DP12 JeepFest Mafia GAME OVER

[EnterYourNameHere]

I will have limited access for the next few days. So I'm not going to random vote vote anyone right now in case I can't get on to change it, so I'll just throw on a

random FoS: Nanook

.

[EnterYourNameHere]

No more 12-hour workdays for me. I'm back.

Anyway, people should stop speculating on who the mafia is role-wise until we actually lynch one of them. Then, we'll actually be able to look for possible patterns. But until then, we need to be speculating on which PLAYERS are scum, and not which roles are.

FOS: Axelrod, SaberKitty, MeMe, the_silent_speaker, and anyone else that was discussing this that I missed

.

Vote: Vesuvan

. He posted only an hour after someone commented on his absence. It's obviously not damning evidence, but I think it's the best we have to go on at the moment.

[EnterYourNameHere]

Unvote Vesuvan, vote Peacebringer

. I can't stand it when people try to pass off scummy behavior by saying "that's part of my playstyle."

FOS: PBuG

. To me, that post sounds like "I'm okay with voting for either of those people, cause neither is my scum partner. So I'll join the forming bandwagon."

[EnterYourNameHere]

At this point, I'm not too happy with either of the bandwagons. But I'd prefer PBuG more than olio, so

unvote Peacebringer, vote PBuG

.

[EnterYourNameHere]

I think it would be slightly odd for a player in the game to be a role as well. Therefore, I don't think a player would have SaberKitty as their role...but I don't know for sure. Again, I'll reiterate what I said yesterday: this isn't something we should be worrying about until we kill our first scum.

There have been players that have contributed less than Roland. But right now, I don't have time to look (Nanook comes to mind, but I'd have to reread the thread to be sure). I'll abstain from voting right now, but after I have time to re-read, the person who has contributed the least is most likely going to get my vote.

[EnterYourNameHere]

OK, just upon a quick glance, Nanook posted twice today, so he's probably been more active than I thought. But I'm sure there are others. I'll look later.

[EnterYourNameHere]

Well, it's possible that he originally had, say, me as a role in this game, and when he saw that I joined, changed the name to someone else. But I get your point.

[EnterYourNameHere]

Same as Stoofer for me, except I can probably post later today.

[EnterYourNameHere]

DP has used the junkie role before (see DP11, and I'm sure he's done it before that too). So I believe PB's claim for now (though, does anyone know if Hey_Herb actually does a lot of drugs?).

TSS's logic is good, but I think we should wait to see how many of those scenarios are true (ie, the parts about SK being scum or not) before acting on it. For example, if SK turns out to be scum, a CA lynch is pretty poor.

FOS Vesuvan and Axelrod

. Both jumped on the CA bandwagon rather quickly, and did not initially supply much reason. I am not sure which is a better vote, so I won't vote for either quite yet.

[EnterYourNameHere]

Vote Axelrod, FOS Commodore Amazing

. I am a bit concerned with the way both of you have so quickly jumped on the fledgling Someone bandwagon. Axelrod gets the vote over Commodore due to my earlier FOS on him.

I'm still not quite so sure I understand the allure of the Someone wagon. I'm going to re-read the past few pages, but anyone care to explain?

[EnterYourNameHere]

Ugh. Can another player call me paranoid now? This post REALLY bothered me, and I hope it bothers everyone else too.

It bothers me too. A lot. If it wasn't for the deadline, I'd push for a Commodore lynch today.

Unvote Axelrod

, that's not doing anything. I am not sure which of our leading bandwagons is better--personally, I'm not too fond of either. For now, I believe I will hold my vote.