Zaz, why should I have to start discussion about voting no lynch, or voting for myself? Shouldn't it be other players that question me? And not myself? We shouldn't really be having this conversation now. It should have been in RVS. It's all about looking for over reactions.ZazieR wrote:Yet, you never discussed about your No Lynch vote yourself. Eventhough you state you wanted to start discussion. And instead, you changed your vote. How come?Bear wrote:Mostly to start discussion. I felt as if the RVS was carrying on for quite some time.
How serious is the question? Also, didn't you call Sanjay a bandwagoning monster? So how come you bandwagoned here?Bear wrote:To give that Chainsaw Defense against me some merit? Mostly to bandwagon for some discussion.
It also makes your EC vote look bad, as EC actually had a reason for suspecting Shrine.
Not Mastin ._.Bear wrote:Mostly from Mastin.
In all the times he did it, I don't think it has worked. At least, not in my games with him.
And please look at the post that had the defence in it that I don't like.
The VC was a few posts up. How come you missed it?Bear wrote:I'm going to wait until a vote count, to vote.
Why did I bandwagon onto Shrine? Aside from putting pressure, it was also to discredit that "chainsaw defense" argument against whoever (me I think). They thought I voted no lynch to distract from some one's lynch, It might have even been shrines. I can't remember, and can't really be arsed to find it.
I was voting EC because it looked like he was a twelve year old kid on crack.
Mastin is an inspiration. Where did that Kid go?
I must have just overlooked the Vote Count. I don't know why I requested it.
I would just say, that in his first game, he quit when he was town. I'm not saying that makes him.ZazieR wrote:Wait, are there really players saying that BN fits his town meta by basing it upon activity?
He revealed an alt, in a game that's on going.ZazieR wrote:I don't understand this postBigBear wrote:[piggybacking]
Especially in an on going game :/
[/piggybacking]