Geez Vi is hated . . . and do you have reasons?Ectomancer, 413 wrote:Bah, I (and we) need the answer to this for a couple reasons anyhow.
shoot Vi
Sorry, can't comment much today, not much time.
And the reason behind me not shooting you is?don_johnson wrote:not sure if vi's hit. could be only one shot per day for all of us, or not all of us may be able to shoot. let's lynch ecto, let vi die, then someone shoot benmage. that should net us plenty of info and drop someone from each "faction". i like games with mechanics like this because you can move them along. let's not get all lazy and drag this shit out.
what do you mean? are you going to kill me depending on her flip? or are you going to kill me regardless?Benmage wrote:Well im gonna see what rolls with vi. and than kill you.don_johnson wrote:you tell me.
Once again someone who makes statements with no backup.Amished wrote:lol ok. I'm flat out accusing you of active lurking because you're not actually contributing to the game. Your shot wasted a heal of a power role. If you actually want her dead, make a fucking case. DJ at least explained why he shot Vi.
On that note, why did you shoot Vi?
@Benmage: I'm gonna be in another country; so very away.
Didn't even random vote. Voted for the mod of all things he could have done. Is that something Vi doesn't think about? Hell no! He knows exactly what he was doing! Look!Vi wrote:Lies.hohum 2 wrote:All role PMs are out.
Vote: hohum
He did even WORSE than using dice,Vi wrote:The "Random Voting Stage" is a tradition celebrated by Townies who don't want to win and scum that want to burn time until deadline.
The idea behind it is to basically hope that conversation falls out from
it somehow due to the inherent NONrandomness of someone's vote.
By using dice you are not making a nonrandom vote, and therefore doing
nothing to end the useless RVS.
Therefore you are guilty of making the first blatantly anti-Town action in the game and should be wagoned accordingly. Ideally a mod should be able to include some kind of benign conversation starter in the setup.
Voted Ecto and implied there was a reason associated with Nacho'sVi wrote:"hmm, Ecto is being scummy"d3x 72 wrote:]Why did his Vote make up your mind?
Nacho: *vote*
"actually that was a good idea, let's do that"
----
@Nacho: Trim quotes to live. Trim quotes or die. I literally cannot
read that post, and I think I was implicitly accused of something in
there.
---
Less waiting and mored_j 73 wrote:vi: please explain what's wrong with my six (now seven)
posts? i am still waiting on an answer to my first two questions. is
there something else i should be doing?
doing something else while you're waiting comes to mind.
Unvote: Ectomancer(L-6)
Vote: don_johnson
Very next post, more vote hopping and no contribution, again.Vi wrote:I like d_j's list, but not because they haven't explained
their RVS votes so much as because they're already flying under the
radar.
Unvote: don_johnson
Let's see, VP Baltar, Sotty7, Amished, maybe ConfidAnon and
PorkExpress... Oh hay, may as well go with the statistically probable
one.
Vote: VP Baltar(L-6)
This looks like a slip of revealing inside information. At best hisVi wrote:The ConfidAnon wagon is lame and it has all three of the
people I just listed as good scum candidates on it back-to-back-to-back.
Amished 124 looks like the kind of post I would make to force a weak
wagon on someone.
d_j is also on the wagon but he's playing so badly that I'm less
interested in him.
I like my vote but would freely switch to whichever of VP, Sotty, and
Amished has the largest wagon.
This unfortunately has the side effect of alienating half of my fan club
at once, but etc.
More bias and biasing. "Nacho reminds me of me" buddy buddy buddy andVi wrote:On Nacho vs. Ectomancer: Nacho reminds me of me. I don't
think he's scum ATM.
Ectomancer can... well, he knows how that sentence ends.
Wait, I thought Ecto wasn't doing anything? Oh, and here we have Vi'sVi wrote:I don't mind the Nacho wagon as much tbh. I likeSotty7 155 wrote:[Nacho]had four votes by page three you had
nothing really to say about that. What do you think about the two wagons
side by side?
Admiral D3X,I can go with what Ectomancer is doing, the jury is
out on PorkchopExpress, and Benmage is already in front of me.
Do you have any solid insight you would like to contribute to the
conversation?
More vote hopping with no case. Contribution? It's what's lacking.Vi wrote:People who act scummy, and yet happen to be Town (orBenmage 158 wrote:Again, how do you define "scummy
townies"?
are probably Town).
I have no idea why you think it was too early for that suggestion to be
tossed around.
Unvote: VP Baltar(L-6)
Vote: Sotty7
Obviously avoiding me where possible.
Really? Detracting from the Confid that you think is town? Clearly justVi wrote:Well, ISotty7 176 wrote:Deflection how? This is still me not
avoiding you which was your reasoning for voting me in the first place.
So I scum because I have opposite reads to you? I don't buy that. I
disagree with plenty of people but that doesn't make them auto scum in
my book. But it's nice to know how to get on your good side quick (agree
with you at every point)dolike having
followers... :vain:
I'm reading your question about the Nacho wagon as an attempt to steer
the conversation away from the ConfidAnon wagon, which was part of why I
was talking to you in the first place.
Several points here. First, I just demonstrated how Vi listed or votedVi wrote:I'd love for you to elaborate on this, especially considering I don'tAmished 179 wrote:Vi is neutral to me, which has me
worried. I've been able to read her better in other games than I have
here.The rapid vote switching and suspecting everyone doesn't seem
like a good setup to the game either.
suspect "everyone". (although it's true that I don't have much to any
obvious Town reads)
Similarly, listing posts that are scummy without bringing up any
justification neither helps nor convinces anyone.
Why are you so confident - or evenbringing up- that d3x could
be third party?
I've also an eyebrow to raise about how you jumped on the ConfidAnon
wagon and then off it in favor of the equally large Benmage wagon - each
time for reasons thatjust happento have already been mentioned
by others.
Really? And where were your reasons for your vote hopping? MoreVi wrote:I wouldAmished 187 wrote:@Vi: I was the first to actually vote
for CA, so good detective work on that one. In that post (93) I also
expressed my wish to vote for Benmage, so this isn't a new development.
At that point, Benmage didn't have a vote on him either.
be more inclined to go along with this if you mentioned anything about
WHY you wanted to vote either of those people at the time.
Vi wrote:I was (somewhat) obvious Town.
Geez, no contradiction there.Vi wrote:lol, I thought I was acting really scummy in this game - goodd_j 242 wrote:vi is one of those players that always
reads town imo. only way to know for sure is investigate,vig, etc.
for my meta!
Oh wouldn't you like us to believe that? Why don't you shoot me thenVi wrote:Ectomancer: Everyone has a gun. I think that has been made
rather apparent by now.
Completely crap response just making noise. Hello? Ben just said he brought up meta? He certainly didnt deny it, so why does Vi need to respond as though he did? Noise and fluff and trying to look busy, that's it.Vi wrote:If we were in LyLo then I would see your point. At theAmished 283 wrote:@Vi: If d3x is SK, then he's a threat
to the mafia; and if I can lynch a mafia while also adding another
suspect (or even not) then there's a chance that d3x hits mafia, mafia
goes after the "other" killing role; two anti-town killing roles dead
and three mafia dead in a cycle. Obviously a lot of things have to fall
in place, but it's not outlandish. Mafia has always been my priority.
beginning of the game, getting rid of a night-kill is a priority
(especially since if this game is 8-3-1 that sounds like the setup's
fault).
Further, notice what you're doing -making excuses to avoid lynchingwithout providing a suitable
someone you're calling out for scum
alternative that you are as confident in.
Slandering Amished without addressing Amished's point, or really
addressing his reasoning. We are talking about a 3rd party here, and
while they can be lumped into a general "scum" category, the two
certainly are not the same thing.
Comments on Ecto's contribution that he supposedly didnt make. Here proposes a nightless game, but then later refuses to pursue it. What did you think of that ruined your gameplan?Vi wrote:@Amished: I kind of agree with Ectomancer 309 in that rushing a lynch because my vote's going to go away won't do much good.
I disagree about the extra killing though. It occurs to me that if we don't take the game to Night and there aren't many power roles, we'll be better off democratically choosing who to shoot.
Vi wrote:That would be a strong implication from my posts...
But I would recommend you hold your fire until there's a decision made on this game going nightless tbh.
Well ok, let's talk about it.
Great, so there is your reason. There's no point in not killing the day away. So why don't we? Let's do it!Vi wrote:Wait, does that heal actually count? *sets out mod bait*
You don't like anything anyone says except for third party speculation. Or would you rather I die?Ectomancer 318 wrote:I didn't like this much when you wrote it Vi. We don't know the number of power roles and cant exactly take a poll. I had planned to wait until your alignment flip to see where your allegiance lies to evaluate the earnestness of the idea, but if you've been healed, I'd like you to re-evaluate this and either elaborate on why it would work for us, or snuff it as not useful.
Simply put, unless there's a role that gives Town an advantage that outweighs a Mafia night-kill (by which I meanCop) there's no point innotkilling the day away.
While there is a decent possibility for there to exist a Cop in this setup given the flavor, the number of places left to look for one is getting smaller considering there have been two claims so far, so that Cop is already in heightened danger.
Vi wrote: It wounds my soul to move my vote from Ectomancer-scum, but I can hop onto an Amished wagon.
Unvote: Ectomancer(L-5)
Vote: Amished
more vote hopping
This? More lack of contribution while "contributing" with a vote count.Vi wrote:PoE is Process of Elimination.
Vote count looks like this.
Way to avoid actually responding.Vi wrote:no comment necessary that I haven't said a couple of dozen times alreadyEctomancer 380 wrote:blah blah blah blah
MORE vote hopping ffs.Vi wrote:*messes up the vote count*
Unvote: Amished(L-4)
Vote: Ectomancer
Vi wrote:Hypocrisy goes here.
If you're talking about your case on VP Baltar - and if you're not, oh well - then you absolutelyBenmage 398 wrote:I brought up meta...you playing this game?ConfidAnon wrote:Yea, I've read the thread. 360 doesn't do anything for me. Coasting is just as much a scumtell as it is a lazy towntell. *waits for ben to bring up meta* And meta on it's own isn't a case.benmage, 382 wrote:Clearly you didnt understand post 360, nor bother to read 370...But hell i'll indulge you...What about 367 stuck out as particularly good, suddenly so convincing you want to vote me?didbring up meta.
With that said, meta itselfcanmake up a case.
In addition, while "lazy Townies" coast, they're also the ones that hurt less if mislynched.
Exactly, plus other mechnics questions you aren't asking or would even know to ask.don_johnson wrote:not sure if vi's hit. could be only one shot per day for all of us, or not all of us may be able to shoot. let's lynch ecto, let vi die, then someone shoot benmage. that should net us plenty of info and drop someone from each "faction". i like games with mechanics like this because you can move them along. let's not get all lazy and drag this shit out.
Good questions and demand.don_johnson wrote:what do you mean? are you going to kill me depending on her flip? or are you going to kill me regardless?Benmage wrote:Well im gonna see what rolls with vi. and than kill you.don_johnson wrote:you tell me.
if she flips scum wouldn't it make more sense to kill Conifd?
if she flips town, wouldn't it make more sense to shoot Ecto?
i am not following you. maybe its because you are full of shit.
if you are going to shoot then go ahead and shoot. stop being such a pussy.
Ummm yeah. Explain your regardless reasoning. The whole point of shooting Vi is to determine alignment and utilize that information along with other information we will get from this. If you intended to shoot Don regardless, why didn't you shoot him already?Benmage wrote:don_johnson wrote: regardless
Indeed, but if its me or him, its him whose dying. And the dudes tunneled for no apparent reason for quite some time.Amished wrote: Also, I have confidence in Benmage to not shoot dj mostly cause of in game flavor. I'm pretty sure that just slipped his mind (I've seen Ben forget some little things from time to time).
I don't care what you have to say until you've read everything. I have noted that you interupted your read to hurry over and post a strawman to defend your buddy though. Why the rush, rather than finish the read and post a proper reply? Better to sling mud on it first ehh?Amished wrote:I read your {ecto's} first post, and about 3 sections of your 2nd; and I see at least 3 glaring mistakes.
Also, vote-hopping is not inherently scummy. Provide motivation more than picking up on the surface if you're gonna convince anybody.
Why would I reveal my case to Vi until I had enough of one to lynch? I'm not trying to alter Vi's behaviour, which is what you do when you don't like what someone is doing. You vote them, warn them about the nasty behavior and wait for them to change or not. I'm not interested in getting scum to change their play.Amished wrote: Random question: Ecto, why didn't you bring any of this up when I was voting Vi before DJ shot him? Why now instead of you seeing she's more widely read?
Also, I have confidence in Benmage to not shoot dj mostly cause of in game flavor. I'm pretty sure that just slipped his mind (I've seen Ben forget some little things from time to time).
tunneling? please explain. i have "attacked" four different players and implicated two others. how is that "tunneling"?Benmage wrote:Indeed, but if its me or him, its him whose dying. And the dudes tunneled for no apparent reason for quite some time.Amished wrote: Also, I have confidence in Benmage to not shoot dj mostly cause of in game flavor. I'm pretty sure that just slipped his mind (I've seen Ben forget some little things from time to time).
tunneled me. what were ur reasonings for wanting to kill me again?don_johnson wrote:tunneling? please explain. i have "attacked" four different players and implicated two others. how is that "tunneling"?Benmage wrote:Indeed, but if its me or him, its him whose dying. And the dudes tunneled for no apparent reason for quite some time.Amished wrote: Also, I have confidence in Benmage to not shoot dj mostly cause of in game flavor. I'm pretty sure that just slipped his mind (I've seen Ben forget some little things from time to time).
unvote
Well he already shot twice and is out of bullets (at least for today), so he certainly cant shoot you. Your vote is somewhere else, so you don't look to be lynching him. What are you going to do? Wait until tomorrow when he could get another bullet to shoot you? If you don't care about the reveal, then why wait, especially if you are concerned that it could take us to night?Benmage wrote:Indeed, but if its me or him, its him whose dying. And the dudes tunneled for no apparent reason for quite some time.Amished wrote: Also, I have confidence in Benmage to not shoot dj mostly cause of in game flavor. I'm pretty sure that just slipped his mind (I've seen Ben forget some little things from time to time).
again: i have attacked several players besides you. how is that "tunneling"? i.e. what have i done that qualifies as "tunneling"? voting you because i thought you were scum? shooting you? or was it shooting vi and voting ecto? or was it me accusing vp baltar of being scum?Benmage wrote: tunneled me. what were ur reasonings for wanting to kill me again?
I think ecto is scum...there were other people i wanted to shoot over you. Namely VPB. So i didnt want to waste my bullets...don_johnson wrote: ecto's 445 is chock full of good thinking.
i was unaware that i was exhibiting the trait of "zealousness". you have done nothing to convince me that you are not scum. hence my position that you are most likely scum. did i say i was going to shoot you tomorrow?Benmage wrote:
tunneling was a misstatement...i wanted more an idea on your unwavering position on me, and why you still are so zealous to shoot me. So please answer that.