This is a game of INFORMATION. With your decision you took away all the information that could ever be provided from the lynch. There will be no "oh this player voted X over Y", no "this vote looks odd" nothing. You stripped the town of an essential thing in this game with that move.SlySly wrote:Since you see it this way, you have to agree that the POV was wasted. If you don't think kmd was going to be voted out, there is no way you can say the POV was anything but wasted.LlamaFluff wrote: This is the exact reason he was a horrible nom. Everyone was just going to antivote as opposed to vote someone viewed as scummy over another suspect. That accomplishes *nothing* at all since all that happens is we lynch sens for "he isnt kmd" which would of been my exact reasoning.
I can't put Paltry up. Will you see it any differently if I choose to put you up? You haven't been scumhunting. You have tunneled on me. You have shown a connection to kmd. You have successfully lobbied to waste a tool that could have been more valuable to the town later. You gave no reasoning for your evictee suggestions.
Another great reason that we never should of put you up in the first place. You are setting a precidence that pulling crap like this is an acceptable move. No one wanted kmd lynched. You pretty much nomed just sens as far as I am concerned.No, really I have been doing exactly what I said I would as HoH. I never said I would go with the votes.LlamaFluff wrote: Its an obscenely contrived move since you are basically saying "screw you" to everyones opinions.
Oh im afriad of you nomming me. That would be another waste of a move. You are ignoring the fact that even despite not many people heavily lobbying people to be nommed, there were clear picks for scum, and clear picks for town. You just put up what almost equates to a neutral and town read. How the hell is that remotely a town move?SlySly wrote:Review the reasoning that everyone choose to give in helping me analyze the suggestions. You will notice there wasn't much. The pro-town thing for people to do, would have been to give a good summary behind the reasoning of their picks. Expecting the HoH and everyone else to dig back through after stating, "the reasons I have already stated" is not very helpful and gut feeling is a joke. A few didn't even bother to post suggestions and one of those is one of your choices for the next HoH. You may just get a chance to appoint.
Now lets review who people though was scummyNow, let's review my initial thoughts on alignments:
SlySly wrote: Initial suspicions:
Scum team 1: kmd/zwet/llama
Scum team 2: Sens/animopherv/(saber orGrandipablito)
1: kmd(no)/zwet(yes)/me(no)
2: sens(little)/ani(little)/saber(yes)/grandi(no)
So instead of a yes/yes or yes/little, you go with no/little. Im almost surprised you didnt go with no/no just to piss more people off.
So you are unwilling to put up someone that half the game thinks is scum because they will pick a bad next HoH (if they are scum we need to lynch them anyways) and because they dont have connection (I consider half the game calling them scum a connection).Putting you up, will still match with what I thought after my initial analysis. Since then, you have only added to my suspicions and with putting you up I will still have someone on the block from each team as I suspect them. I sure don't want zwet appointing the next HoH, I would rather any one of my other suspects, including you, do that as they have at least contributed a little to this game.
You calls make zero sense. You are blatantly going against the wishes of the masses, and proving my point that you were the wrong call for HoH, but for reasons even I never saw coming.