The main reason I was voting for ConfidAnon was suspicious scumhunting:
A few times, ConfidAnon sort of threw around some wiki tells, like
here and
here and
here. Unless pressed he doesn't actually explain why in the specific instance he thinks it is scummy. I think it could be scum trying to make other people look scummy without actually committing strongly to positions.
Also, a lot of his case against DRK is silly. DRK mentioned jesters before nook, but DRK did not start a jester discussion. DRK's answer was reasonable given that, and though this was most of the basis for CA's case, he has not abandoned it. This drew my attention because I feel like scum might be more inclined to hold on to bad cases, because they have less of a feel for what are good cases because they aren't making genuine cases.
I don't think making the initial case against DRK is scummy. I can definitely see why town would do it. But I can't for the life of me understand why it is a good case.
What first caught my attention was
this, which I still don't like. Seems kind of like fence-sitting right now.
I'm not really positive I want the vote on him right now though. A lot of the reasons I think Confid is scum could be written off to personal style.
I'm kind of inclined to switch my vote to DJ if anyone, though I'll re-read him to see if that is justified.