Perfectionist Mafia - Resultas

dramonic · Post Post #20 (isolation #0) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:19 am

Hoy!

Vote: SW

dramonic · Post Post #31 (isolation #1) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 6:40 am

Why I'm voting you SW?

Cause you are you, of course!
And I don't like your avi

dramonic · Post Post #43 (isolation #2) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:44 am

But when I use Snow I think of SNow_Bunny...

Also, what gender is that person in your avi? I'm not even sure.

dramonic · Post Post #56 (isolation #3) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:35 am

That avatar looks like some guy out of a very kinky gay porn.

dramonic · Post Post #60 (isolation #4) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:28 pm

my exes are not kinky

dramonic · Post Post #62 (isolation #5) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:39 pm

Why hello, my suave little fellow!

dramonic · Post Post #64 (isolation #6) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:50 pm

haha

dramonic · Post Post #66 (isolation #7) » Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:15 pm

that's about as logical as... wait no, it's not logical at all.

dramonic · Post Post #82 (isolation #8) » Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:01 am

He kind of asked you to answer your question, not someone else's. Noted, however.

@Wicked: Most of my posts have been fairly useless, but considering we're only four pages into the game I don't think it's any dramatic.

On a more serious note:

Unvote
Vote: Sanjay

dramonic · Post Post #108 (isolation #9) » Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:21 pm

A bunch of silly comments about self-vote, added to answering other people's question without answering his own, give me a slight scum-vibe.

dramonic · Post Post #135 (isolation #10) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:05 am

Personally I like BC's post (although I wasn't one of the voters, so I'm not exactly targetted XD)

dramonic · Post Post #150 (isolation #11) » Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:05 am

Gawd the arguing around here is so very pointless. Who cares about SW's syntax?

Competing bandwagons are fairly protown in my opinion, however this isn't a competing bandwagon, it's hysteric tunneling from both SW and Saberwolf. Stop ripping each other's hair out and get in the game (hypocrite, right?)

As for me, I need to do a thorough reread

dramonic · Post Post #163 (isolation #12) » Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:24 pm

your 3 points agaisnt me are pretty much the same Wicked.

dramonic · Post Post #179 (isolation #13) » Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:29 am

I'm so calling him squid

dramonic · Post Post #194 (isolation #14) » Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:45 am

posting from my wii, on which its real straining to read. Will post content tomorrow

dramonic · Post Post #199 (isolation #15) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:23 am

so...

SolemnJ seems to have a hard time participating, he was supposed to post 4 days ago (by his own word) and just vanished.

Also his ISO 1 is antitown in a whole new fashion

Unvote
Vote: SolemnJ

Yes, I'm ignoring the pointless debating

dramonic · Post Post #201 (isolation #16) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:46 am

He's unwilling to be useful

dramonic · Post Post #203 (isolation #17) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:12 am

isolation post #1

use the display post from previous bar at the bottom of the screen

dramonic · Post Post #205 (isolation #18) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:27 am

glad to help.

dramonic · Post Post #221 (isolation #19) » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:27 am

Grimmy's Pokemon Madness would be my latest scum game, along with Mitey's Pie E7.

You can judge how i play as scum from there. I'm not so good when it comes to self-judging.

dramonic · Post Post #234 (isolation #20) » Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:18 am

So much has happened to change my vote!

Oh wait, nope, not at all.

dramonic · Post Post #248 (isolation #21) » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:48 am

what the other two said.

dramonic · Post Post #249 (isolation #22) » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:48 am

what the other two said...

dramonic · Post Post #253 (isolation #23) » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:17 pm

My Milked Eek wrote:dramonic. You do know that you're parroting #248 with your #249?

Yes, it was unintentionnal double post. It said I couldnt post the sam message again, but didnt show I posted. so i modified it but it posted both ^_^;

dramonic · Post Post #302 (isolation #24) » Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:35 pm

I'll have the reread up tomorrow, got home less than 2 hours ago and had buncha stuff to do.

also, its 2:30 AM @_@

dramonic · Post Post #326 (isolation #25) » Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:12 pm

Holy... that post is huge 0_0

getting done with the reread.

dramonic · Post Post #329 (isolation #26) » Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:58 pm

Santos wrote:
My Milked Eek wrote:I did the quick math.

Averages of emoticons/posts per alignment for Snow white.

Town : 0.51 e/p (ignoring outliers, it's 0.35 e/p)
Scum : 0.89 e/p
Third party : 1 e/p

In this game,
Before I noted her of her emoticon use : 1.80 e/p
After I noted it : 0.36 e/p

Am I going somewhere with this? I don't know. I should have counted words in each topic as well but that's a bridge (or five) too far. But judging from the data above, there's something off. To switch from an excessive use of emoticons to 1/6th of that after someone noted it and saying you're expressive doesn't add up to her emometa.

I'll sleep on it.
And yes, I was this bored.
Can this be mafia wiki'd, please?

Well, it's not a general consensus, it's specific to SW :S

dramonic · Post Post #349 (isolation #27) » Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:02 pm

You're at L-4, get off the paranoia act.

dramonic · Post Post #394 (isolation #28) » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:27 am

What's this about Sposh?

dramonic · Post Post #453 (isolation #29) » Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:50 am

The claim is no good, considering it doesn't even reflect the first page's roles correctly. If this were a close setup I'd keep my vote off, but her claim doesn't even resemble the one in the rules

Unvote
Vote: SW

dramonic · Post Post #496 (isolation #30) » Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:26 am

Mufasa and Dramonic are also voting twice on the count. Additionally, there are 8 votes on BC, not 7

@Wicked: More than just the flaws you pointed out.

dramonic · Post Post #499 (isolation #31) » Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:11 pm

This just keeps getting better and better.

dramonic · Post Post #532 (isolation #32) » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:23 am

I maintain my stance that SW is less credible than BC.

dramonic · Post Post #556 (isolation #33) » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:43 am

=_=

This was an irrationnal lynch.

dramonic · Post Post #558 (isolation #34) » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:54 am

because BC was a more credible cop than SW. That's what I believe anyways.

dramonic · Post Post #564 (isolation #35) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:40 am

Someone getting his soul ripped to teensy shreds :3

dramonic · Post Post #579 (isolation #36) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:33 pm

if the only reason you guys think BC is unlynchable is because Max is MIA, you need to relax XS

dramonic · Post Post #598 (isolation #37) » Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:14 pm

Seems like something like twilight.

dramonic · Post Post #621 (isolation #38) » Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:52 pm

May I be enlightened with the reasoning for your vote? I don't think I did anything to deserve it.

Mufasa's probably right about the roles.

dramonic · Post Post #634 (isolation #39) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:47 am

Snow White wrote:No results.

How come?

@Dramonic. Nothing remotely to say to Saber?

I asked him to explain his case already.

@Dramonic. What is Mufasa right about the roles? I cant really remember much from you, what do you think of the game to date?

Reread, misattribution, I thought Almighty's post was Mufasa's

dramonic · Post Post #642 (isolation #40) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:35 am

On what principle do you suppose there aren't 4 mafiosos, counting the GF?
I agree if there was a traitor he's out of order though.

dramonic · Post Post #644 (isolation #41) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:45 am

Unvote
Vote: Mufasa

You slipped

dramonic · Post Post #645 (isolation #42) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:46 am

Vig, dont bother counterclaiming. Mufasa scumslipped without the CC.

dramonic · Post Post #657 (isolation #43) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:02 pm

Well, let's look at the facts here.

Mufasa believes his kill was redirected can work
Mufasa says he's vig can work
Mufasa says his kill was redirected to someone who died from mass injection. How does that ever fit in a vig's flavour kill???

I mean, if he's vig I believe he'd take the time to understand his own kill type.

dramonic · Post Post #660 (isolation #44) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:17 pm

Snow White wrote:And on that how do we know there's not four mafiaso's, read the role pm's.

Good point.

dramonic · Post Post #662 (isolation #45) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:28 pm

I know, I was agreeing with why there couldnt be more than 2 other mafiosos barring traitor who's Out of order ayways.

dramonic · Post Post #676 (isolation #46) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:41 pm

almightybob wrote:saber: there's no debate about an SK. There definitely is one, because wickedestjr was daykilled, and the only person able to daykill (from the rolePMs) is the SK.

I've been saying this for a while, I would have thought everyone would know this by now.

QFT

dramonic · Post Post #687 (isolation #47) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:21 pm

xRECKONERx wrote:
Mufasa wrote:if i did it wasnt intentional
...then it wasn't a breadcrumb.

Well if he eats messy there are bounds to be a few scattered crumbs...

dramonic · Post Post #689 (isolation #48) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:24 pm

crumb: a very small quantity of something

Not necessarely bread, the scrap can be seen as crumbs

dramonic · Post Post #691 (isolation #49) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:50 pm

Considering the traitor has no NK, I'd say he's not the priority. As long as we kill all the scum, the best he can do is a tie <_<

dramonic · Post Post #694 (isolation #50) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:13 pm

dramonic · Post Post #695 (isolation #51) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:16 pm

Considering one cannot be protected agaisnt a SK kill as far as I can see, I'd say it's plausible to want to draw out the vig to get rid of him as quickly as possible, even if that means getting rid of a mafia member. They could have just forgotten thatt vig gets only one kill since he failed.

Course, now that the vig is useless, he might as well CC.

dramonic · Post Post #698 (isolation #52) » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:39 pm

Sanjay wrote:dramonic, here is what I am thinking:

1) There is a vigilante.
2) The vigilante doesn't have any more powers and has no special reason not to counterclaim.

Do you have a problem with 1 or 2?

Those aren't reflections, they are fact.

I'll be extremely surprised if nobody CC, but after some reflecting I wouldn't want the hammer without the CC.

dramonic · Post Post #713 (isolation #53) » Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:13 am

Santos and Reck should wait to be sober before posting.

dramonic · Post Post #736 (isolation #54) » Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:45 am

*twiddles thumbs*

I hate when a game stalls due to a damn pair of lurkers =_=

dramonic · Post Post #757 (isolation #55) » Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:32 pm

hmm? Why suave in particular?

dramonic · Post Post #759 (isolation #56) » Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:44 pm

Thank you, cookie boy

Unvote
Vote: Suave

works for me.

dramonic · Post Post #790 (isolation #57) » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:50 pm

Love ya too Suave XD

Which game are we referring to here, there are kind of a lot ^_^;

dramonic · Post Post #816 (isolation #58) » Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:52 am

So you say two potential cops and then discredit the one claimed cop we have?

err...

dramonic · Post Post #850 (isolation #59) » Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:03 am

call it gut.

dramonic · Post Post #855 (isolation #60) » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:18 am

he's OMGUSing me.

I've played a lot with Suave and I haven't seen him do that as town, EVER.

dramonic · Post Post #886 (isolation #61) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:26 pm

almightybob wrote:I like e-knits' logic/analysis stuff. Makes good sense to me. Also of note: dramonic wasn't on the BC wagon.

FoS: dramonic

Just like a bit less than half the players in the game. <_<

dramonic · Post Post #892 (isolation #62) » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:44 pm

Oh yes, that will do the town good <<

dramonic · Post Post #904 (isolation #63) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:14 am

Yes, but I'm sure you'd agree that scum are more likely to either
1) be on a different wagon in the hopes of saving their godfather, or
2) leap on at the last minute when his lynch is inevitable, to get some bussing in.

3) Also, if memory serves you were the person who voted for SW immediately after her claim and put her at L-1, when she was (at that point) the unCCed cop. Which I believe prompted Reck's threat of "replacing the fuck out of this game".
And you also said that BC's cop claim was far more credible than SW's, but never explained why. To me, neither seemed much more credible than the other.

1) Usually yes, but that 's not a proof against me, that's a proof against, well, the forementionned people.
2) Which I did not do.
3) Well, I explained my vote in ISO 29.
I felt that when BC counterclaimed, his claim was more remnant of the one on the first page. Also, CCing as scum on day 1 is not wise, so I expected the scum to be SW.

On a sidenote, the fact that the GF of all possible roles CC is just ridiculous.

dramonic · Post Post #906 (isolation #64) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:33 am

PM wrote: You are the Police Detective. You can investigate once per night a player, and you will (unless roleblocked) receive a result of their mafia status (Mafia/Not Mafia), however, along with your investigation you must predict your result. If you are correct you can continue using your role, however if you are incorrect you can no longer use your role.
You sanity is not confirmed.

You win if all anti-town players are dead.

Note: Sanity is not taken into account, so if an insane player predicts town but gets mafia it will be incorrect, so they must always (technically) guess incorrectly

Snow White wrote:
Im town cop. Yay!!! Oh wait no... outted town cop. Oh noes!

Ironically this probably explains the over use of emoticons at the beginning of this game. But hey! Any non believers. Lynch me and lets find out! :devil: But frankly anyone who puts any further votes on me should probably be looked at before the community can get their say.

BTW. im aware there is likely one other cop out there as my sanity is not assured. Eep! Plan was to investigate Wicked... someone who i thought had a higher likelihood of being innocent and going from that as my sanity, provided he turned up innocent. If he was guilty i was then going to wait till night2 if i lived so long as to pick someone else i considered highly innocent or highly scum and then work off that. Complicated! But then again so is this role tbh. :/

Anywho! Any questions shoot. But im as sick as a dog atm. Ill get back to you as soon as.

Not... remotely... credible/similar.
Just do the comparison.

dramonic · Post Post #1014 (isolation #65) » Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:31 pm

For a moment I thought I had caught a DV... Then I noticed its not on the possible role list and its just a typo by the mod =_=;

dramonic · Post Post #1016 (isolation #66) » Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:38 pm

I know right?

Look, we're lynching SW, as she's scum or SK. I'll vote once she has said... something I guess.

dramonic · Post Post #1023 (isolation #67) » Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:30 am

Unvote
Vote: Snow White

*bonk*

dramonic · Post Post #1031 (isolation #68) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:02 am

If there is a masonry, now would be a nice time to claim.
If we mislynch today we're pretty much screwed if both kills hit town.

dramonic · Post Post #1046 (isolation #69) » Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:42 am

I abducted it. I'd like everyone to answer the following:

Are you in a masonry?

If masons claim, we'll have a good bunch of confirmed town. It'll make it pretty easy to net the remaining scum/SK.

dramonic · Post Post #1058 (isolation #70) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:16 pm

For people who dont understand the comment:
Mufasa just got banned indefinitely.

dramonic · Post Post #1075 (isolation #71) » Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:45 am

Well, no masonry in this game then, unless FL and Manho are having serious mason issues XP

dramonic · Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 am

thats a lot of content Santos =_=

dramonic · Post Post #1101 (isolation #73) » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:18 am

I felt that when BC counterclaimed, his claim was more remnant of the one on the first page. Also, CCing as scum on day 1 is not wise, so I expected the scum to be SW.

dramonic · Post Post #1112 (isolation #74) » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:40 pm

he's gone into lurking

dramonic · Post Post #1129 (isolation #75) » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:05 pm

Oh noes, I'm really scummy!

...why?

dramonic · Post Post #1144 (isolation #76) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:11 pm

I'm the one active lurking yet you still manage to miss my explanation for not being on that wagon 3 times???

dramonic · Post Post #1146 (isolation #77) » Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:31 pm

his conclusion probably has something to do with his vote...

dramonic · Post Post #1148 (isolation #78) » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:10 am

no, I'm replying to his accusation. I don't consider to be active lurking, since I dont think my content is fluffy goodness.

dramonic · Post Post #1158 (isolation #79) » Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:05 am

Unvote
Vote: Manho

I prefer this one.

dramonic · Post Post #1161 (isolation #80) » Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:21 am

oh, err... l-1 and stuff.

dramonic · Post Post #1170 (isolation #81) » Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:05 pm

did the power of choo choo just hammer?

dramonic · Post Post #1175 (isolation #82) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:42 am

considering the two antitown are of different faction, we're not in that big of a pickle long as one of them shoots down the other <<

that is, if we mislynch.

dramonic · Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:50 am

This looks nothing like pokemon madness. In that one I was trying (or convincing) everyone to vote the way I wanted them to. I'm not doing that here.

Oh, and this IS a mislynch, I wouldnt put that many votes , that quickly.

dramonic · Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:18 am

viewtopic.php?t=12130
that game

dramonic · Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:27 am

havent I played with you as town and scum sanjay ?

dramonic · Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:05 pm

because he tried to create a case out of thin air to vote me in a completely random moment and that is very scummy.

dramonic · Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:53 am

arent you dead?

dramonic · Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:33 pm

Sanjay wrote:Wait a second, dram, when did you think we had played together with me as town?

I'm just pretty sure we've played at least 2~3 games together, but I only recall a you-scum in lovers.

dramonic · Post Post #1205 (isolation #89) » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:29 am

manho is scum or SK,, weither you want to believe me or not. Surprised he hasnt hammered me yet. Then again, it would reveal him when I flip townie.

the other killer out there should seriously consider shooting him down if they want any chance at winning.

dramonic · Post Post #1208 (isolation #90) » Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:39 am

yes, yes I am.
Your point being?

dramonic · Post Post #1209 (isolation #91) » Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:40 am

Vote: Manho

There. Now you can quickhammer me in fear that someone might change from my wagon and hammer your scummy little person

dramonic · Post Post #1211 (isolation #92) » Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:26 am

it's baseless.
Manho just popped in one day saying I was very scummy, without any other explanation.

dramonic · Post Post #1214 (isolation #93) » Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:31 am

MrSuave wrote:
dramonic wrote:manho is scum or SK,, weither you want to believe me or not. Surprised he hasnt hammered me yet. Then again, it would reveal him when I flip townie.

the other killer out there should seriously consider shooting him down if they want any chance at winning.
um... if you were town, wouldn't we lose then? silly scum trix are for kids!

Not if the sk kills scum...