Vi wrote:Infinis and Pads have one more post to redeem themselves.
I predict a failing grade.
Here's why I don't like
Post 213
Roflcopter had read Maemuki as town. VI agreed. Maemuki asked why. 213 is VI's response.
VI wrote:
You're playing transparently in asking questions and demanding answers from people - digging up the information that the RVS frankly doesn't provide.
Alright, VI feels that asking questions and demanding answers is something that townies do, so let's run with that. What happens next?
VI wrote:I has a question though.
Oh, crap, right! VI just said asking questions was a townie thing to do, so he better ask a question.
VI wrote:You've argued both for (174) and against (186) people joining the wagon. Just skimming by I didn't see where you mentioned the result of reading through SpyreX's posts - just that people didn't give what you considered good reasons to vote SpyreX. So what was your individual read on SpyreX?
A mouthful. Let's break it down.
VI wrote:
You've argued both for (174)
VI is saying that Maemuki has argued for people joining the wagon in Post 174. In 172, Maemuki asked CSL what he thought about the SpyreX wagon, and if he would join it. Here are 173 and 174 between CSL and Maemuki.
CSL wrote:
There's alot of people on it, and I do not support an early lynch. No, I will not join it, because I refuse to feed the fire of an early lynch.
Maemuki wrote:
Even if he's at, like, L-6?
And what do you think about SpyreX?
She's asking for clarification on CSL's apparent dislike of early lynches, not arguing in favor of people joining SpyreX's wagon. Where did VI get that from?
VI wrote:
and against (186) people joining the wagon. Just skimming by I didn't see where you mentioned the result of reading through SpyreX's posts - just that people didn't give what you considered good reasons to vote SpyreX.
Here he is saying that in Post 186 Maemuki is arguing against people joining the wagon.
Here's
Post 186
(Quote excluded to save room)
Yup, she clearly argues against the people joining the wagon. But she also clearly states that she doesn't see SpyreX's actions as scummy. Plain as day, in the post that VI referred to, is the answer to the question that he's about to ask.
VI wrote:
So what was your individual read on SpyreX?
Despite having already given the answer, Maemuki was surprised in
Post 218 to hear VI say she hadn't given her opinion of SypreX yet (does that sound like something a townie would forget?), and she posts an answer in
Post 230
(Quote excluded to save room)
Ignoring the fact that SpyreX clearly stated his reason for voting, this whole post is extraordinarily wishy washy. I mean, really, 'he doesn't give any reasons on why we shouldn't lynch him'? Is there a weaker reason to suddenly suspect someone?
I bet if I or crypto (whom I like better since the VT flip of ConfidAnon) posted something like that, VI would be all over it. But he doesn't follow up at all. Notice there's no actual answer to VI's question.
Why was VI not concerned with getting an answer? How did VI not see, in a post he obviously read, the answer to the question he was about to ask?
The answer is that it was a fake question, designed to fit in with his own stated townie standard. It is quite reasonable to further conclude that the question is fake, because the person asking the question is also being false.
The response was not even an answer, and likely fake as well.
I believe both VI and Maemuki are scum. I think VI's scum buddy got a townie read from another townie(Rofl), and he wanted to echo it. He then made sure to put forth a display that was in alignment with the townie values he claimed to see in that buddy.
I encourage a VI or Maemuki wagon.
Mae has more votes (as of the top of page 17), so
vote: Maemuki
hence no post till now as I have just about sobered up now)
Hiphop was the one I remembered, so I singled him out.
