Seriously? What gives you this idea? Either way, he's a bad player.kyle99 wrote:besides the option of monkey being a bad player, which I don't think.
Could you please stop parroting other players and put some of your own effort into this game?MonkeyMan576 wrote:Too lazy to do it yourself?
Unvote:
Vote: DDD
Yep. It felt like a very contrived argument - possibly scumbuddies going for some extreme distancing, although 1/1 is the most likely answer.SerialClergyman wrote:No TRAP SPRUNG for hoopla.
Although if you're going to hang around enough to reply to posts and crack one liners, can you find a bit of time to comment on me vs DDD?
That fact that the entirety of the reasoning for the support was based on your reputation only makes me more confident of my opinion.Hoopla wrote:I don't think this point is as relative and poignant as you'd like to think. These supports were based on reputation - they're the equivalent of voting to policy-lynch someone with anti-town meta before they've posted. They are not relevent to this game specifically - and I could see a make-up of 3/2/1 or even 0 scum on that wagon because they weren't comprised of any actual cases. But you're welcome to guess if you have better insight than me.
What do you think cops should do if they are wagoned to a claim? Lie about their role?Kyle wrote:So you think that monkeys claim of cop is legit? Because claiming cop on day one is almost always a bad thing to do, especially without a known doctor. Monkey being scum is the only logical reason I can think of claiming cop, besides the option of monkey being a bad player, which I don't think. If monkey is actually the cop, then he's almost guarenteed to be lynched tonight, which wouldn't be good for the town. Thus, I think monkey being scum is the only logical reason for claiming cop.
No.SerialClergyman wrote:Any clue on which one you think is which? How strong is your read? You don't consider town/town an option?
That I'm scum, and other scum are trying to elect me?Socrates wrote:That fact that the entirety of the reasoning for the support was based on your reputation only makes me more confident of my opinion.Hoopla wrote:I don't think this point is as relative and poignant as you'd like to think. These supports were based on reputation - they're the equivalent of voting to policy-lynch someone with anti-town meta before they've posted. They are not relevent to this game specifically - and I could see a make-up of 3/2/1 or even 0 scum on that wagon because they weren't comprised of any actual cases. But you're welcome to guess if you have better insight than me.
No, you don't have to be scum. If you ARE scum, I don't see myself backing down from this position for the rest of the game though.Hoopla wrote:That I'm scum, and other scum are trying to elect me?Socrates wrote:That fact that the entirety of the reasoning for the support was based on your reputation only makes me more confident of my opinion.Hoopla wrote:I don't think this point is as relative and poignant as you'd like to think. These supports were based on reputation - they're the equivalent of voting to policy-lynch someone with anti-town meta before they've posted. They are not relevent to this game specifically - and I could see a make-up of 3/2/1 or even 0 scum on that wagon because they weren't comprised of any actual cases. But you're welcome to guess if you have better insight than me.
