page 5:
looker is scumhunting. i guess there's a first for evrything.
103 is horrible, trerible, no good wifomic meta defense that essentially creates a circular pattern of knowledge confirmation. "bear is competent scum, so he wouldn't no lynch as scum, so he must be town, but if i think he's town and he's really scum then he's most certainly competent scum."
106 echoes my thoughts.
107 is way off. shrine distances from bear rather pedantically(is that a word?) points out obvious possible town motivations for bear's play. post reads more as fluff than anything.
108 *facepalm* looker: confid ran the wifom. not fc. not sure why you question one and not the other, especially when you question the one who implies bear might be scum after stating you want to vote for bear. good ol' looker! conclusion: coincidence? whatever.
109 leans more and more scum on shrine.
116 breath of fresh logic. i agree with the vote, but it is inexplained.
117 again: *facepalm* one self voter is enough.
cookie is a bit... spastic. no problem with an L-2 vote on shrine here. unfortunately for us it seems as though the resident jokers of ms have all been gathered together in one thread. at this point a random lynch seems like it might be the best idea. onward.
page 6:
shrine confirms he's scum.
vote: shrine
bigbear wrote:I don't see how WIFOM at this point in the game really helps the town.
then why did you self vote and then vote no lynch? claiming gambit in retrospect(i did it to spark discussion) is lame.
add bear to "willing to lynch" list.
bigbear wrote:The truth is, long and active day ones are very profitable, and me creating this type of discussion is priceless.
^^ yes and no. the price of wifomic self votes and no lynch discussion starters are more often than not trips down wifom lane that do nothing more than spam threads full of useless discussion that is better off taking place in a general theory forum as opposed to a game where players have to replace in and read through pages of crap about nothing.
129 is correct. cases without material to respond to are difficult to respond to.
add cookie to "willing to policy lynch" list.
DRK 131 is a bit non-sequitur. it seems as though shrine is who he finds scummier, but continues attack on farcry for defense of a "bad" vote? i am not following. feels like he should be jumping to shrine here but is choosing not to. filed for future reference.
132 is fail logic by cookie. no surprise there.
DRK now defends shrine. very odd. reads to me like: "lynch shrine, then lynch DRK regardless of the flip."
DRK echoes reasoning of "L-2 out of random stage is bad." fail logic. scum is scum. time is relative.
unvote, vote DRK
not voting shrine is okay, but defending him makes no sense.
139 comes out of the shadows attacking the "easiest" target. lots of quote, not many words...
peabody as well. ^^ read above comment.
if cookie is lynched it should be policy for anti-town behavior, but to imply it is scummy to keep a suspect wagon at L-2 seems counterproductive.
i like 145
i hope we have a vig and i hope its not cookie.
i like 148
i don't like 149. there is no "proper" way to play mafia. posts like this more often come from scum trying to look town. vote stays.
DRK
Shrine
Confid
all for independently scummy behavior.
cookie for policy.
end page 6.
