Also, starting reread from page 20! Whee! Will comment on stuff as I go. I already commented on some of these things, but I'll go ahead and do so again, just to refresh everybody's memory.
hewitt wrote:No it wasn't Scien I'm not fucking retarded and I know when a case is crap. Especially when you're looking at who started it I mean come on, that's ridiculous.
So, you could obviously see the case was a crappy one by looking at the one who STARTED it. However, you didn't see it D1. Either it's obvious, and then you should've seen it easily D1 and what you're saying is crap, or it's not so obvious, and then what you're saying is crap anyway.
However,
hewitt wrote:What are you trying to prove with the "not a really great track record" ElectricBadger? Because nobody really ever says that unless they're scum looking to discredit a player so nobody will listen to them.
That is indeed a good point against EB.
The rest of post 478 is more crap.
Also, on Maemuki asking Ben for opinions on current events:
Benmage wrote:Bull. Rushed opinions? Whats the point...so i can misinterpret/misread an argument waste my time and others reexplaining it...i'll get to it in due time, and be all caught up and proper soon enough.
[And then:] everything would also be out of context, i wouldnt even know where to look for the current debate...no its best to go from the beginning.
That's exactly what I've been saying right now.
Later, in Ben's posts, he seems to know for claim for certain that I am scum. Interestingly enough - BEFORE he said anything that seems to be the reason for his vote on me right now. Specifically, post 506.
Also, he (ben) talked a lot about what poor a player Zazier is. He's bashed him like there's no tomorrow in his posts - certainly more than he accused me, at least until then. However, he didn't say Zazier is scum at all, while me he's calling scum almost from the get go. Why is that?
Also, notice: initially benmage practically doesn't accuse hewitt at all. At some places he says "he doesn't like his playstyle", but doesn't really go as far as to say it's scummy. In a different place he says hewitt is town, without "if" or "maybe" or anything (when he speaks about Nik in a similar situation, he does insert a "maybe").
Then I call him out on it. The next post after I call him out (post 546) - most of the post is accusing hewitt.
This seriously strengthens my opinion that ben and hewitt are scumbuddies.
The argument between Scien and farside seems kinda meh to me. Lots of wifom and refusal to understand things. farside has a point, Scien's flip on RBT was a bit too sudden and a bit too convenient there. But it's not a very strong point, and Scien was pretty consistent with what he said - be it fabricated or not.
farside seems to say changing opinion = backtracking.
Scien wrote:If indeed you guys are going to lynch me over this crap (and it is crap, you don't have points as much as you have possible motives with no backing), I urge you to take a good look around you. Oddin is not cleared by my flip. Farside isn't either. It is common from what I have seen to get into a 'Well she pushed that townie so hard... she wouldn't do that as scum'. You make sure you really believe that statement if you are going to let her slide for this.
AtE? Scien was nowhere near being lynched over this.
Later, EB is willing to give up on D2... bad. If you don't like the discussions that are happening, you should start new ones.
This is up to and including page 25.