Open 178 - Assassin in the Palace ~Over @ 232~

[Deuxieme Octopus]

vote: lynx

i'm still sore about that last one...

[Deuxieme Octopus]

unvote, vote: ElectricBadger
FoS: DeatNote

lynx was kidding, sheesh, get over it.

[Deuxieme Octopus]

unvote, vote: ElectricBadger
FoS: DeatNote

lynx was kidding, sheesh, get over it.

Do you their lack of understanding for the joke actually make them worthy of serious suspicion? And why did you vote ElectricBadger and only FOS:DeathNote?

It wasn't serious suspicion at all. Seriously, it was like post 23 of the game, how could I possibly have any real suspicions yet. Just responding to what had been said with another random vote. The reason I voted Badger and only FoS'ed DeathNote was that Badger voted you for but DeatNote only agreed without taking action.

Here's the link to the game me and Lynx played together, Zazie.
Open 169

[Deuxieme Octopus]

Also,

vote: ZazieR

for not condensing all that into one post.

[Deuxieme Octopus]

I think we've exited the random stage.

I just want a bandwagon on ZazieR

[Deuxieme Octopus]

Actually, I'm having a bit of a second thought about Zazie after rereading.

It wasn't serious suspicion at all. Seriously, it was like post 23 of the game, how could I possibly have any real suspicions yet. Just responding to what had been said with another random vote. The reason I voted Badger and only FoS'ed DeathNote was that Badger voted you for but DeathNote only agreed without taking action.

Umm, can you show me, please, any time before when someone (preferably you) "random-FoSed?"

When you use the word "Random" in the context of the "Random Voting Stage," it isn't as exclusive as it is, in say a day-to-day usage. My vote and FoS on Badger and DeathNote respectively were random insofar as they had nothing to do with actual suspicions/scumminess, they were just arbitrary responses to the flow of the thread so far, even if there were technically "reasons" that I did it. But really, unless you're rolling a die, there are no truly random votes; everyone has some reason they pick one player over another in the RVS however arbitrary that reason is. So don't play semantics with me.

[Deuxieme Octopus]

And you still haven't explained if it's a random vote or policy lynch vote. Please do so. [/zazier]

random. would i seriously be advocating a policy lynch for not condensing multiple posts?

If this makes it clear: Do you have any evidence of anybody FoSing someone non-seriously in the RVS before?

Um, no? Doesn't mean it can't be done.

[Deuxieme Octopus]

ebwop:

And you still haven't explained if it's a random vote or policy lynch vote. Please do so.

random. would i seriously be advocating a policy lynch for not condensing multiple posts?

If this makes it clear: Do you have any evidence of anybody FoSing someone non-seriously in the RVS before?

Um, no? Doesn't mean it can't be done.

[Deuxieme Octopus]

thank you for lynching me Vaya