Big Brother Mafia - Town wins!

farside22 · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Just a note I did put a tag on the clue for the coup on the very first page of this game. I will do this every time I post a new clue.
Oh I can tell some people are not BB watchers. There was a seson season of BB in which they had objects and people come into BB to form a saying. The person who figured it out that season won Coup d'tea

SlySly · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:23 pm

farside22 wrote:
SensFan wrote:farside, I'm quite sure he meant tomorrow as in 24 hours from now when asking about the HOH deadline, for this game day.

I did say 7 days from the post and that was on Wednesday. Tuesday is 7 days from Wed.

EDIT

Ah llama points out my technical issue. Alright another 24 hours so Wednesday it is.
Last day for HOH votes will be till Wednesday Dec 2nd

I will take my shot at lobbying now. A clear deadline was posted by farside in 178 on Sunday and has been reposted several times. There has been plenty of time to dispute it.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:26 am Post subject: 178

farside22 wrote:

HOH decided on Tuesday Dec 1st 4:16pm PST

SensFan · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:36 pm

SlySly, I dare you to come up with one good reason for us to be rushed into a decision, other than the fact that the winds have changed and you may not still get HOH 24 hours from now.

saberwolf · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:37 pm

Oooooo...people are beginning to talk about veto and other important stuff....

I wonder if anybody has clued in yet

farside22 · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:38 pm

SlySly wrote:
farside22 wrote:
SensFan wrote:farside, I'm quite sure he meant tomorrow as in 24 hours from now when asking about the HOH deadline, for this game day.

I did say 7 days from the post and that was on Wednesday. Tuesday is 7 days from Wed.

EDIT

Ah llama points out my technical issue. Alright another 24 hours so Wednesday it is.
Last day for HOH votes will be till Wednesday Dec 2nd
I will take my shot at lobbying now. A clear deadline was posted by farside in 178 on Sunday and has been reposted several times. There has been plenty of time to dispute it.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:26 am Post subject: 178

farside22 wrote:

HOH decided on Tuesday Dec 1st 4:16pm PST

Point taken and noted that if someone saw this as a discrepancy then it should have been pointed out earlier. Since it was clear since page 178 the deadline for many that is the deadline.

With that stated and deadline reached SlySly is this weeks HOH

SlySly · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:39 pm

SensFan wrote:SlySly, I dare you to come up with one good reason for us to be rushed into a decision, other than the fact that the winds have changed and you may not still get HOH 24 hours from now.

Something concrete that has been posted 4 times should be honored.

SlySly · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:40 pm

Thank you, mod!

farside22 · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:40 pm

SlySly as current HOH you have 7 days to nominate 2 people you wish to see up for eviction. How you do this is soley up to you.
Please post in bold your nomination by Dec 7th 4:40pm PST

Once you place 2 nominee's in bold you can not change your mind.

Thank you.

SensFan · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:41 pm

farside, given there was a technical mistake on your part, and that you prodded people like 12 hours before the earlier of the two possible deadlines, I don't get why you're nreverting based only on the one person that stands to gain from the earlier deadline.

SlySly · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:42 pm

Who wants to see my HoH room?

Another post is coming soon, and we will begin discussing my nominees...

saberwolf · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:43 pm

OOOOOOO! OOOOOOO! SLYSLY! SLYSLY! PICK MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

SensFan · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:43 pm

I know this serves no purpose for today, but I'm going to

Vote: SlySly

.

I will 100% be putting him up for eviction tomorrow if I get HOH, and so should anyone else who gets it. There quite simply is absolutely no pro-Town reason he should completely cut off discussion and 'steal' HOH, rather than go with the agreement of the majority.

In terms of serious votes,

Vote: saber

MOD: Will you track votes for us during this stage, or no?

I will track the votes for nom's for you guys but it's up to the HOH if they want to go on those votes.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:45 pm

Haven't caught up yet, but Paltry and Finch are the best choices from what I've seen.

saberwolf · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:46 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Haven't caught up yet, but Paltry and Finch are the best choices from what I've seen.

Screw you, why not me?

Also, I haven't seen anyone remind me why I'm scummy.

LlamaFluff · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:51 pm

I was mulling this over a bit today; because there are two nominations we are considering, yet there is a prefered vote, do we want to introduce a Vote First Vote Second thing where First counts as Two and second one?

For Example

Player A (Vote B, Vote D)
Player B (Vote C, Vote D)
Player C (Vote A, Vote D)
Player D (Vote B, Vote A)

Gives a VC of... B (4), D (3), A (3), C (2)

Just throwing it out there since even though there are two noms, everyone prefers one pick to another, it should be in some way wieghted and reflected. Otherwise someone that is the second pick of three people looks more suspect then the top pick of two people.

SlySly · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:53 pm

SensFan wrote: I will 100% be putting him up for eviction tomorrow if I get HOH, and so should anyone else who gets it. There quite simply is absolutely no pro-Town reason he should completely cut off discussion and 'steal' HOH, rather than go with the agreement of the majority.

We have been here a week, don't whine because you chose to 'forget' about the game and come in at the last second and finally decide to contribute. Lurking until a few hours before the deadline is absolutely not pro-Town. I'm sorry, 2 whiners out of 12 players is not a majority. The rest of the lurkers have been aware that this game is going on, as well. I didn't steal anything.

Moving on....

--------------------------------------------------------

I want everyone to give me the two people they would like me to put up.

I will then share my thoughts of each player in the game and the reasoning behind the 2 I have picked for nomination. At that point I will listen to everyone's thoughts on my picks before solidifying them.

saberwolf · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:53 pm

LlamaFluff wrote:I was mulling this over a bit today; because there are two nominations we are considering, yet there is a prefered vote, do we want to introduce a Vote First Vote Second thing where First counts as Two and second one?

For Example

Player A (Vote B, Vote D)
Player B (Vote C, Vote D)
Player C (Vote A, Vote D)
Player D (Vote B, Vote A)

Gives a VC of... B (4), D (3), A (3), C (2)

Just throwing it out there since even though there are two noms, everyone prefers one pick to another, it should be in some way wieghted and reflected. Otherwise someone that is the second pick of three people looks more suspect then the top pick of two people.

I like this

SensFan · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:56 pm

I absolutely love how SlySly is still accusing me of strategically lurking when I pointed out that it doesn't benefit SensScum or SensTown, and have been the post active poster since farside prodded everyone.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:56 pm

saberwolf wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Haven't caught up yet, but Paltry and Finch are the best choices from what I've seen.
Screw you, why not me?

Because I think you're dumb, not necessarily scum.

SlySly wrote: I want everyone to give me the two people they would like me to put up.

Paltry and Finch. Let me catch up before committing to that though.

SlySly · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:15 pm

SlySly wrote: 2 whiners out of 12 players is not a majority.

I misstated here. I apologize to any offended party. There was only 1 whiner.

SensFan · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:17 pm

Sly, do you happen to have easy access to all the Newb Games you've played? If you could link me to them, it would save me a ton of time.

SlySly · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:20 pm

Kmd4390 wrote: Paltry and Finch. Let me catch up before committing to that though.

No worries or hurries. I am not going to make a hasty decision. Everyone has time to look things over and tell me what they think.

---------------------------------

@Everyone
Reasoning for each of your picks would be of great help, as well.

---------------------------------

@Sens
I don't know how to link to games or posts, so do your own meta. Feel free to link to anything you find. You read up on me, you will see how I earned my sigs.

saberwolf · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:23 pm

I nominate saber and sens for eviction

SensFan · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:23 pm

*sigh* Thought so, since you don't use WT. Thanks anyways.

I

know

I've read a Newb game of yours, and I seem to recall you being this illogical and tunnel-visionned in that one. I'll need to find some way of manually searching or something.

Of note, though, I am a very strong believer in Policy Lynches. Don't expect your meta to save you.

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:34 pm

I vote for saber and siroginous. The first is rather obvious, while sir is voted due to his number talk, which I find to be a distraction (also, the certainty he uses when putting down scum in numbers is rather odd). There's also a general scum read from him. Many posts, not much content.

Also,

Mod: are the clues related to the show?

. If the answer is yes, then it means no coup'd de eta (or however you spell it) for me. D: