If I thought she had claimed flavor, how could I find it scummy for something I didn't know? When I asked, she gave flavor without any fuss, Monkey had refused multiple times.Jazzmyn wrote:But speaking of "checking your facts before posting," your own post 649 (your 6:30 post on page 26) shows that you did not "check your facts before posting" when you called Monkey scummy for his "partial claim" (yourdefinition not claiming flavour with the roleclaim) while you did no such thing when Starbuck made her own "partial claim" and you "thought she had".
Emphasis on the word "if".semioldguy wrote:If I thought she had claimed flavor, how could I find it scummy for something I didn't know?Jazzmyn wrote:But speaking of "checking your facts before posting," your own post 649 (your 6:30 post on page 26) shows that you did not "check your facts before posting" when you called Monkey scummy for his "partial claim" (yourdefinition not claiming flavour with the roleclaim) while you did no such thing when Starbuck made her own "partial claim" and you "thought she had".
First of all, you're not considering how a revealed fakeclaim could help the town, second, I don't see what the movie era has to do with the potential Tramp role. Usually the mafia already knows or has a pretty good idea what their mafia consists of, and could deduce what the town consists of.semioldguy wrote: @Monkey
This is why claiming things such as what movie era a player is from can be bad for the town, when it could help scum narrow down unrevealed potential roles like the Tramp.
Best explanation I can give is that I had a back trauma accident and was in the hospital for a few days, so when I caught up it included both claims as well as other stuff for just this game. I was still being heavily medicated and more than a little out of it so I must have missed that Starbuck hadn't claimed because I thought she had due to others speculating on the viability of her claim as vanilla. Since others were openly discussing Buzz's flavor (which I even joined in on in my post after coming back), I thought that she had given it. I was obviously wrong. I missed the fact that none of the posts discussing flavor at the time of the claim were hers.Jazzmyn wrote:Emphasis on the word "if".
As should be obvious, my point is that you had no townie reason whatsoever to think that Starbuck had claimed flavour when she clearly had not. Yet, according to you - and you alone - failure to claim flavour when roleclaiming is scummy. And you only felt it was scummy for Monkey not to have flavourclaimed when he roleclaimed but you said nothing of the sort when Starbuck roleclaimed without flavourclaiiming.
This does not compute.
Regards,
Jazz
For one, I know that Gorrad isn't the Tramp because of your question, and would have known that Kmd4390 wasn't as well. SinceMonkeyMan576 wrote:First of all, you're not considering how a revealed fakeclaim could help the town, second, I don't see what the movie era has to do with the potential Tramp role. Usually the mafia already knows or has a pretty good idea what their mafia consists of, and could deduce what the town consists of.
You don't know it. You're assuming they are claiming the truth.(?)semioldguy wrote:Best explanation I can give is that I had a back trauma accident and was in the hospital for a few days, so when I caught up it included both claims as well as other stuff for just this game. I was still being heavily medicated and more than a little out of it so I must have missed that Starbuck hadn't claimed because I thought she had due to others speculating on the viability of her claim as vanilla. Since others were openly discussing Buzz's flavor (which I even joined in on in my post after coming back), I thought that she had given it. I was obviously wrong. I missed the fact that none of the posts discussing flavor at the time of the claim were hers.Jazzmyn wrote:Emphasis on the word "if".
As should be obvious, my point is that you had no townie reason whatsoever to think that Starbuck had claimed flavour when she clearly had not. Yet, according to you - and you alone - failure to claim flavour when roleclaiming is scummy. And you only felt it was scummy for Monkey not to have flavourclaimed when he roleclaimed but you said nothing of the sort when Starbuck roleclaimed without flavourclaiiming.
This does not compute.
Regards,
Jazz
For one, I know that Gorrad isn't the Tramp because of your question, and would have known that Kmd4390 wasn't as well. SinceMonkeyMan576 wrote:First of all, you're not considering how a revealed fakeclaim could help the town, second, I don't see what the movie era has to do with the potential Tramp role. Usually the mafia already knows or has a pretty good idea what their mafia consists of, and could deduce what the town consists of.Lady and the Trampis from 1955, which would be before 1980. That's the point I'm making, which you clearly missed.
Wow, that's the only thing you have to say to that?chamber wrote:go play normals.Starbuck wrote:This is why I really don't like going into the whole flavor debate because it detracts from hunting scum. Now people are just looking for well who's flavor makes the least sense.
Roles being based on a theme and the necessity to be able to fake such roles is one of the key divisions between theme and normal games. Yes we should still scum hunt normally, but when presented with flavour for a role I am going to judge it.Starbuck wrote:Wow, that's the only thing you have to say to that?chamber wrote:go play normals.Starbuck wrote:This is why I really don't like going into the whole flavor debate because it detracts from hunting scum. Now people are just looking for well who's flavor makes the least sense.
/sigh
Neopi wrote:i am Lady from Lady and the Tramp, Super sniffer
im a combination watcher tracker, but i can be distracted by the tramp and niether of us know our alignmentsp
I smell neighbors/lovers.Neopi wrote:both me a nd the tramp who i dont know get the report
and the tramp distraction can only be activated after d2
Nice AtE.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Yeah, the lurking is bad. I still think Starbuck is guilty but evidently everyone else doesn't.
Unvote:
Vote: Neopi
I think I smell a slip here. Monkey's a watcher, and Neopi is a tracker. Hmm.Monkeyman576 wrote:This would fall in line with my power restriction...
Unvote
Vote: Starbuck
I don't think I ever told anyone how they should play. You are reaching here.Monkeyman576 wrote:Add that Starbuck's trying to tell players how to play and psuedo-threatening them, rather than allow the mod to decide what is or isn't allowed doesn't reek of someone who is trying to decipher information, rather someone that is trying to surpress it.
I thought the tramp could only stop his power after day2 ??MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not the Tramp, nor am I affiliated with Neopi. Starbuck's interpretation of my supposed slip is way off. I meant thathe can only use his power after day 2, I lose my power if we lynch a townie, We are both claiming power roles, and both claiming restrictions on our power.
Neopi is claiming that he doesn't know who the Tramp is. You could very well be the Tramp.MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not the Tramp, nor am I affiliated with Neopi. Starbuck's interpretation of my supposed slip is way off. I meant that he can only use his power after day 2, I lose my power if we lynch a townie, We are both claiming power roles, and both claiming restrictions on our power.
There is a difference between could be, and are likely to be.Starbuck wrote:Neopi is claiming that he doesn't know who the Tramp is. You could very well be the Tramp.MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not the Tramp, nor am I affiliated with Neopi. Starbuck's interpretation of my supposed slip is way off. I meant that he can only use his power after day 2, I lose my power if we lynch a townie, We are both claiming power roles, and both claiming restrictions on our power.
Peter Pan is very commonly known, and I forgot who said it early but words like pixie dust, windows, and happiness are almost synonymous with Peter Pan. You could have easily made up your flavor which is what took you so long to claim it.
