Mini 889 - Shopping Frenzy (Over)

[julienvonwolfe]

Regarding muh: I just think that the way he phrased it sounded like he was trying to appear innocent, as though he actually hadn't realized the game had started. That is honestly how I parsed his post 188, so I checked his posts; when I found TWENTY of them, I basically lost it. Yes, I have a life, but I do know which games I'm in, whether or not my browser crashed or whatever. I still think his attitude is very anti-town, especially since he promised to be more active; he had two posts within 30 minutes, and now nothing. Can we say "active lurking?" IMO, muh should rectify this. Soon.

unvote
FoS: muh

If you're so sure about your vote on muh, why the unvote?

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

unvote
FoS: muh

Seriously, why are you letting others in the town dictate where you are voting?

~~~ We have three days until deadline, we need to get moving so we have time for all of the usual end of day activities. Julie and Josh need to get onto one of the four wagons and then the lesser wagons need to break apart as the people move to the bigger wagons unless they start agitating really hard for the lynch of their choice.

[don_johnson]

The only thing I would like clarified is why you aren't giving Chinaman the benefit of doubt. Meaning, if you agree with most of what he says why does one comment sway your opinion on the matter?

is this for me? if so, i would reiterate my belief that the slip seems "genuine" enough for me to not extend benefit of the doubt on day 1. town players look scummy, scummy players look town, day 1 is mountains of wifom. as it stands now:

We have three days until deadline, we need to get moving so we have time for all of the usual end of day activities.

this is extremely relevant, and i will

unvote chinaman, vote: josh lyman

chinaman is absent and we need to get moving. i have more than enough on josh to lynch and i think the wagon is much more attainable. i will support muh as a deadline policy lynch, but would rather one of china/josh lyman go first.

[nhammen]

Vote Count

Torqez (3): Debonair Danny DiPietro, Scott Brosius, Chinaman
julienvonwolfe (3): PaltryExcuse, Wulfy, CallMeLiam
Debonair Danny DiPietro (2): muh316, el simo
Josh Lyman (2): julienvonwolfe, don_johnson
Chinaman (1): Torqez
muh316 (1): Josh Lyman

Not voting

(0):

with 12 players remaining, it takes 7 to lynch

[Torqez]

k, i'm back!

Will read up soonish.

[muh316]

Josh, doent your case on me seem a bit...... desperate. It seems like your looking for small reasons to get a lynch started.

[PaltryExcuse]

Josh, doent your case on me seem a bit...... desperate. It seems like your looking for small reasons to get a lynch started.

Can you give us something with a bit more analysis?

[CallMeLiam]

Josh, doent your case on me seem a bit...... desperate. It seems like your looking for small reasons to get a lynch started.

Not that i disagree with the first half of this, but we're almost at deadline and we need to get moving on a lynch. Looking at the leading wagons 9Torq, DDD, JVW and Josh) I'm still happiest with Julien because not much has happened with him even after my vote went on but his push for the d_j lynch and switch to muh for no real reason, I'd be not unhappy with Josh as a second choice.

We need to lynch and I think these are the only two real targets.

[Chinaman]

Hey guys, I'm here but due to the X-mas holiday season, I'm absent a lot. Sorry about this and I will read up on this thread as soon as I can and post thoughts from last I posted.

[don_johnson]

^^ thoroughly unimpressed with this so close to deadline.

liam: what is the case on jvw? if its already posted just give me a post number. i find their pick up on josh lyman's behavior to be townish so i would like something to compare it to.

[CallMeLiam]

^^ thoroughly unimpressed with this so close to deadline.

liam: what is the case on jvw? if its already posted just give me a post number. i find their pick up on josh lyman's behavior to be townish so i would like something to compare it to.

There was no detailed case, I just noted when I replaced in that I hadn't seen much unique or detailed thought from JVW, just sparse posts (including one popping in asking people to pipe up without providing any content of his own) and since then I am still yet to see any real substance. Even calling out Josh is something other people have done before. This close to the deadline anyone not acting with some urgency is looking unhelpful.

[Josh Lyman]

@Mod: I am going to be partially V/LA until Monday. "Partially" means I may only be online once per day.

[nhammen]

@Mod: I am going to be partially V/LA until Monday. "Partially" means I may only be online once per day.

Noted.

Prodding Scott Brosius and el simo

[don_johnson]

liam: the case is weak. join the josh lyman wagon. its stronger.

[PaltryExcuse]

I don't think the case on JVW is weak, many of his posts you could say are an extension of others' arguments.

However, Josh's recent vote on muh and rapid unvote on some pressuring has be a bit irked. So...

Unvote
Vote: Josh Lyman

[CallMeLiam]

liam: the case is weak. join the josh lyman wagon. its stronger.

I'll switch if I have to (to ensure a lynch), but I'm sticking with JVW because I don't like how he's managing staying under the radar. That tells me someone's keeping the pressure aimed elsewhere and that sounds like scummy teamwork to me.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

Unvote, Vote: Josh Lyman

Let's go, let's go, let's go. He let a little town pressure dictate his play which means either his original play was extremely weak and he knew it or he's afraid to cross the town, both are scummy.

[julienvonwolfe]

liam: the case is weak. join the josh lyman wagon. its stronger.

I'll switch if I have to (to ensure a lynch), but I'm sticking with JVW because I don't like how he's managing staying under the radar. That tells me someone's keeping the pressure aimed elsewhere and that sounds like scummy teamwork to me.

I'm sorry I wasn't on. Internet went down for a few days, unexpectedly.

Liam, tell me how 186, 191, and 200 are based off anybody else's thoughts?

[muh316]

Im just going to join the wagon because of the deadline. it seemed to pass by so fast. So we should probably just get on a good wagon for now.

Vote Josh Lyman

[julienvonwolfe]

Your reluctance to wagon is noted.

[Wulfy]

@Paltry: Where do you plan on getting more info regarding DJ? Ask more question.

Muh, say something relevant.

If you see something I'm missing feel free to go at it.

The only thing I would like clarified is why you aren't giving Chinaman the benefit of doubt. Meaning, if you agree with most of what he says why does one comment sway your opinion on the matter?

...?
You're clearly mistaking me for someone else. You have yet to explain how you plan on getting more information out of DJ and I am voting wolfe not Chinaman. Noting one scummy statement was noted by ANOTHERPLAYER (DJ) isn't really refusing benefit of the doubt. However, your unbelievable reaction here looks really scummy, maybe you and chinaman are partners? And his absence forced you to try and protect him because of DJ catching a "slip."

Unvote; vote Paltry

I amy switch to a larger bandwagon, but I just don't like this play.

[julienvonwolfe]

Can you clarify your last sentence, Wulfy?

[PaltryExcuse]

@Paltry: Where do you plan on getting more info regarding DJ? Ask more question.

Muh, say something relevant.

If you see something I'm missing feel free to go at it.

The only thing I would like clarified is why you aren't giving Chinaman the benefit of doubt. Meaning, if you agree with most of what he says why does one comment sway your opinion on the matter?

...?
You're clearly mistaking me for someone else. You have yet to explain how you plan on getting more information out of DJ and I am voting wolfe not Chinaman. Noting one scummy statement was noted by ANOTHERPLAYER (DJ) isn't really refusing benefit of the doubt. However, your unbelievable reaction here looks really scummy, maybe you and chinaman are partners? And his absence forced you to try and protect him because of DJ catching a "slip."

Unvote; vote Paltry

I amy switch to a larger bandwagon, but I just don't like this play.

That question was for

DJ

, and he has already answered it above. Just because I'm not pursuing DJ as you want me to doesn't make me scum. Depending on DJ's actions, and his comments through the rest of the game, I'll judge him as I would any member of unconfirmed status. What exactly are you hoping for?

Secondly,

today

is

the deadline

. We need a lynch.

[CallMeLiam]

I'll catch up with the game on Day 2, for now we need to lynch

unvote, vote: josh lyman

Josh, if you're a power role claim now, it might not be too late.

[nhammen]

bump to put vote count on top of new page