I know its bad form to dump out full lists but meh. I kind of need it to keep involved. I've been slacking.
AGar - slight to fairly positive- I think I was overly loud at AGar in early game, and when asked about his opinion of me it didn't seem negative in the slightest. I know it is a bit of WIFOM, but I don't see a scum player who should be a bit reactive not acting on my loudness and early vote on them. At least not at the moment. Been fairly quiet although participating a bit.
Albert B Rampage (Amished) - neutral - Hmm. I have a hard time with Amished. He did claim he thought he knew was PapaZ was going on about, when it was later revealed that PapaZ was just wagoning to wagon pretty much. That's pretty odd in my book. Was fairly aggressive against SC in early game, but ended up on the Sando wagon I think. He seemd to be actively looking around though. ABR hasn't said anything yet.
Charlaten (ekiM) - slight positive- I think that I could read his early questioning of me as just thinking I had bad logic. He didn't necessarilly think that was scummy, and so he never moved his random vote. I think that makes sense. If he was seriously suspecting me, then yes, I would think it odd that he didn't move that vote. But going back to the logic, him just full fledgedly stopping it does seem a bit odd. I would expect him to let me carry on or something I guess. Instead he immediately writes it off as pointless, quick conclusion me thinks, but meh. Then Charlaten replaces in... He pretty much goes hardcore against Sando, but I think he was looking around a bit too, so null read.
ODDin - slight to fairly negative. - Most of his begining day was defending against SC I believe. Meh I am going to be lazy. I did one of these walls recently in a on-going game... and its a bit exhausting sifting through stuff. I think its funny SC died. I think ODDin has been tunneling a bit more than most meh. I can forgive the PapaZ vote after the night, even if it does look like it was a scum plan. However the rest of the stuff still is going to keep him negative in my eyes.
Ojanen - slightly positive - Been away for a bit due to life. When she is around, she is examining multiple people, and her vote hopping seems to follow her suspicions in previous posts, meaning she isn't making the suspicions up as she goes. But life sucks, and the activity level is keeping me from being firm in this read.
Papa Zito - slight to fairly positive - PapaZ's playstyle has changed quite a bit since I have played with him. His begin game was a lot more... well willy nilly. But I didn't catch issues with him wagoning for wagonings sake, or claiming that he had reasons to keep the pressure up. Actually a townie playing the game that way would be most effective using those tactics. He seems to be away at conveinient times... but I can't fault him for that alone. Other than that he seems to be looking around a bit, and is at least appearing to be a bit objective.
Raskol - fairly positive - In early game seemed jumped on ekiM for some of his stances on my actions. Well kind of, he later says it was more about not voting where his suspicions mainly lie when he still had a random vote out. I think the result of this path of discussion was ekiM writing off his concerns of me as 'null', which in ISO on ekiM I buy. Was called out by Amished for building weak cases during the above, but Raskol didn't back down. Goes into a bunch of theory with SA, which is meh in my book, but just meh not worse. Seems confused in day 2, but thats a bit understandable.
VP Baltar - slight to fairly negative - Auto ignore claim in begin game, nice. I don't like the ignoring of PapaZ's unstated intentions (wagoning for wagonings sake is the claim PapaZ later made about his intitions here). He was willing to throw a big fuss at the time about it, possibly trying to decrease the wagon's effectiveness. And he bounced between PapaZ and Sando a bit. That could be legitimatly following concerns, or something else. Eventually switched vote from PapaZ to Amished before he went on vacation and claimed he would come back and switch to Sando if Amished didn't happen (er ok, I would call that an odd thought process). Pretty much immediately comes back and is on PapaZ again. Then votes Zorblag after a bit of discussion. Ok. I'm not going to lie, the 3 major suspicions thing he seems to be doing, and bouncing between confuses me. Sometimes it seems he switches without much game state changing. Seems arbitrary. Also don't like the 'you can't get meaning from the NK' comment.
Zorblag - neutral - Meh. Even with him being away he has been participating a decent amount really. I would really like to see him dump out his current top concerns more concretely though. Sifting through the obeservation/questions he normally does dazzles me.
Questions observations on reread -
Raskol, could I ask for your point about AGar? You are suggesting that him having a parked vote was suspicious? Or just discussing at the moment?
Agar, could you express in words what you disliked about the early day 2 ODDin's vote? I was making an assumption that I shouldn't have.
VP, I am trying to understand the end of day 1 stuff you said. You had a high suspicion of PapaZ leading up to your vacation (your vote was on him), but right before you leave you vote Amished? And say if it Amished doesn't happen you'll just vote Sando? What changed so much that you were willing to leave an unwatched vote on Amished? If Papa was a big suspicion why Sando being the alternative to Amished? Are these guys so close in your head that you move between the group so easilly?
Can I request a current vote count?
