, whoa. What's with all the votes on me all of a sudden?

Far_Cry, was it really necessary to call nook an idiot? Can't we save the personal attacks for post-game?

Also, why are you so eager to get out of the random voting stage?

I'm srry, but sometimes, I go too far and insult people. Its just the way I am.

I'm not liking FC right now.

And, can people like Sanjay. nook, and bear (among others) stop saying stupid things and actually try to do something?

This came in his 6th post, immediately following (51 seconds after) his first serious post, while we were still essentially in the RVS (arguably we're still in the RVS).

Now, just what was his first serious post about? It was basically a post about other people not being serious enough and/or saying stupid things. If he's really so adamant about people getting things done instead of messing around, there were things to comment about (BB's odd voting, my potential SK tell).

Then came FC's most recent post that concluded with the following:

I'm not sympathetifc to your cause. Why the early no lynch? Want an easy night of killing? unvote vote BigBear

This really looks to me like making a big deal out of nothing, even for the RVS. I could be wrong, but I'm fairly certain BB is either trying to be lynchbait to get us out of the RVS or is just playing around (hopefully I didn't just give him an excuse...). BB's actions thus far would be terrible scum play and I have a hard time believing that it is scum play. Considering that FC hadn't commented on BB's play (besides saying BB needed to stop saying stupid things), a vote out of the blue based on a no lynch vote seems like FC reaching to get a bandwagon started on BB, especially when there was legitimate evidence to bring up against BB.

Unvote, vote: Far_Cry

Actually, my reasons for voting BigBear were more legitimate than yours for voting me. Yep, you're so sure on page 4 that I'm scum bandwagoning people.

Oh, by the way, you are a total idiot nook. And I never new you were gay.

Are you trying to distance from nook by insulting him?! O:

Because that would be very sneaky: making each other look as though on opposite ends without

really

attacking each other.

Unless you're just insulting him because you think it's to be taken as a joke, or something?

Unvote!

Vote: Far_Cry

And you don't say anything about this, Death? That you have started a bandwagon on me, and turn around and say that bandwagons are bad? Completely contradictory.

I'm laughing so hard my sides hurt. No, just kidding.

Oh, by the way, you are a total idiot nook. And I never new you were gay.

I'll take that as a compliment. I'm so gay that i put a picture of megan's fox ass as my avatar . either that you might be trying to be sarcastic with me, but then again you dont need to be this crude i being sarcastic. If you were sarcastic of course

Shun the non-believer....Shuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun.....At the moment,

Unvote

. Don't want any wagons this early, and with three votes, might just be heading that way.

Don't want any wagons this early? I mean granted that the "wagon" on Shrinehme was completely random, but still wagons at this early stage can help lead us somewhere in this game, and drop cues for us to use in the later days. Voting patterns, distancing or buddying up, all that.

In fact, I want a wagon right now. Helps to get us out of the RVS. Of course, talk is cheap.

unvote, vote: Far_Cry

You seemed so rushed to get out of the RVS and get to some lynching, but you contribute nothing but insults and one or two lines of replies to quotes.

Granted, this is more of a vote for pissing me off than a vote for scummy behaviour, but elements of scummy behaviour do feature in it. Right now I'm not getting any clear scum vibes from the rest, BigBear is behaving too randomly to get a lock on him, and as for DRK's supposed SKtell it is not strong and I guess we'll find out if there is a SK eventually.

Since there is nowhere better to place my vote at the moment, you'll get it. This will be interesting.

And do you have anything to say about this Death?

[Far_Cry]

Okay, just throwing it out there, shoot it down if you want.

You get the most votes, the closest to a lynch, and then BigBear votes no lynch.
Far_Cry votes BigBear for wanting a no lynch.
You vote Far_Cry.

Shoot it down.

To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.

One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.

BigBear might me doing this on purpose. It's a possible idea that he is scum that does some things that are SO terrible that people think he's not scum. A possible reverse psychology strategy.

[Shrinehme]

To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.

One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.

It didn't occur to you that he intentionally voted himself and No Lynch in order to coax Scum into thinking he was an easy target gun for [And Far_Cry took the bait, notably]? T'was the first thing to pop into my head... but maybe I have a slight advantage from being more familiar with his play, and I shouldn't assume everyone should recognize the same?

I don't have much to say about Looker's points, other than that BigBear voting No Lynch doubtfully had anything to do with my three random votes [yes they were "the most", but still....

three

, no where near the majority vote needed]. Aside from that, the progression of events were just... convenient/coincidental/ect.

[Looker]

Unvote:
Vote: Shrinehme

Nice. I want to vote you, but moreso probably because I don't trust your intelligence than I believe you to be scum. Which brings up a good question: Should town always necessarily bring up their thought processes in-thread to everyone? Should we all know just how smart you are if you're town?

Okay, just throwing it out there, shoot it down if you want.

You get the most votes, the closest to a lynch, and then BigBear votes no lynch.
Far_Cry votes BigBear for wanting a no lynch.
You vote Far_Cry.

Shoot it down.

To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.

One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.

BigBear might me doing this on purpose. It's a possible idea that he is scum that does some things that are SO terrible that people think he's not scum. A possible reverse psychology strategy.

Reverse psychology? Are you implying WIFOM? If so...

@BigBear: Were these your intentions? WIFOM? Can you refute these allegations?

To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.

One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.

It didn't occur to you that he intentionally voted himself and No Lynch in order to coax Scum into thinking he was an easy target gun for [And Far_Cry took the bait, notably]? T'was the first thing to pop into my head... but maybe I have a slight advantage from being more familiar with his play, and I shouldn't assume everyone should recognize the same?

I don't have much to say about Looker's points, other than that BigBear voting No Lynch doubtfully had anything to do with my three random votes [yes they were "the most", but still....

three

, no where near the majority vote needed]. Aside from that, the progression of events were just... convenient/coincidental/ect.

If Far_Cry took the bait, why is BigBear voting for you? And yes, I agree, the three votes were irrelevant and it was, indeed, a coincidence. My mistake.

[Shrinehme]

If Far_Cry took the bait, why is BigBear voting for you?

I'm not psychic... that was just my take on BigBear's actions. He may have a completely different agenda.

[Looker]

So you don't feel as if this is a bus for future reference? (Distancing?)

[Peabody]

Far_Cry's play has been quite strange to me. During the RVS, I have been sitting back and just noting little behavior, and I didn't like things that I saw from Far_Cry thus far.

Far_Cry's post 59 and post 60 makes me a bit uneasy. I think it is a bit strange to failvote and then revote during the RVS. It's a vote that doesn't matter anyway..

His vote on BigBear really does seem as Shrinehme says. It looks as if BB were baiting someone and FC took the bait. BB is being an easy target right now, but that does not mean he is above questioning.

Gambit, BigBear?

[Peabody]

So you don't feel as if this is a bus for future reference? (Distancing?)

Are you referring to Shrinehme and BigBear or Far_Cry and BigBear?

[Looker]

I have no reason to discount either.

[Peabody]

Who specifically did you mean in post 110, Looker?

[Shrinehme]

So you don't feel as if this is a bus for future reference? (Distancing?)

So... you think Far_Cry is bussing BigBear? I don't really see it... what makes you think that?

@EtherealCookie

: What do you think of BigBear's recent posts?

[Sanjay]

Okay, just throwing it out there, shoot it down if you want.

You get the most votes, the closest to a lynch, and then BigBear votes no lynch.
Far_Cry votes BigBear for wanting a no lynch.
You vote Far_Cry.

Shoot it down.

To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.

One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.

No offense to Looker, but this is a terrible theory.

Firstly, it supposes that BigBear is stupid enough both to believe that the RVS wagon on Shrinehme is enough of a threat to his scumbuddy to take drastic action.

Secondly, it supposes that BigBear is stupid enough to believe voting no lynch would work. Sure, it could serve to distract from his scumbuddy, but I don't really see how distracting from your scumbuddy by heaping a bunch of suspicion on yourself is a good idea.

Thirdly, it supposes that scum are going to vote to help out their scumbuddies even in the random voting stage, when the threat of lynching is very low.

unvote: nook

vote: ConfidAnon

[EtherealCookie]

Vote: EtherealCookie

Don't leave me out of the fun!

[Looker]

So you don't feel as if this is a bus for future reference? (Distancing?)

So... you think Far_Cry is bussing BigBear? I don't really see it... what makes you think that?

@EtherealCookie

: What do you think of BigBear's recent posts?

What I was throwing out in Post 110 was in regard to you, Shrinehme.

[BigBear]

Vote: EtherealCookie

Don't leave me out of the fun!

Copy Cat.

[Far_Cry]

Vote: EtherealCookie

Don't leave me out of the fun!

Shrinhme asked you a question which you failed to answer. Please do so.

Vote: EtherealCookie

Don't leave me out of the fun!

Copy Cat.

You also failed to ask mine/shrinehme's question. Please do so.

Far_Cry's play has been quite strange to me. During the RVS, I have been sitting back and just noting little behavior, and I didn't like things that I saw from Far_Cry thus far.

Far_Cry's post 59 and post 60 makes me a bit uneasy. I think it is a bit strange to failvote and then revote during the RVS. It's a vote that doesn't matter anyway..

His vote on BigBear really does seem as Shrinehme says. It looks as if BB were baiting someone and FC took the bait. BB is being an easy target right now, but that does not mean he is above questioning.

Gambit, BigBear?

Well, the thing is that I'm a picky person which means that I really want my votes bolded, tags fixed etc. I fail to see why this make me scummy (or strange, for that.)

So you don't feel as if this is a bus for future reference? (Distancing?)

So... you think Far_Cry is bussing BigBear? I don't really see it... what makes you think that?

@EtherealCookie

: What do you think of BigBear's recent posts?

Me bussing BigBear? How could anyone know that BigBear and I are scum by page 5? Psychic?

And by the way, how am I bussing him just by putting a vote on him?

[EtherealCookie]

Oh hey, here's a question for me.
Hold on a moment.
He switches his vote a lot in the same posts and he's mean to other people(!!!!). I don't know why he'd vote for No Lynch either.



Sanjay, I hope, isn't serious about "catching all three mafia."

[quote=Shrinehme]Looker is likely Godfather; Sanjay merely a Goon. [/quote]
I don't know how he knows a godfather even exists. Honestly, half the posts in this thread aren't serious.

I don't like Far Cry's personal attacks, but I don't see anything scummy with him.

I'm just jumping on the Shrinehme bandwagon because I don't get good vibes from him.

Vote: Shrinehme

[EtherealCookie]

God damn it, I forgot the quotes around his name. I always do that.

[BigBear]

Unvote:
Vote: EtherealCookie

I think you put shrine at L-1, which is too close to a lynch for my liking.

I'll answer the other questions shortly. Just slightly busy.

[EtherealCookie]

L-2 from my counting.