Sposh
- I'm not seeing the reasoning here.
I don't need to add any new information when (A) there is none to add and (B) I agree with everything already said!
I think it's kind of hypocritical for Teh to vote me for repeating old reasoning... when Nacho had just said the EXACT SAME THING! He's voting me for regurgitating reasoning, which is what he just did!!!!!!!!!!
This is a little suspicious. He seems to be trying to justify lurking, but that isn't enough for me to jump on the bandwagon.
Is that not what you just did? You agreed with the poster before you and voted the same person... adding on more reasons to it doesn't matter, because when I tried to explain my own personal reasoning, you said I wasn't actually scumhunting, I was just regurgitating information! Does it matter if it's been said before if I agree with it and find it accurate?
In my opinion, you're looking for ME to be the easy target and jumping on MY bandwagon (I had the most votes at the time of your post... would that not make me the EASIEST target?).
This is legitimate, he makes a perfectly valid point.
Why would you unvote? Did you not want to stir up anymore discussion? Unvoting for the sake of unvoting isn't very helpful at all!
Again, I fail to see anything suspicious. MichelSableheart, Nachomamma8, Tehstefan, mind explaining your votes for my sake?
Tehstefan
-
Not posting much in the random voting phase is not a big deal, considering we have a lack of information. Still, does anyone perhaps have any reads on anyone? Any inkling at all is something that should be said, information is good for the town after all.
Sure it is possible to make a case this early in the game, its what the town has to do. You make a case, then the other person either refutes it, or falls victim. Its all you really can do in this phase of the game.
Ok, seems pro-town to me.
57 is a little long to just stick in here, but it seems perfectly pro-town to me.
broncofaninmd, however, is giving off far more scummy vibes to me. He seems to be drilling in on one player, and completely ignoring everything else. He seems to me to be trying to start a bandwagon, and I simply don't like how he's going about it. The bit about ignoring the post concerns me too.
Unvote, Vote:broncofaninmd
This I agree with.
In all I get a town vibe from Teh.
TheBeanBurrito
- Not enough content to get a read. Mostly just agreements or odd statements and promises to post later. Seems like lurking, but he really could just have a lot to do.
Haylen
- Hi Haylen! Have any content to post for us? Your predecessor was the epitome of uselessness.
Jase
- Way too much here to go post by post, so I'll just post my opinion. Seems generally pro-town, the accusation of not answering questions and the ensuing case against him nold no water whatsoever, and he defended himself well enough.
Nachomamma8
- I'm getting a scum vibe here. His accusations of Jase seems like an attempt to start a bandwagon rather than joining one, but to me is equally scummy. He doesn't have any kind of real argument, but he words it well and it sounds convincing. I'm not sure here, but there is a lot of content to sift through.
broncofaninmd - Jase wrote:
broncofaninmd wrote:
Jase wrote:
Sorry, addressed this yesterday, but must've forgotten to hit submit.
Nachomamma8 wrote:
Unvote: MichelSableheart.
Vote: Jase
Please answer all questions addressed to you.
It seems a bit early to vote me for "not answering questions"...this seems a bit suspicious, and I'd like you to address it. Now, I said three votes was too much because it's only one more vote and there could be a quick lynch.
It's actually kinda funny that you vote me for not answering a question when you completely ignore my post 62.
This post specifically claims hes suspicious of you for voting him for not answering questions.
Not for answering questions fast enough.
???
No, no I was suspicious because he voted me for not answering questions before waiting a reasonable time to answer.
Really??
Quote:
It's actually kinda funny that you vote me for not answering a question when you completely ignore my post 62.
Then explain this? [/b]
What are you talking about? There isn't even a contradiction here.
Its a lie, and the way he uses the quotation marks he clearly means "for not answering questions" He even reiterates it in the same post
Again, what ARE you talking about? Why don't you quote this lie for us?
MichelSableheart - Seems pro-town. A lot of content, mostly analysis, will probably be night killed.
"If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh. Otherwise they'll kill you."
