Mini 892 - Mayor Mafia (GAME OVER)

[nhammen]

Ok, this has been discussed, it's clear that no one is going to change their mind.

xRECKONERx, Socrates, nhammen, Hoopla, SerialClergyman, Moai Interceptor Cannons: are any of you going to vote Monkey today?

If not, then I'm dropping Monkey and turning my attention elsewhere.

Nope. Not voting Monkey.

Couldn't be more irrelevent. If there's a cop that the blocker is blocking - they both cancel each other out. If there's no cop, then the blocker is free to try to disrupt any other PRs.

Charter, I'm not voting Monkey, although I'm pretty sure Hoopla will as any alignment.

QFT

IF Hoopla flips scum, THEN you're next up for the lynch. That's how I interpreted it. There's no way Serial's setting up a quicklynch, because then Serial has to be scum, Hoopla has to be NOT scum, and the IF/THEN argument on you dissolves into pretty little butterflies. Or do you know that Hoopla will flip scum?

No idea if Hoopla flips scum. But you forgot the possibility where both Serial and Hoopla are scum. Then it makes sense. Of course, that doesn't make sense. Serial has been attacking Hoopla all day. So there is that point.

Reck makes some good observations. My current likely scum team is Hoopla, and nhammen and Kyle

So you think I've been bussing BOTH of my partners? Your logic is amazing!

[MonkeyMan576]

Ok, this has been discussed, it's clear that no one is going to change their mind.

xRECKONERx, Socrates, nhammen, Hoopla, SerialClergyman, Moai Interceptor Cannons: are any of you going to vote Monkey today?

If not, then I'm dropping Monkey and turning my attention elsewhere.

Nope. Not voting Monkey.

Couldn't be more irrelevent. If there's a cop that the blocker is blocking - they both cancel each other out. If there's no cop, then the blocker is free to try to disrupt any other PRs.

Charter, I'm not voting Monkey, although I'm pretty sure Hoopla will as any alignment.

QFT

IF Hoopla flips scum, THEN you're next up for the lynch. That's how I interpreted it. There's no way Serial's setting up a quicklynch, because then Serial has to be scum, Hoopla has to be NOT scum, and the IF/THEN argument on you dissolves into pretty little butterflies. Or do you know that Hoopla will flip scum?

No idea if Hoopla flips scum. But you forgot the possibility where both Serial and Hoopla are scum. Then it makes sense. Of course, that doesn't make sense. Serial has been attacking Hoopla all day. So there is that point.

Reck makes some good observations. My current likely scum team is Hoopla, and nhammen and Kyle

So you think I've been bussing BOTH of my partners? Your logic is amazing!

Yeah, since bussing never happens...

My evaluation is on who is acting scummiest.

[SaintKerrigan]

Unvote: xRECKONERx.

Thanks, xReck. I feel much better now.

[SerialClergyman]

Unvoting without any other follow up explaining your thoughts or voting someone else is a cardinal sin.

If xrecx has just avoided your wrath, where are you at now?

[MonkeyMan576]

Unvoting without any other follow up explaining your thoughts or voting someone else is a cardinal sin.

If xrecx has just avoided your wrath, where are you at now?

If it's a cardinal sin why aren't you voting reck?

[SerialClergyman]

..

It's a cardinal sin to unvote ANYONE without then talking about your thoughts or voting someone else.

Kerrigan essentially just said 'Rec, I no longer think you're scum' then sat there blowing bubbles.

[MonkeyMan576]

..

It's a cardinal sin to unvote ANYONE without then talking about your thoughts or voting someone else.

Kerrigan essentially just said 'Rec, I no longer think you're scum' then sat there blowing bubbles.

I meant Kerrigan. Why aren't you voting him?

[SerialClergyman]

You need to be more specific or have less typos or possibly both.

I'm taking that as you asking ME why I'm not voting KERRIGAN.

This is because I am very happy with my vote on Hoopla. I'm pointing out to Kerrigan and the town in general that that was a scummy action and I want him to actually answer my questions, but I see no reason to switch.

[MonkeyMan576]

You need to be more specific or have less typos or possibly both.

I'm taking that as you asking ME why I'm not voting KERRIGAN.

This is because I am very happy with my vote on Hoopla. I'm pointing out to Kerrigan and the town in general that that was a scummy action and I want him to actually answer my questions, but I see no reason to switch.

But not even an FOS after saying an action is a "cardinal sin"? Seems fishy to me.

[SerialClergyman]

For the record, I never FOS. I think the entire process is overly dramatic and silly. But good on you for thinking that me bothering to bring a scumtell on another player to the table makes me more likely to be scum (with him? without him?)

[MonkeyMan576]

For the record, I never FOS. I think the entire process is overly dramatic and silly. But good on you for thinking that me bothering to bring a scumtell on another player to the table makes me more likely to be scum (with him? without him?)

That wasn't my point. My point was that you were willing to say he was scummy but not willing to vote or explain how he's a less attractive option than Hoopla. Is Hoopla's sins more than "cardinal"?

[SerialClergyman]

Does that indicate me being scum with or without kerrigan?

Whether that's your point or not, that's what you're saying. Because he's done one thing that I don't like, compared to Hoopla's entire day which I don't like.

Why is it you haven't voted me for this event? You haven't explained why you're not willing to vote me or why I'm a less attractive vote than who you're voting etc etc - see? It's a stupid point.

[MonkeyMan576]

I'm not the one who said it was a "cardinal sin".

Saying that someone who is moderately scummy the whole day is worse than someone who is really scummy for one thing is a valid observation, but that's not what you originally said. The hypocricy is clearly on your part, not mine. And I never said Kerrigan was scum.

[SerialClergyman]

*gives up*

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

*gives up*

We could lynch him, that would solve this problem.

[SerialClergyman]

Good game theory on one side, personal sanity on the other...

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

Good game theory on one side, personal sanity on the other...

Well if you've gone insane will all the good game theory in the world matter because you've lost your shit and you're trying to support the ghost of Abraham Lincoln for mayor and voting for the plus sign?

[SerialClergyman]

Even when sane I'd support the ghost of Abraham Lincoin for mayor. And I'm not even American.

[MonkeyMan576]

I love it when players think they're above being questioned...

[Socrates]

Charter, I am seriously considering moving my vote back onto monkey, I am honestly unsure of where to go since my Kyle wagon seems to be going nowhere.

Just as a shot in the dark without much to back it up, if Kyle flips scum, my first guess for one of his buddies would be Kerrigan, just based on the way he has been acting these last few pages.

I need to think a little more about the recent pages.

[xRECKONERx]

@DDD:

What do you think of my PBPA on kyle?

[MichelSableheart]

Sixteenth support count of day 1:

charter (0)

kyle99 (1)

Hoopla

Moai Interceptor Cannons (0)

Debonair Danny DiPietro (0)

SerialClergyman (0)

Hoopla (1)

SerialClergyman

* Socrates (6)

Socrates, charter, Col.Cathart, kyle99, Moai Interceptor Cannons, nhammen

MonkeyMan576 (1)

Debonair Danny DiPietro

xRECKONERx (0)

nhammen (1)

xRECKONERx

Col.Cathart (0)

SaintKerrigan (0)

Not supporting anyone (2)

SaintKerrigan, MonkeyMan576

With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to elect someone as mayor.

an * marks who would become mayor if the day ended right now.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sixteenth vote count of day 1:

charter (0)

kyle99 (3)

xRECKONERx, Socrates, nhammen

Moai Interceptor Cannons (0)

Debonair Danny DiPietro (0)

SerialClergyman (1)

Hoopla

Hoopla (3)

SerialClergyman, Moai Interceptor Cannons, MonkeyMan576

Socrates (0)

MonkeyMan576 (4)

Col.Cathart, kyle99, Debonair Danny DiPietro, charter

xRECKONERx (0)

nhammen (0)

Col.Cathart (0)

SaintKerrigan (0)

Not voting anyone (1)

SaintKerrigan

With 13 votes available, it takes 7 votes to lynch someone. However, noone can be lynched before a mayor is elected.

[xRECKONERx]

Support: Socrates

Go ahead and get that one out of the way.

[MichelSableheart]

Seventeenth support count of day 1:

charter (0)

kyle99 (1)

Hoopla

Moai Interceptor Cannons (0)

Debonair Danny DiPietro (0)

SerialClergyman (0)

Hoopla (1)

SerialClergyman

Socrates (7)

Socrates, charter, Col.Cathart, kyle99, Moai Interceptor Cannons, nhammen, xRECKONERx

MonkeyMan576 (1)

Debonair Danny DiPietro

xRECKONERx (0)

nhammen (0)

Col.Cathart (0)

SaintKerrigan (0)

Not supporting anyone (2)

SaintKerrigan, MonkeyMan576

With 12 players alive, it takes 7 votes to elect someone as mayor.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The villagers gathered in the central hall of the mayor's home. Discussion that day was heated. There were two topics of conversation: who could be trusted, and who couldn't be. Just before lunchtime, the question of who could be trusted was cleared. Socrates would take the vacant mayor position.

Socrates has been elected mayor day 1. He has 48 hours to pm me his preferred order of successors.

Because going from 12 to 13 votes does not change the number of votes needed to lynch, Socrates' vote counts double during day 1.

[MichelSableheart]

Seventeenth vote count of day 1:

charter (0)

kyle99 (4)

xRECKONERx, Socrates x2, nhammen

Moai Interceptor Cannons (0)

Debonair Danny DiPietro (0)

SerialClergyman (1)

Hoopla

Hoopla (3)

SerialClergyman, Moai Interceptor Cannons, MonkeyMan576

Socrates (0)

MonkeyMan576 (4)

Col.Cathart, kyle99, Debonair Danny DiPietro, charter

xRECKONERx (0)

nhammen (0)

Col.Cathart (0)

SaintKerrigan (0)

Not voting anyone (1)

SaintKerrigan

With 13 votes available, it takes 7 votes to lynch someone.

If at deadline no mayority has been reached, Socrates will decide who gets lynched, regardless of the vote count.