Mini 880 - Mini Quick and Dirty - Game Over

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:41 pm

I'm a monster. I go out at night into little kids houses and pretend I'm Zorblag. lol I'm a white vanilla. Scien claimed already, Ojanen V/L/A, so...charlatan next.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:42 pm

Oh wait! Zorblag hasn't claimed yet. Zorblag next.

VP Baltar · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:43 pm

lol, let's see if your edit goes through better than mine did.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:44 pm

Well that was obv simul-post. O.K. Zito first, then Zorblag.

VP Baltar · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:48 pm

I know it was a simul post. I was just teasing. You don't have to follow my order. If you think Zorblag is a better choice from your perspective, then that's who should claim next.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:53 pm

Zorblag it is then.

Zorblag · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:58 pm

Troll be a vanilla townie. Papa Zito can go next.

-Zorblag R`Lyeh

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:59 pm

Zorblag, out of curiosity, who would you have chosen first if you were the first to claim?

Zorblag · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:27 pm

Papa Zito actually. Troll suspected that would have started the best chain Troll could predict for getting to those Troll was most suspicious of most quickly from everything Troll has seen people say. Past that Troll will wait till the claim process be done before talking about suspicions.

-Zorblag R`Lyeh

Papa Zito · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:49 pm

OLBYAAICBYSUIANRMS

I'm a VT. Gooo go gadjet Charlatan.

charlatan · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:10 pm

Town Tracker. Each night, I can send in the name of one player and see who, if anyone, they target, though what action they take is unknown to me.

The reason I was very pro-massclaim is that I've scored on results. Night 1, I targeted Scien. I found him less involved than in the previous game I'd played with him, and seemed to be arguing more theory; I suspected he might be trying to fly under the radar.

Papa Zito was my night 2 pick, because although I found his Day 1 play less problematic than some others did, I still felt I wasn't getting nearly enough content out of him. I was also unsure what being on the tail end of both lynching wagons meant, but thought it might mean something. He targeted ODDin.

Vote: Papa Zito

I believe that just leaves Ojanen. Obviously, given the circumstances, and as I hinted at before, I have no interest in a no-lynch today.

charlatan · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:12 pm

Oh, forgot to say - Scien didn't target anyone night 1.

crypto · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:47 pm

Charlatan, did you breadcrumb?

Scien looks increasingly town with time and rereads, so . . . yeah.

Vote: Papa Zito.

/slap PZ for trying to shake off my vote

charlatan · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:00 pm

crypto wrote:Charlatan, did you breadcrumb?

No, I didn't. I have never breadcrumbed, actually.

BigBear · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:02 pm

Vote CountPapa Zito - (2) - Charlatan, Crypto

Not Voting

Everyone else

BigBear · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:07 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Depends on the rules.

Mod: Who wins if town no-lynches and mafia doesn't NK?

Wow, I'm sorry, I just noticed this while doing the vote count.

Um... do you mean if we went to day 4 and there were no lynches or killings, well then nothing would happen I guess. The town would be in the same situation.

Scien · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:08 pm

Charlatan wrote:Night 1, I targeted Scien. I found him less involved than in the previous game I'd played with him, and seemed to be arguing more theory; I suspected he might be trying to fly under the radar.

Er. You never bread crumbed you say? I'm fairly sure you said something similar to this before now.

Scien · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:09 pm

Bigbear...

He means, if the town keeps voting to no-lynch, and the scum don't want to kill, who is forced to act?

Pyotr C. Romanof · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:13 pm

EkiM might've breadcrumbed, actually. Go to his iso. and search for "follow."

crypto · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:14 pm

Pyotr C. Romanof wrote:EkiM might've breadcrumbed, actually. Go to his iso. and search for "follow."

EPIC FAIL. Yeesh, this alt didn't even make it into a game yet. Quoted for isos.

BigBear · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:14 pm

Scien wrote:Bigbear...

He means, if the town keeps voting to no-lynch, and the scum don't want to kill, who is forced to act?

Oh I see. I would force all players with night abilities to perform them. If they refuse to use them, then I will randomly select their actions.

charlatan · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:18 pm

Scien wrote:
Charlatan wrote:Night 1, I targeted Scien. I found him less involved than in the previous game I'd played with him, and seemed to be arguing more theory; I suspected he might be trying to fly under the radar.
Er. You never bread crumbed you say? I'm fairly sure you said something similar to this before now.

Well, sure. I've given my opinions on players freely and I would think my target choices probably aren't a huge surprise to some based on that. I'm unsure how that qualifies as breadcrumbing, really, but either way my point is that there are no secret messages, clever puns, or gimmicks of any kind present in any of my posts that will back up the claim.

Papa Zito · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:20 pm

lol charlatan. Sure, you're the only power role in the game.

Obviously we are in a mylo situation if scum are pulling this.

vote: charlatan

Papa Zito · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:21 pm

Love to hear Troll's take on this development.

BigBear · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:22 pm

BigBear wrote:
Scien wrote:Bigbear...

He means, if the town keeps voting to no-lynch, and the scum don't want to kill, who is forced to act?

Oh I see. I would force all players with night abilities to perform them. If they refuse to use them, then I will randomly select their actions.

I have just been informed!!!

There is a standard rule that says if 3 days go past without a kill or lynch the game ends as a draw.