I'm getting the feeling people aren't really reading my posts, but I'll repeat my arguments yet again.
1.
Let's disregard for a second the fact that PZ's case was against me. He made a case against a player which was factually wrong. All of the arguments were wrong - no interpretation or subjectivity here, the arguments were completely wrong. (See my posts 280 and 296)
When this is pointed out, he doesn't say anything on the subject and essentially disregards the issue. He even proceeds to accuse me of WIFOM for this.
And this is his best case until the end of D1 - a case based on nonexistent arguments.
Now, why would PZ, an experienced player, have a case based on wrong arguments as his prime case? The option that makes the most sense to me is that he's fabricated it - I find it pretty hard to believe that he wouldn't have understood that his arguments are wrong. Maybe he'd say so at first, but if he was genuine about it, I'd expect him to back off and admit to his mistakes.
So, the only explanation I can find is that he's fabricated the case deliberately, that he knows that it's completely bullshit, and still pursues it. I think it's obvious why I think his actions make him more likely to be scum, then.
2.
The above isn't my only issue with PZ - and I've said this before as well. I think that he created generated confusion with his wagon on SC, which he could've avoided. This confusion has hurt the town. Later, as SC has pointed out near the end of the day and partially in twilight, he didn't attempt to use the information that it has generated. I think that although it didn't work out quite like he'd want it to, it still could have been used as a tool for gaining some info.
Also, there's the whole issue with VP, which I also find a little scummy, but I don't want to recap it for fear of putting words into people's mouths.
Other stuff
As I said I'd do, I reread most of Zorblag's posts. There is a slight fence-sitting vibe coming from him, though it's less severe than the first impression I've had. He's saying various opinions and sharing observations, but doesn't really commit to anything too strongly or push anything too far. He says that it's just an impression and that he does, in fact, commit to things strongly - but it doesn't change the fact that the impression is there.
However, in both games I've played with him he replaced into the game at some point, which may account for me getting the feeling he's more active.
So I'm watching him pretty closely at the moment and he's somewhat scummy in my eyes, but I'll wait to see how he acts today.
Also, I really wish to apologise on my issue with Zorblag's Troll Speak. Maybe it's because English is, technically, my third language, but it is harder for me to read his posts than it is to read "normal" posts.
