Exactly, and that wagon was formed so quickly and with so many oppurtunistic people it's not even funny.Good lord I didn't realize you were at 7. Yea.
Zakeri and a bunch of other people (coughrccough) are enjoying the bandwagon party, I guess.
the imaginality death happened, which led directly to elvis (ding!) and mae (soon to be, ding!)sigma wrote:what happend to the infinis wagon? I'm specifically directing this at charter and rofl.
How does being on CSL or Confid make me look bad? How do my attacks on crypto look bad when we had a scum flip and there's no obvious two groups, which was the main point I was attacking him about, his rebuttal of 'oh, well there's two scumgroups'. And plus, EK took my attack and just latched on and let me do all the dirty work. I'm obviously biased, but that sure didn't look like a scum tagteaming of crypto to me.sigma wrote:charter looks like scum. he was a late joiner on both Confid and CSL wagons, and his attacks on crypto look a lot worse after crypto's flip. crypto was attacking imaginality and e_k hard on day 1, so that may explain his death on N1.
Sure. I defended e_k because I thought that the case against her was not very good - oh and gut. Guess my gut sucks. I thought that the e_k case was pretty much "I attacked a town player and that player died and he saw me as scum so I am scum"...and I was mistaken. My biggest mistake was drinking the wine instead of the lemonade.Defending themselves resolutely is. Explain, thoroughly, your thought process in defending e_k. Be exhaustive. Give us plenty of scum and town reads.
kcharter wrote:Not that I have any interest in debating this further
He never said anything about e_k did he? He never said anything about imaginality, come to think of it. But then again, he said almost nothing about the game. Guess he was too busy tunnel-visioning sigma and me and mislynching CSL. Oh and hypocrisy, he promised a reread. Where is that reread? Infinis, explain.I'll reread tomorrow looking at EP EK
^ in case you missed it.Xylthixlm wrote:Maemuki, what I want from you right now is a town/scum/neutral list including every other player, andbriefexplanations of why for each player. You don't need to do any extra analysis, just post your current impressions off the top of your head.
Your OCD is weak.zoraster 1083 wrote:Please note that if you type vote in bold and then bang your head on your keyboard, I'll probably understand you mean to vote for fhqwhgads
You can stick it to me if you nominate me for the title "Town Scum"pops 1084 wrote:Vi seems to say he lynched him even though she had a town read on him, and that he'd do it again. That's not really how you're supposed to feel.
I don't want to comment on it for a while. It's not anything to do with meta or ongoing games though.sigma 1089 wrote:I want to know why she dropped her case on SpyreX -- vi was going after him hard D1 but that's gone now.
charter 1105 wrote:And, we've already been over crypto was clearly not a mafia kill.There are like a dozen other people who are more of a threat to scum than him.
Wrong. Crypto voted both elvis_knits and imaginality D1. Do you think it's a coincidence that he voted both of our known scum (neither known at the time) and is now dead?charter wrote:And, we've already been over crypto was clearly not a mafia kill. There are like a dozen other people who are more of a threat to scum than him.
@Mae: This explanation only covers your D2 defenses. Let me take you back to 2 times that you defended e_k out of nowhere.mae 1106 wrote:I defended e_k because I thought that the case against her was not very good - oh and gut. Guess my gut sucks. I thought that the e_k case was pretty much "I attacked a town player and that player died and he saw me as scum so I am scum"...and I was mistaken. My biggest mistake was drinking the wine instead of the lemonade.