Just going to quickly clear up some misreps in here.Jazzmyn wrote:Hewitt: suspicious for his early over-defensiveness, for his silly posts supporting CKD's erroneous claim that saber was at L-1 when he was actually at L-2, for his odd interaction with saber around the 149 mark, and then his abrupt turnaround to put saber at L-1 himself, and his subsequent wishy washy interaction with saber after that. Possible scum slip in his post 239 when he says "if saber flips scum" instead of "if saber flips town". Then there is the fact that after putting saber at L-1, which implicitly means that you want someone to hammer the player that you've put at L-1, hewitt expressly says that he doesn't want Budja to hammer saber when Budja indicated a willingness to do so. If hewitt was town and genuinely believed in his L-1 vote, why would he object to Budja hammering? Makes no sense to me. Then he starts waffling on saber again after that. Too much wishy-washiness for my liking.
1. Since saber had expressed the possibility of self-hammering as he had in the past I was saying that putting him at L-2 was almost as good as putting him at L-1 considering he might just self-hammer. That was completely valid.
2. Considering we can't talk about ongoing games I don't know how much I can divulge in the "abrupt turnaround" but I will say if you go read my games that I was in with saber you will understand.
3. I said I had an issue with BUDJA hammering not with a hammering in general. And I think I clearly stated my reasonings as to why.
