In response to your "bs" questions claim:
But when the RVS has already ended, is it scummy to attempt to extend it?
By this point, you were trying to extend the RVS and defending that by saying explaining that the RVS was lackadaisical and fun. Had you said yes, we learn that either you 1) don't realize your own actions, or 2) just made an extremely prevalent scum slip. Had you said no, we would've learned that it was just a matter of opinion. But since you refused to answer my question, I learned that you are extremely paranoid and don't want to make yourself look any scummier than you already are, or just lazy.
Do you believe that the RVS is beneficial to town?
Again, a simple yes or no question that you refused to answer, which would end up in results similar to the last one.
I thought that was damn good reasoning..and what'd u do after it..ask bs questions which by the way you didnt answer mine.
If you don't answer my questions, do you honestly think I'm going to answer yours?
Argue this logically against me...PUHleease. Tell me which scenario you think the scum player is more likely to act.
1. Do you think scum in general take a more careful approach towards games? Making sure to play as flawlessly as possible?
2. Do you think town is more or less likely to take a laid back approach towards the beginning of a game?
Just tell me logically which makes more sense.
There's an equal chance of both. Some scum play carefully because it's their first time playing, or they are extremely paranoid of being lynched. Other scum play like you are now because they believe they can get people to buy the theory "Scum always play careful, right?"
Give me a real question..with some depth to it, and i'll be happy to oblige. I'll help narrow it...on what issue, or thing do you want my opinion on?
Try reading the whole game. I think you'll be able to figure it out from context, or even from the rest of my post.
(Ohh goodies, nacho was 3rd voter on me too )
The Third Vote Theory is only effective if the person placing the vote isn't aware of said theory. Also, if everyone were to buy into that, then no one would actually be lynched because everyone would be afraid of casting the third vote.
While weighing activity is a good thing it shouldn't be the only thing you take into account. Does this mean you like Vi's votes so far? If so why? Also why will Amished posting more make Vi scummier to you or at least the choice harder?
I find the most important thing to do in early day 1 is to get good reads on people. It's also the time when it is easiest to lurk; the most players are playing, so there's a higher chance of being overlooked. Coincidentally, I don't like inactive people because it's just hard to get reads on them.
Now, in the special of Amished v.s. Vi, both of them have made some fairly pro-town votes (in my opinion, at least), and both have been explaining said votes well. However, the little argument they have (over d3x's third party status) seemed strange; I don't like how Amished said that Vi suspected everyone, especially considering most of her vote-hopping was in the beginning of the game, but I don't have a very good feeling about Vi's vote on you. Basically, the only thing that set them apart was activity, which I feel to be anti-town at best.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
)
