Mafia 102: No-Frills Game Thread(Town wins!)

[The Inquisition]

One of muh and the inquisition is scum.

Which? put your vote somewhere.

---------------------

Super Accurate* Vote Count(as of post 1075):

muh316 - 5(hiphop, mask man, The Inquisition, Empking, peanutman)
crypto - 2(Sando, Kreriov)
peanutman - 1(charter)
Trumpet of Doom - 1(crypto)
Sando - 1(Kaiveran)

Not Voting:Trumpet of Doom, Pyromaniac, muh316

It takes 7 to lynch, 5 at deadline.

*Not guaranteed to be accurate.

[muh316]

One of muh and the inquisition is scum.

Which? put your vote somewhere.

He doesnt want to put me up at L-1 so the mafia can just come up and hammer me.

[hiphop]

One of muh and the inquisition is scum.

Which? put your vote somewhere.

He doesnt want to put me up at L-1 so the mafia can just come up and hammer me.

Than we know they are scum (that is bussing )

You don't have an excuse, where is your vote?

As for pyromaniac- the inquisition is right, put your vote somewhere.

[muh316]

You don't have an excuse, where is your vote?

I choose not to vote yet. I am a slow reader and it will take me some time to get some reads on people so for now my vote is on hold.

[hiphop]

I choose not to vote yet. I am a slow reader and it will take me some time to get some reads on people so for now my vote is on hold.

It is the third day. Surely, you have the first day read already. Looks to me like fence sitting.

[Pyromaniac]

vote the inquisition

because I don't feel like hammering.

[hiphop]

vote the inquisition

because I don't feel like hammering.

How can you hammer?

[Pyromaniac]

Oh I thought muh was at l-1.

[hiphop]

so, now what?

[charter]

Now we all lynch Peanut or Sando.

[hiphop]

Now we all lynch Peanut or Sando.

When they each only have a vote on them. Nice. Let's stick with the muh lynch.

[charter]

I am telling you all, muh is not going to flip scum. If you want to lynch him anyway, that's fine, as long as in the coming days, we make it our mission to lynch scum (Sando and Peanut).

[hiphop]

I am telling you all, muh is not going to flip scum. If you want to lynch him anyway, that's fine, as long as in the coming days, we make it our mission to lynch scum (Sando and Peanut).

Sando and peanut are next on my list.

However, not only is muh scummy, but a policy lynch, I want out of the way. It is better that we lynch him now, than later.

[crypto]

Why not lynch Trumpet?

[muh316]

However, not only is muh scummy, but a policy lynch, I want out of the way. It is better that we lynch him now, than later.

So even if Im not scum its better off for the town to kill me? I think not. Its better to kill the unknown (for more info and for a narrower list) rather than to kill town.

[hiphop]

Why not lynch Trumpet?

mod: how about a prod on Trumpet?

So even if Im not scum its better off for the town to kill me? I think not. Its better to kill the unknown (for more info and for a narrower list) rather than to kill town.

True, except for the fact that you are scum. It is always better to lynch scum, than to lynch who I think is scum.

Still waiting for that vote.

[Sando]

However, not only is muh scummy, but a policy lynch, I want out of the way. It is better that we lynch him now, than later.

You seem to be starting to try and remove any potential blame for a town-flip...

There is definitely scum on Muh's wagon. It's going too easily and too quickly, with too little discussion. Any movement away from the wagon is violently rejected, and selective reading seems to be prevalent. There have been numerous stupid cases made (like charters 'you wanted pom lynched, oh wait no you didn't, but I still think you're scum') that just completely defy logic.

Muh has done nothing to erase my suspicions of him D1, in fact quite the opposite. But I never thought both him and Bigmc would be scum, and this wagon is so terrible, I can't think that he's scum.

you misrep charter's case on you and subsequently try to counter his arguments using said misrep.

Doh, I think I had muh and Pom blurred together in my head

And you want to tell me that I misrepped him? You are getting sillier and sillier. Charter claimed that I was a major factor in getting Pom lynched on D1 (I wasn't, that was crypto), and when I called him on his misrep/mistake, whatever you want to call it, he admitted he was wrong.

He then accuses me of defending Bigmc, and completely ignores the multitude of quotes from crypto actively going out of his way to defend a confirmed scum AND get a townie lynched.

Yeah total misrep from me...

[Kreriov]

Well, I haven't read anything since page 43. Check it out, Crypto is once again being a crude, foolish boor. I see no reason to have to put up with him at all.

@Mod:

I see no reason I should have to put up with Crypto's language or attitude. Please modkill or replace him. (I submit post 1058 thru 1060 as examples.) If you are unwilling or think this is unwarranted, please let me know. I will then respectfully request replacement and appologize for putting added stress on you. I certainly know how hard it is to find replacements right now, but at the same time do not feel I or anyone should have to put up with childish people like Crypto who seem to think that because they are hiding behind a computer screen they can act in such an offensive manner.

[crypto]

Good Lord, Kreriov, are you really that fragile? I've said nothing seriously offensive. Stop turning a game into your personal self-righteousness playground.

[charter]

Crypto, your posts are offensive and unnecessary.

[crypto]

They're offensive to a degree, but I don't appreciate Kreriov's approach.

Preview edit: Okay, yeah, my snide initial comment was wholly unnecessary, though I really don't see how that sort of stuff is

offensive

. Anyway, I'll tie my tongue from here on out, because this game can't afford any more replacements, especially one for a silly reason like this.

[charter]

And you want to tell me that I misrepped him? You are getting sillier and sillier. Charter claimed that I was a major factor in getting Pom lynched on D1 (I wasn't, that was crypto), and when I called him on his misrep/mistake, whatever you want to call it, he admitted he was wrong.

He then accuses me of defending Bigmc, and completely ignores the multitude of quotes from crypto actively going out of his way to defend a confirmed scum AND get a townie lynched.

I made a mistake with who I was accusing Sando of preferring over Bigmc. He's trying to take that and undermine my case, which isn't going to work. It doesn't matter WHO Sando preferred over Bigmc, just that he thought Bigmc was always suspicious, but not suspicious enough to vote him. That's the main point, it is irrefutable, and Sando screaming "look at Crypto, he did it too!" doesn't mean that Sando didn't do it or that Sando isn't scum.

[charter]

Not sure who I'm voting, but now I'm back to Sando as being scummiest, probably because Peanut just isn't posting as much.

unvote, vote Sando

[Sando]

It doesn't matter WHO Sando preferred over Bigmc

So wait, the fact that I preferred someone who is still alive (so we don't know their alignment), and who many people still find scummy, is worse than someone who not only defended Bigmc MORE, but actively went after what we know is a townie all of D1?

Your case is entirely predicated on me doing something that crypto did more of, and completely ignores that crypto also got a townie lynched in the same time.

That's the main point, it is irrefutable

I've stated that there's nothing more I can say on the matter, I'm not trying to refute your point. But you're very clearly defending a player who utterly refused to find bigmc scummy on D1, and got a townie lynched.

[hiphop]

You seem to be starting to try and remove any potential blame for a town-flip...

I doubt there will be any blame.

There is definitely scum on Muh's wagon. It's going too easily and too quickly, with too little discussion. Any movement away from the wagon is violently rejected, and selective reading seems to be prevalent.

All the discussion took place day 1 and day 2. Why do we need anymore?

Muh has done nothing to erase my suspicions of him D1, in fact quite the opposite. But I never thought both him and Bigmc would be scum, and this wagon is so terrible, I can't think that he's scum.

Muh is scum, muh has connections. See post 1070 Also notice the voting pattern from muh.

Votes no lynch. Bmc supports this afterwards.
Votes Staple after Bmc. (Muh notes that he is not bwing with bmc.)
Votes SC- Because he was attacking bmc.
votes cryto- Bmc agrees with this point and also votes crypto.

Also Sando- charter does have a point. You are strawmanning. It doesn't matter who you were attacking, you were still defending bmc day one. The difference between you and crypto is crypto went after bmc day 2, while you didn't. You and bmc went after crypto.

Kreriov- Have you read day 2 yet? Also is your attack on crypto based on ad hominem or because he makes the most logical lynch? If it is the former, than you are not aiming for your win condition.

Crypto- If you had to choose between Sando and muh for a lynch, who would it be? Also if Trumpet is replaced, will you attack his replacement from his first post?