Open 186; Jungle Republic (Game Over)
-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
Lynx: If your vote wasn't a policy vote, what would it fall under then?Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
@Lynx,
if you read two more sentances on that post you should see why.
But... I was wrong, I just assumed CKD was right and barely looked at the vote count .
Still since he is the latest vote on Saber and since the lying thing seems plausible, I see no reason to change.
---
Of the later pushes on Saber, bigmc and ML's are the only one that look possibly opportunistic.
---
Another note. This is not Saber's "generic playstyle". From the game I played with him (and marathon), he came off as a good player. The problem I have is that he is not really invested in this game.
---
@Scott,
Lynching lurkers is ok but its a bit early for that. Threatening to lynch lurkers is better but a lurker lynch < a lynch of someone I think is scummy.-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
Ok, I give you my word, right now, no gambits, all effort.Budja wrote:@Lynx,
if you read two more sentances on that post you should see why.
But... I was wrong, I just assumed CKD was right and barely looked at the vote count .
Still since he is the latest vote on Saber and since the lying thing seems plausible, I see no reason to change.
---
Of the later pushes on Saber, bigmc and ML's are the only one that look possibly opportunistic.
---
Another note. This is not Saber's "generic playstyle". From the game I played with him (and marathon), he came off as a good player. The problem I have is that he is not really invested in this game.
---
@Scott,
Lynching lurkers is ok but its a bit early for that. Threatening to lynch lurkers is better but a lurker lynch < a lynch of someone I think is scummy.Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
-
Lynx The Antithesis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 657
- Joined: December 3, 2008
- Location: The Sun
It's simple really threatening to hammer seemed like an excuse to any solid pressure. If everyone's just afraid to vote you because you might possibly kill yourself than that makes you dangerous. People will continue to just excuse your behavior as just being Saber By bringing up the times when you have played in that manner, it only solidfies my point. But this point is being hammered into the ground and I'd rather not foucs all my attention on you at the moment. Please, Saber, just play to meet your win condition and if you are town don't do anything too drastic to jeopardize the town's chances.saberwolf wrote:Lynx: If your vote wasn't a policy vote, what would it fall under then?
Thanks Budja I don't know why I didn't put that together along with your vote.
Unvote, Vote:Scott Brosiusfor calling out the Saber wagon as anti-town, but failing to actually vote or specify even one of the wagoners for their "scummy behavior".If you got it flaunt it.
-Judas Iscariot-
-
Lynx The Antithesis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 657
- Joined: December 3, 2008
- Location: The Sun
-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
1- I am not ignoring what saber is doing. I'm saying that voting strictly on that basis is poor. bigmc corrected that and attacked SW's content which holds more water than a null playstyle reason.Lynx The Antithesis wrote:
This is the exactly the attitude that simply excuses his play as "just saber." This is precisely what I am afraid of with Saber.Scott wrote:uot;]bigmc- This is how saber plays. It's completely null in my opinion. I am not sure why you keep pressing the issue though.
Scott wrote:CKD- I think the continuing attempt to lynch saber on fairly weak ground is scummier behavior than the potential lie about the missed vote.
Then why aren't you voting one of the scummy wagoners on Saber?
I'm very against this unless we have absolutely no other option such as being under a deadline. And who do you consider being anti-town?Scott wrote:What does everyone think about lynching lurkers? I'm usually against it D1 since if that person is town, there are limited interactions to go off of, but in this setup we have 5/12 people being anti-town. It is easier for us to hit scum aiming for lurkers by basic probability. I would be more willing to lynch a scummy lurker in this setup than others.
2- I was responding directly about bigmc for the question that CKD asked. I did not say the entire wagon was scummy, I said pushing it on grounds of playstyle was.
3. I used the term "anti-town" in this situation to refer to non-town players. There are 3 mafia and 2 wolves, hence 5/12 players in this game are not aligned with the town.
I would like you to quote where I called this wagon anti-town, or where I said everyone on SW's wagon is exuding "scummy behavior".Lynx The Antithesis wrote:Unvote, Vote:Scott Brosiusfor calling out the Saber wagon as anti-town, but failing to actually vote or specify even one of the wagoners for their "scummy behavior".
I think it has been since this "bet" started. Have you played with him since this bet started or was it awhile ago?Budja wrote: ---
Another note. This is not Saber's "generic playstyle". From the game I played with him (and marathon), he came off as a good player. The problem I have is that he is not really invested in this game.Town 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
Lynx The Antithesis Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 657
- Joined: December 3, 2008
- Location: The Sun
Here's where you label the wagon scummy.Scott Brosius wrote:think the continuing attempt to lynch saber on fairly weak ground is scummier behavior than the potential lie about the missed vote
And you're right about the anti-town. I thought you were referring to the players on the saberwolf wagon as anti-town, not the actual number of scum. My fault on that one.
If you were specifically referring to one player on the wagon my points are ill founded and I will unvote after you tell me exactly who you were speaking of in that instance.If you got it flaunt it.
-Judas Iscariot-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
different situation. I misread a vote count posted by the mod. you voted before the mod's vote count. I didnt vote someone who had a ton of votes on him either...the fact you didnt go back and check after the flurry of votes against saber, is telling.bigmc109 wrote: You're voting me for misreading when you did the exact same thing? Saying that I was "worried" about the vote count is a misrepresentation of my position. While it's true that I wouldn't have voted him if I knew it would put him at L-1, I wasn't exactly scouring the topic double-checking every vote. I made a mistake, shish.
why is it true, that you wouldnt have voted him if you knew it would have put him at -1? IF you think he is scum, he deserves your vote...that wasnt my problem with your vote.
also I didnt say you were worried (quite the opposite)...I said IF you were worried about the vote count, you would have acted differently.
I usually hate lynching lurkers...but I have been in 3-4 games back to back, where scum have been the lurkers in that games (for various reason)..that being said, I think I am on a scum trail right now....so, the lurkers can wait.Scott Brosius wrote:
What does everyone think about lynching lurkers? I'm usually against it D1 since if that person is town, there are limited interactions to go off of, but in this setup we have 5/12 people being anti-town. It is easier for us to hit scum aiming for lurkers by basic probability. I would be more willing to lynch a scummy lurker in this setup than others.-
-
hewitt Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2469
- Joined: November 25, 2008
- Location: Chicago, IL
I don't really care if you think I'm sitting on the sidelines and I've already answered why I'm not voting yet. But I'll restate it since you apparently missed it, I don't vote until I think I've found scum. Very simple.dank wrote:Nonetheless, I dont like how you're sitting on the sidelines, not voting anyone, yet throwing out silly accusations like putting someone at L-2 is "basically" putting someone at L-1. Do you think this was scummy? If so, why aren't you voting them? Why aren't you voting anyone?
What is with your constant defense of saber? Why do you want a player who's going to probably act anti-town in this game anyway?dank wrote:That said, bigmc's vote was not L-1. However, his assertion that he "missed" MR's vote is a bit suspicious, and could be a good excuse to put saber in a quick lynch position. Nonetheless, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, since its early in the game, and most of us aren't being all that careful with our votes either (we're just out of rvs).ShowRECORD
Town-Win- 2
Town-NightKilled-Loss- 3
Town-Loss- 4
Mafia-Win- 1
Mafia-Loss- 3
Team Win Percentage- 23.08%
Basically...my teams usually lose. How fun is that!-
-
dank Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 833
- Joined: April 26, 2009
The case on saber was weak. I've no problem with pressuring him to focus on this game with a few votes, but seriously pushing a saber lynch this early using this weak a case on him is borderline scummy.hewitt wrote:
I don't really care if you think I'm sitting on the sidelines and I've already answered why I'm not voting yet. But I'll restate it since you apparently missed it, I don't vote until I think I've found scum. Very simple.dank wrote:Nonetheless, I dont like how you're sitting on the sidelines, not voting anyone, yet throwing out silly accusations like putting someone at L-2 is "basically" putting someone at L-1. Do you think this was scummy? If so, why aren't you voting them? Why aren't you voting anyone?
What is with your constant defense of saber? Why do you want a player who's going to probably act anti-town in this game anyway?dank wrote:That said, bigmc's vote was not L-1. However, his assertion that he "missed" MR's vote is a bit suspicious, and could be a good excuse to put saber in a quick lynch position. Nonetheless, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, since its early in the game, and most of us aren't being all that careful with our votes either (we're just out of rvs).
Also, i'm against lynching lurkers just for lurking, i think thats just common sense. We've got plenty more to go on than that.
Would you like to lynch saber for the sole reason that he's "going to probably act anti-town in this game anyway"?-
-
dank Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 833
- Joined: April 26, 2009
The case on saber was weak. I've no problem with pressuring him to focus on this game with a few votes, but seriously pushing a saber lynch this early using this weak a case on him is borderline scummy.hewitt wrote:
I don't really care if you think I'm sitting on the sidelines and I've already answered why I'm not voting yet. But I'll restate it since you apparently missed it, I don't vote until I think I've found scum. Very simple.dank wrote:Nonetheless, I dont like how you're sitting on the sidelines, not voting anyone, yet throwing out silly accusations like putting someone at L-2 is "basically" putting someone at L-1. Do you think this was scummy? If so, why aren't you voting them? Why aren't you voting anyone?
What is with your constant defense of saber? Why do you want a player who's going to probably act anti-town in this game anyway?dank wrote:That said, bigmc's vote was not L-1. However, his assertion that he "missed" MR's vote is a bit suspicious, and could be a good excuse to put saber in a quick lynch position. Nonetheless, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, since its early in the game, and most of us aren't being all that careful with our votes either (we're just out of rvs).
Would you like to lynch saber for the sole reason that he's "going to probably act anti-town in this game anyway"?
Also, i'm against lynching lurkers just for lurking, i think thats just common sense. We've got plenty more to go on than that.-
-
hewitt Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2469
- Joined: November 25, 2008
- Location: Chicago, IL
If I wanted to lynch saber I would be voting him. I don't think we should be putting pressure on saber because it's A) annoying B) is going to take up a large part of the day probably and C) means that any player that has a reputation for acting anti-town (zwetschenwasser, Empking, Mastin) should be pressured like this and it's honestly going to do nothing to help or progress the game in a healthy manner.
However, I do understand why people would put pressure on saber, he is acting anti-town. But just because I understand it does not mean I agree with it.ShowRECORD
Town-Win- 2
Town-NightKilled-Loss- 3
Town-Loss- 4
Mafia-Win- 1
Mafia-Loss- 3
Team Win Percentage- 23.08%
Basically...my teams usually lose. How fun is that!-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
I was only addressing bigmc in that post not the entire wagon. I did not place a vote on him because he bolstered his case with SW's content, not just style.
I'm not going on a Lynch All Lurkers platform here, just suggesting that in this setup, I think it's more of a scumtell than in other setups.Town 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
bigmc109 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 323
- Joined: August 7, 2009
@ CKD: because SW seemed like the type of player that would need pressure to determine what he's going to do. I wouldn't have put him at L-1 because it risks him being lynched too fast. L-2 was perfect because there's little risk, but a lot of pressure (considering he had 5x as many votes as anyone else). That was the intent of my vote. And tbh, I think it worked, because as I've pointed out, he's said some scummy things since then.Show[b]Record: 2-1
[color=green]Town: 1-0[/color]
[color=red]Mafia: 1-1[/color]
Other: 0-0[/b]
[i][url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13846]Mini 951 - Prison Mafia[/url] needs [b]1 replacement[/b].[/i]-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
please point those scummy things out, don't just say they exist.bigmc109 wrote:@ CKD: because SW seemed like the type of player that would need pressure to determine what he's going to do. I wouldn't have put him at L-1 because it risks him being lynched too fast. L-2 was perfect because there's little risk, but a lot of pressure (considering he had 5x as many votes as anyone else). That was the intent of my vote. And tbh, I think it worked, because as I've pointed out, he's said some scummy things since then.Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
bigmc109 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 323
- Joined: August 7, 2009
I already did.
bigmc109 wrote: Now for some actual scum hunting. I'm not liking sabrewolf at all. In addition to the whole self-lynching thing, I don't like his two attacks. I think Lynx's posts have been very pro-town so far (see 77) and MR was early enough in the BW to not seem scummy going for the easy target. Though I will admit I wouldn't mind the attack on MR so much if he hadn't posted since then, so it might be a nulltell.Show[b]Record: 2-1
[color=green]Town: 1-0[/color]
[color=red]Mafia: 1-1[/color]
Other: 0-0[/b]
[i][url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13846]Mini 951 - Prison Mafia[/url] needs [b]1 replacement[/b].[/i]-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
bigmc109 wrote:I already did.
bigmc109 wrote: Now for some actual scum hunting. I'm not liking sabrewolf at all. In addition to the whole self-lynching thing, I don't like his two attacks. I think Lynx's posts have been very pro-town so far (see 77) and MR was early enough in the BW to not seem scummy going for the easy target. Though I will admit I wouldn't mind the attack on MR so much if he hadn't posted since then, so it might be a nulltell.
1. So are you saying that if I act scummy an then make just one pro-town post, I become obvtown?
2. Position doesn't matter when it comes to alignment. I've seen scum be the first steadfast vote on a scum wagon. I've seen town hammer. Everyone else inbetween matters on how and why they vote. Just because MR voted in Xth place, doesn't credit them town points at all.
FoS: bigmc109Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
GinzkeyPlatz Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 20
- Joined: February 9, 2009
- Location: dreaming
It might be the case that he either chose not to read other people's posts or that he cared more about adding to the wagon than knowing how many votes were on it. There was enough time between MR and bigmc's posts for him to have read it, and there wasn't much to read.curiouskarmadog wrote:
how exactly did you miss the vote?bigmc109 wrote:
I think this addressed at me....curiouskarmadog wrote:whoa whoa whoa...
lets slow this down a bit and have some conversation...what is everybody's hurry?
BG did you know that your vote was putting him at -1? If so, why didnt you mention it? If so, why did you ask for a claim?
unvote.
If it is, no, I missed MR's vote on saber. Though, seeing as you unvoted, I'm keeping my vote on.
calling bullshit on this statement..you read enough to think saber is WIFOMing it up, but did read enough to catch a vote that was very obvious.
first lie here, children
vote bigmc109
bigmc, were you reading everyone else's posts or only saberwolf's? Were you reading them or just skimming them? And why?-
-
bigmc109 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 323
- Joined: August 7, 2009
I was reading everyone's posts. I read all the posts, though I was on my phone. When I got home later, I voted after reading the new posts and seeing no one else had voted for SW.Show[b]Record: 2-1
[color=green]Town: 1-0[/color]
[color=red]Mafia: 1-1[/color]
Other: 0-0[/b]
[i][url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13846]Mini 951 - Prison Mafia[/url] needs [b]1 replacement[/b].[/i]-
-
dank Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 833
- Joined: April 26, 2009
really? Within the 50 minutes prior to your post, MR placed a very bad looking "lets see you hammer yourself vote on saber" taking him to L-2, and minutes before your post, I unvoted because I felt the wagon was growing too much for just pressure, and said I wasn't too happy with it.bigmc109 wrote:I was reading everyone's posts. I read all the posts, though I was on my phone. When I got home later,I voted after reading the new posts and seeing no one else had voted for SW.
And yet, nothing happened before your post?
My issue isn't that you may have simply not been paying much attention at the time; like i said before, few people are careful throwing out votes at that stage of the game. What's caught my attention is how you're trying to make excuses for it that are backfiring, and refusing to admit that you simply weren't paying attention and it was a bad move. You're trying a bit too hard to cover up and qualify the mistake, like you're overly concerned with looking town.
fos-
-
bigmc109 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 323
- Joined: August 7, 2009
Really? Because I think you and CKD are trying a little too hard to make my mistake look like a scum move. Fishy? Maybe. Scummy on its own? Hell no.
FoS: CKD & DankShow[b]Record: 2-1
[color=green]Town: 1-0[/color]
[color=red]Mafia: 1-1[/color]
Other: 0-0[/b]
[i][url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13846]Mini 951 - Prison Mafia[/url] needs [b]1 replacement[/b].[/i]-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
-
-
Budja Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: October 25, 2008
- Location: Australia
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.