Sooooooo i did an ecto iso read to see if his shot had more meaning...and to see if he deserved to be voted...heres just my notes in word i put down when reading:
0-3 Fluff/rvs.
I like his iso 4 and vote on Nacho.
Iso 7-10 is good. He stays on Nacho’s ass. (note refer to nacho to see questions ignored in iso 9)
Go iso 13 answer to VPB.
15 lightens up on Nacho…don’t really like that after how aggressive he first seemed..a nacho iso read might tie things together.
Iso 22/24(**26/27) makes me want to reread that whole amish d3x 3rd party interplay.
(Note Vi’s vote on Ecto iso 23…Ecto does seem to be doing more agreeing. (liked VPBx2, touché on dj, something to amish’s 3rd party point))
Iso 27 !!?? don’t kill 3rd party D1 because they are also against scum!?!??! They are also against the town..w.t.f…
Iso 28 Vi dislikes Ecto and Amish on 3rd party speculation, and moreover Ecto’s “lack of scum hunting”
(Iso 29 Good vi quote attacking ecto for his iso 27. )
Have to highlight this from iso 29:
Ectomancer wrote: if you have absolute information that a player is 3rd party,
maybe
we could have a nice long argument over whether you lynch them on day 1. I say no.
Iso 37….??? I don’t see how Vi nearly lied….
Iso 39, Nov 26, 2009 3:22 pm…Shoots Vi. Off Ecto’s iso alone it doesn’t seem worthy of doing…(reading this makes me realize I should just reread the thread…yay more self-induced work)
Iso 42…the “Vi case” by amish is weak.
Lol@ iso 44 Ecto sums up his own game…sunofabitch.
Iso 45 seems to be his case/reasoning for shooting Vi. Appears to hold weight. A Vi iso seems in order…but probably just a whole thread reread.
His claim hrmmm.
Conclusion:
I need more information.
"ITT Benmage is making Shakespeare look cool. I need to bring you to my high school." -Vi
"If i must blantantly follow somone a player cannot do better than blindly following benmage" - tubby216