And it's suspicious that his defense for you seemed hardly reasonable. Secondly, the fact he voted me is more suspicious. If he just defended against my points, I'd be fine with that. But the fact he voted for me, along with the fact
you
voted for me with the reasoning that 25% of it was retaliation, when NONE of it should be retaliation, is suspicious.
I admit that my vote is 25% retaliation. But still it strikes me odd that he's so focused on one or two people (mainly manho, tubby and me) which accounts for the other 75% of why i placed my vote the way i did. I've got three ideas for scum at this point.
I'm pretty sure people've already mentioned this: The others don't seem as scummy or haven't posted yet. Hell, I've already mentioned it.
The town creates the "reasons." The scum just have to grab on to those reasons and add a few of their own. Have you played as scum before? (Sorry if that was already answered)
Uhm. Yes. One game off these forums that was poorly done. Secondly, have you ever seen scum grab onto the reasons? It's a bit obvious. They have poor reasoning for why they agree, other than "What he said." They don't bring anything new for suddenly switching the vote as soon as a band wagon starts.
Where did he say he knew it wasn't going to be a tell? The brush-off was after Manho responded (or at least that's what Wrath implied).
Regardless, that was a very pointless post. Even if it didn't get brushed off, how exactly was it going to reveal anything?
So when you're town you don't proofread your posts to see if anything suspicious pops out at you?
Of course I do. But I don't point out what will catch attention and what won't. What's he trying to do, give tips for Mafia? Not to mention it was one of the first posts, and he's already thinking about catching attention.
